New Genetic Evidence Questions Aboriginal Arrival in Australia: The 65,000-Year Timeline Propaganda is Wrong! By Brian Simpson
For decades, we've been told Aboriginal Australians arrived on the continent as early as 40,000 years ago, with recent archaeological finds pushing that timeline to 65,000 years or more. Sites like Madjedbebe in Northern Australia, with stone tools dated to 65,000 years ago, have been hailed as proof of one of humanity's earliest migrations. But a new study from La Trobe University and the University of Utah, published in Archaeology in Oceania (2025), throws a wrench into this narrative. By analysing Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA in Aboriginal populations, the researchers argue that humans couldn't have reached Australia, part of the ancient Sahul paleocontinent, before 50,000 years ago. This challenges not just the timeline but the genetic basis for claims of such an ancient Aboriginal presence. Let's unpack what this means and why it matters for ordinary folks curious about Australia's deep history.
The 65,000-Year Claim: What's the Evidence?
The idea that Aboriginal Australians arrived 65,000 years ago comes from archaeological finds. The Madjedbebe rock shelter in the Northern Territory revealed stone tools, ochre, and other artifacts dated to 65,000 ± 5,000 years, per a 2017 Nature study. Similar evidence from Mololo Cave on Waigeo Island (51,100 ± 2,700 years) and Sulawesi cave art (51,200 years) supports early human presence in the broader Sahul region, which included Australia, Tasmania, and New Guinea during the Ice Age. These dates, backed by multiple dating techniques, have been celebrated as proof that Aboriginal people were among the first modern humans to leave Africa, navigating vast oceans to settle a new land.
This timeline fits neatly with cultural narratives of Aboriginal longevity, often tied to Dreamtime stories, and has been embraced by academics and activists alike. But as the new study points out, there's a problem: the genetic evidence doesn't add up. If humans were in Australia 65,000 years ago, their DNA should tell a different story, one that this research says is missing.
The Genetic Challenge: Neanderthal DNA Sets a Limit
The La Trobe-Utah study, published in Archaeology in Oceania (2025), digs into the DNA of modern Aboriginal Australians to test the 65,000-year claim. Here's the key finding: like all non-African populations, Aboriginal people carry about 2% Neanderthal DNA, a result of interbreeding between modern humans and Neanderthals in Europe between 43,500 and 51,500 years ago, as confirmed by recent Nature and Science studies. This interbreeding happened after modern humans left Africa, setting a genetic clock for when their descendants could have reached Sahul.
If Aboriginal ancestors were in Australia 65,000 years ago, they would have had to leave Africa before this Neanderthal interbreeding, meaning their DNA should show less — or no — Neanderthal ancestry compared to other non-African groups. But the study finds no such dilution: Aboriginal Australians have the same 2% Neanderthal DNA as Europeans or Asians, suggesting their ancestors didn't arrive in Sahul until after the interbreeding event, likely less than 50,000 years ago. They also carry 2-5% Denisovan DNA, acquired later in Asia, further supporting a more recent migration timeline.
This genetic evidence is a game-changer. It suggests the first modern humans to reach Sahul couldn't have been there 65,000 years ago, unless they somehow avoided Neanderthal interbreeding entirely, which seems unlikely given the consistent DNA patterns across all non-African populations. For ordinary folks, this is like finding out a family history book has the dates wrong, it doesn't erase the story, but it forces a rethink.
What About the Archaeological Evidence?
The study doesn't dismiss the archaeological finds at Madjedbebe or elsewhere, it questions their interpretation. Those 65,000-year-old tools could belong to an earlier wave of humans who died out or left minimal genetic trace, possibly not contributing to modern Aboriginal populations. Another possibility is that the artifacts were made by non-modern humans, like Denisovans, who were in East Asia as early as 146,000 years ago, per the Homo longi skull find in China. The Ayta Magbukon in the Philippines, with up to 9% Denisovan DNA, show independent admixture events, hinting that Denisovans might have roamed Sahul, leaving tools but not modern human descendants.
