New World Order Becoming a Mainstream Issue By James Reed

After President Joe Biden speaking of the endgame of the Ukrainian War creating a New World Order (NOW), the topic, once a concern of conspiracy theorists, has gone mainstream, proving that a conspiracy today, is truth tomorrow. Below are some US takes on the NWO, but a more recent one comes from South Australian Senator Alex Antic who detailed to the parliament how the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum (WEF) is but the latest manifestation of the communist drive for the destruction of national sovereignty and total global control, as embodied in the new mantra, “you will own nothing, and be happy.” Senator antic detailed how the Covid mandates, with the harshest restrictions, derived from WEF policy. And it is not surprising that the WEF has this influence upon parliaments, since WEF founder Klaus Schwab himself, has claimed to have implanted WEF Young Global Leaders in world government cabinets, gloating, “We penetrate the cabinets… I know that half of this cabinet or even more than half are actually Young Global Leaders of the WEF.” Good for the senator for expressing this in parliament.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/australian-senator-walks-into-parliament-and-drops-truth-bombs-about-klaus-schwab-world-economic-forum/

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=510652393798251#

“A South Australian senator lifted the curtain on the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset agenda during a recent parliament meeting, exposing it as a subversive communist ploy.

On Tuesday, Senator Alex Antic, a member of the Liberal Party of Australia, broke down how the WEF steers global politics by installing Young Global Leaders in positions of power across the world.

To expose this, Antic quoted WEF founder Klaus Schwab himself, who infamously bragged about installing Young Global Leaders in several world government cabinets, saying, “We penetrate the cabinets… I know that half of this cabinet or even more than half are actually Young Global Leaders of the WEF.”

Antic told parliament members, “The World Economic Forum promotes globalist issues such as climate change, so-called systemic sex and racism and creating an online digital identity.”

“However, closer inspection reveals the WEF is an anti-capitalist, anti-free market organization that seeks to subvert Western values and political processes and they’re very organized and very well-funded.”

“Their message,” he continued, “is designed to appear harmless, when in fact the ideology that underpins it is revolutionary and destructive.”

The senator for South Australia went on to explain the WEF was instrumental in promoting the harshest Covid restrictions on the planet, “including lockdowns, mandatory vaccinations, vaccine passports and mask mandates, despite these policies assaulting many of our basic liberties.”

Antic also broke down the WEF’s central ideology of “stakeholder capitalism,” which assumes that “traditional free market capitalism ignores the dangers posed by climate change, and so the government must enforce restrictive policies to save the environment – even if that means less wealth.”

Schwab’s “Great Reset,” Antic explained, seeks to “reimagine and reinvent” society and policies in the wake of the pandemic. He also exposed how its 2030 goal of “own nothing and be happy” is a thinly-veiled communist slogan.

“You don’t have to be a political philosopher to figure out that if you own nothing, the state owns everything. There’s another word for this: it’s called Communism.”

The senator concluded with a call to action for Australians to learn more about the WEF’s marxist agenda before their country’s no longer recognizable.

“No matter how sophisticated the WEF tries to make the abolition of private property around the world sound, the fantasies of Karl Marx always lead to the crushing of individuals’ liberties and lives and the expansion of the state’s tyranny and power.”

“It is imperative that we pay close attention to the World Economic Forum and do all that we can to preserve liberty and reduce government intrusion in our lives, and if we fail to do so, the anti-democratic forces in the west will continue to march on and we may wake up to an Australia that we no longer recognize.”

“Australians deserve to know the extent to which the World Economic Forum’s influence and infiltration of our country, and how far it has gone and we’re gonna find out.”

With liberal propaganda reaching alarming proportions and seeping into every aspect of society, it’s more necessary than ever that elected representatives take a cue from Senator Antic and begin sounding the alarm about the WEF’s nefarious Great Reset agenda.”

 

https://alt-market.us/what-is-the-great-reset-and-what-do-the-globalists-actually-want/

 

By Brandon Smith

I first heard the phrase “Great Reset” way back in 2014. Christine Lagarde, who was head of the IMF at the time, was suddenly becoming very vocal about global centralization. It was an agenda that was generally only whispered about in the dark corners of institutional white papers and the secretive meetings of banking elites, but now these people were becoming rather loud about it.

Lagarde was doing a Q&A at the World Economic Forum and the notion of the “Reset” was very deliberately brought up; what the project entailed was vague, but the basic root of it was a dramatic shift away from the current economic, social and political models of the world into a globally centralized and integrated system – A “New World Order,” if you will…

It’s important to remember that we had just jumped through the fires of an international credit collapse which started in 2008 and had continued to cause uncertainty in markets for years. The central banks had dumped tens of trillions of dollars worth of stimulus into the system just to keep it on life support. Some of us in the alternative media believed that these actions were not meant to save the economy, only zombify the economy through currency devaluation and inflation. Not long down the road, this zombie creation would turn on us and try to eat us alive, and only the central bankers new exactly when this would occur.

Think of the crash of 2008 as Stage 1 of the Reset agenda; the globalists were getting cocky and were ready to unveil their plans to the public.

Lagarde’s discussion at the WEF was also held around the time that Klaus Schwab was introducing his 4th Industrial Revolution concept, which is a little more forward with what the globalists really want. He talks excitedly of a true “global society” and a world in which people turn to Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a better means of governance. He even suggests that laws would eventually be dictated by AI and that courts would be run by robots.

Of course, he admits that this cannot happen without a period of economic deconstruction in which people and governments will have to choose between sacrifice for the sake of stability or continued pain in the name of holding on to the “old ways.” Look at it this way: The Great Reset is the action or the chaos, and the 4th Industrial Revolution is the intended result or planned “order.” That is to say, it’s a new order created out of engineered chaos.

Yeah, it sounds like bad science fiction, but remember these are the people that enjoy the undivided attention of many of our political leaders and they rub elbows with the central bankers at the Federal Reserve. I’ll say it again: The proponents of the Great Reset and the 4th Industrial Revolution, who want to completely undermine and reconstitute our society and way of life, are close partners with our national leaders and the very bankers that could force such a reset to happen through a deliberate collapse.

The globalists have been trying to rebrand and repackage their New World Order agenda for many years, and the Reset was what they came up with. Rather than being innocuous sounding, the term threatens systemic upheaval and an erasure of the past. When you “reset” something it usually goes back to zero – A blank slate that the engineers can use to rewrite the code and the functions. But what does this really mean?

What do the globalists REALLY WANT? Here are the details, so far as I can prove or support with evidence, of what the “Great Reset” actually is and what programs they hope to enforce:

Total Global Economic Centralization

Some people might claim that we already have global economic centralization, but they don’t understand what this really means. While national central banks are all members of the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements and take their marching orders from these institutions, what the globalists want is open global governance of finance, probably through the IMF.

In other words, it’s not enough that they manipulate economies secretly by using national central banks as proxies; what they want is to stop hiding and to come out into the light as the magnanimous rulers they think they are.

The ultimate goal of full centralization is to erase the very idea of free markets and to allow a handful of people to micromanage every aspect of trade and business. It’s not just about influence, it’s about economic empire. But in order to achieve a global central bank they must first implement a one world currency plan.

A One World Digital Currency System

The IMF has been talking about using their Special Drawing Rights basket as the foundation for a global currency for years (since at least the year 2000). Around a decade ago China started taking on trillions of dollars in debt just to qualify as a member of the SDR system, and the IMF has hinted that when all is said and done that system will go digital. All that is needed is the right kind of crisis to shock the public into compliance.

This was evident at the height of the covid pandemic lockdowns and the threat of economic disaster when globalist institutions began to suggest that the IMF’s SDR could be used as a safety net for nations, with strings attached, of course. But beyond the stresses of the pandemic there is a much bigger crisis; namely the stagflationary crisis now on our doorstep. With multiple national currencies in decline and the dollar’s world reserve status increasingly in question, I have no doubt that the globalists will take the opportunity to offer the public their digital currency as a solution.

The new system would be more like a phantom currency for a time. The SDR would be the glue or the backing while national currencies remain in circulation until the digital framework becomes pervasive. The IMF and the people behind it would become the defacto world central bank, with the power to steer the course of all national economies through a single currency mechanism.

On the micro-economic side, each and every individual would now be dependent on a digital currency or cryptocurrency which removes all privacy in trade. All transactions would be tracked, and by the very nature of blockchain technology and the digital ledger this would be required. The money elites wouldn’t have to explain the tracking, all they would have to say is “That’s how the technology functions; without the ledger it doesn’t work.”

A Global Social Credit System

The evil inherent in globalism was readily apparent during the recent lockdowns and the violent push for medical tyranny. Despite the fact that covid only had a median Infection Fatality Rate of only 0.27% according to dozens of official studies, the WEF contingent of politicians and world leaders were frothing at the mouth, proclaiming that the existence of covid gave them the right to take total control of people’s lives.

Klaus Schwab and the WEF happily announced that the pandemic was the beginning of the “Great Reset” and the 4th Industrial Revolution, stating that the covid crisis presented a perfect “opportunity” for change.

The vaccine passports were thankfully defeated by numerous conservative red states in the US, leading to the complete reversal of such policies across most of the western world. We were free for years while many blue states and other countries were facing authoritarianism and this caused a lot of problems for the globalists. It’s hard to institute a global medical dystopia when people around the world can look at the conservatives in the US and see that we are living just fine without the controls.

The vax passports need to be understood as a first step towards something else – The beginning of a massive social credit system much like the one being used in China right now. If you think cancel culture is a nightmare today, just think what would happen if the collectivist mob had the power to drop a review bomb on your social credit account and declare you to be untouchable? Imagine if they had the power to simply shut down your ability to get a job, to shop in grocery stores and even shut down access to your money? Without your compliance to the collective, access to normal survival necessities would be impossible.

This is what the globalists want, as they openly admitted at the start of the pandemic, and the vax passports would have been an introduction to that technocratic horror had we conservatives not stood our ground.

You Will Own Nothing And Be Happy By 2030

The “Sharing Economy” (also sometimes referenced in parallel with “Stakeholder Capitalism”) is a concept that has been making the rounds in the WEF for a few years now. The media has attempted at every turn to spread lies and disinformation claiming that the plan does not exist; but again, it is openly admitted.

The sharing economy is essentially a communistic economy, but distilled down to a bizarre minimalism even people who lived in the Soviet Union did not have to experience. The structure is described as a kind of commune based society in which people live in Section 8-style housing, with shared kitchens, shared bathrooms, and barely any privacy. All property is rented, or borrowed. All cars are borrowed and shared, most transit is mass transit, basic personal items such as computers, phones, and even cooking utensils might be shared or borrowed items. As the WEF says, you will own nothing.

Being happy about it is another matter.

The argument for this kind of society is of course that “climate change” and the frailties of consumer economics demand that we reduce our living standards to near zero and abandon the sacred ideal of property ownership for the sake of the planet.

Set aside the fact that carbon based global warming is a farce. The world’s temperatures have only risen by 1 DEGREE CELSIUS in the span of a century, according to the NOAA. This was data that climate scientists had attempted to hide or gloss over for years, but now it is out there for everyone to see. There is no proof of man made global warming. None.

The globalists have been scheming to use environmentalism as an excuse for centralization since at least 1972, when the Club Of Rome published a treatise titled ‘The Limits To Growth’. Twenty years later they would publish a book titled ‘The First Global Revolution.’ In that document they specifically recommend using global warming as a vehicle:

In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

The statement comes from Chapter 5 – The Vacuum, which covers their position on the need for global government. The quote is relatively clear; a common enemy must be conjured in order to trick humanity into uniting under a single banner, and the elites see environmental catastrophe, caused by mankind itself, as the best possible motivator.

They present the solution of the shared economy concept as if it is a new and bold idea. What the globalists ultimately want for their Great Reset, however, is a tidal wave reversal from freedom and individual prosperity back to a very old manner of doing things, similar to ancient feudalism. You become a peasant working on land owned by the elites, or by the state, and you will never be allowed to own that land.

The only difference would be that in a feudal empire of the past peasants could not own land because of the class system. This time around, you won’t be allowed to own anything, including land, because wanting to own anything is “selfish” and destructive to the planet.

Total Information Control

The truth is a rare commodity these days, but nowhere near as rare as it will be if these elitists get what they want. The globalists are far more open about their agenda today than they have ever been before, and I suspect this is because they believe they will be able to rewrite the history of today’s events with impunity after the Reset unfolds. They think they will own the world of information and will be able to edit our cultural memory as they go.

The mainstream media calls all of this “conspiracy theory.” I call it conspiracy reality. It’s hard to deny openly spoken admissions by the globalists themselves, all they can do is try to spin the information as much as possible to keep the public on the fence in terms of what needs to be done, which is a purge of the globalists from our country and perhaps the entire world.

If we do not do this, there will come a time when nothing I say here is remembered and no evidence of the Reset plan will exist. The establishment will have eliminated all notions of it from written history, leaving only a fantasy tale of how the world collapsed and a small organization of “visionary” globalists saved it from oblivion through a new religion of centralization.”

 https://summit.news/2022/04/01/keep-them-docile-with-drugs-video-games/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/new-world-order-coming/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=2f216e94-723c-4f05-8ce5-43736c97f2bd

“On Thursday’s episode of The Hill’s “Rising,” journalist and political commentator Kim Iversen speaking with hosts Ryan Grim and Robby Soave asked whether the “New World Order” was just a “right-wing conspiracy” — or a mainstream concept now “loosely falling out of the mouths of global leaders everywhere.”

On the side of the “right-wing conspiracy” theory, Iversen cited in full the Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) definition of the term “New World Order:”

“A term used to refer to a right-wing conspiracy theory that became popular among anti-government extremists from the 1990s onwards. ‘New World Order’ conspiracists believe that a tyrannical, socialist ‘one-world’ conspiracy has already taken over most of the planet and schemes to eliminate the last bastion of freedom, the United States, with the help of collaborators within the government.

“Through repressive measures, as well as manufactured crises such as terrorist attacks and pandemics, the globalist conspirators seek to eliminate dissent and to disarm Americans so that the ‘New World Order’ can move in and enslave them.

“‘New World Order’ conspiracists also commonly believe that hundreds of concentration camps have been built in the U.S., ready to house dissenters; that the government will declare martial law, possibly on a pretext such as responding to a terrorist attack; and that the government will engage in mass gun confiscations.”

The ADL, founded in 1913, describes itself as “a global leader in exposing extremism, delivering anti-bias education and fighting hate online.” Its “ultimate goal is a world in which no group or individual suffers from bias, discrimination or hate.”

Iversen suggested that with a few strategic substitutions — “authoritarian” for “tyrannical,” “control” for “enslave” and “censorship” for “concentration camps” — the ADL’s definition of New World Order “doesn’t sound that insane” in relation to current events.

“Many of us lost our freedoms during the pandemic,” Iversen said. “And in the recent era, we’ve seen dissenters like Julian Assange and various protesters jailed for speaking up.”

On the other hand, Iversen said, the phrase “New World Order” is now being used casually by world leaders everywhere — from lead speakers this week at the World Government Summit 2022 to President Biden himself who on March 21 said:

“You know we are at an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy — not just the world economy, in the world. It occurs every three to four generations…. There’s gonna be a new world order out there and we’ve gotta lead it and we’ve gotta unite the rest of the free world.”

Is this just a question of “conspiracy theorists” taking the president’s “innocent use of the phrase” out of context, Iversen asked — referring to the “eye-rolling” response by mainstream media, eager, she said, to fact check “for context?”

Iversen did not think so:

“So now we have Joe Biden, Emirati leaders [at the World Government Summit] and Klaus Schwab all talking about the ‘New World Order’ forming. What next?

“Well, it turns out the Chinese and the Russians have been talking about it as well. In fact, the two nations just got together yesterday and declared they’re building a new democratic world order together.”

Iversen said, “it’s time to pay attention to the conspiracy theorists, especially as Russia and China force the world away from the petrodollar and into the new petro-ruble or petroyuan.”

She added, “Imagine a ‘New World Order under China — it would be a tyrannical socialist world using repressive measures to eliminate dissent and housing dissenters in concentration camps.”

Responding to Iversen, Soave said, “A lot of these forces are at odds with each other, but that doesn’t mean you’re wrong about the dangers of forces that want to restrict our freedoms, seizing opportunities like the pandemic and terrorism to restrict those freedoms.”

Much of the conversation that followed sought to distinguish extreme theories of “corporate executives all getting together and worshiping Satan while having orgies with children” from legitimate concerns about the concentration of corporate power and influence across the globe and rising authoritarianism within governments.

Iversen said that whether one is speaking of “world orders past or future world orders” it’s all “based on the money.”

And while there is obviously true opposition between China and the U.S., China’s heavy investments in virtually every U.S. industry have bought “a ton of influence,” Iversen said:

 “They own a lot of [American] farmland, they own investments into nearly every single industry, and we’ve seen that play out publicly on the stage such that the NBA can’t criticize certain things because they are so heavily invested in China.”

As the segment concluded, Grim suggested we’re facing a situation similar to the political machinations 

portrayed on HBO’s “Game of Thrones.””

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Sunday, 03 March 2024

Captcha Image