This raises big questions: Were the Madjedbebe artifacts made by modern humans, or by an extinct group like Denisovans? Are the dates accurate, or could dating methods be off? The genetic evidence sets a hard limit, and the 65,000-year claim doesn't fit.
Implications for Aboriginal Identity
This study doesn't deny Aboriginal Australians' deep connection to the land, they've been here longer than most cultures, with a rich history spanning tens of thousands of years. But it challenges the genetic basis for claims of a 65,000-year presence. If their ancestors arrived closer to 50,000 years ago, it aligns with global human migration patterns but shortens the timeline of continuous occupation. This could spark debate, especially among those who tie Aboriginal identity to an ancient arrival.
For the average person, this feels like a clash between science and storytelling. Aboriginal oral traditions, like Dreamtime, don't rely on precise dates, but the 65,000-year claim has been a powerful symbol. If genetic evidence caps the timeline at 50,000 years, it doesn't diminish cultural significance but might challenge political narratives built on being "the oldest continuous culture."
It looks like another woke ideology falls.
https://phys.org/news/2025-07-genetic-evidence-early-colonization-timelines.html
"Researchers at La Trobe University, Australia, and the University of Utah, U.S., report that recent DNA findings challenge claims of a 65,000-year-old human arrival in Sahul—the ancient paleocontinent that existed during the Pleistocene ice age, made up of present-day Australia, Tasmania, and New Guinea.
Science tends to be irreverent of preexisting beliefs. Overturning the Earth-centric universe with one that centers around the sun upset thousands of years of well-reasoned observations and mythical contemplations.
Later discoveries showed that the sun itself moves along a rural stretch of a spiral arm amidst hundreds of billions of stars in the Milky Way, in a universe brimming with trillions of galaxies, firmly upending any concept of humanity being at or even near the center of anything.
Archaeological anthropology has gained an especially irreverent reputation, as there is scarcely an origin story of any culture on Earth that has not been amended or refuted by its findings. That irreverence also applies to the field itself when evidence emerges to question long-accepted interpretations, including those once presented as prevailing frameworks.
Human migration into Sahul is a pivotal event in understanding the global dispersal of current modern humans. Earlier archaeological work proposed dates as far back as 65 kya, and with good supporting evidence. Mololo Cave on Waigeo Island, immediately west of New Guinea, holds a resin artifact dated to 51.1 ± 2.7 kya.
Sulawesi cave art on an Indonesian island dates to approximately 51.2 kya, supporting human presence along a possible northern migration route. At the Madjedbebe site in Northern Australia, multiple dating techniques present evidence of 65 kya stone tools and other human activity.
With such convincing evidence of early human population presence in ancient Oceania, it is easy to see how an over 50 kya timeline for arrival in Australia was reached—but there is a problem.
Two studies recently published in Nature and Science both find that Neanderthal interbreeding with anatomically modern humans occurred only once, in Europe, between approximately 43.5 kya and 51.5 kya.
Previous evidence shows that all current modern humans outside of Africa carry approximately 2% Neanderthal DNA in their genomes. If the Neanderthal DNA in indigenous Sahul populations matches that of other populations, it could place a hard limit on when their ancestors made the journey.
In the study, "Recent DNA Studies Question a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul," published in Archaeology in Oceania, researchers conducted a comparative analysis of Neanderthal and Denisovan genetic signatures in living Sahul populations to determine whether they align with other non-African populations.
Evidence shows that living Sahul populations carry approximately 2% Neanderthal DNA in their genomes, with no dilution of Neanderthal ancestry in Sahulians compared to other non-African populations has been observed.
Denisovan ancestry in Sahul ranges between 2% and 5%. No substantial admixture is detected from Homo erectus, Homo floresiensis, or Homo luzonensis.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Researchers conclude that genetic evidence does not support a timeline earlier than approximately 50 kya for human settlement in Sahul. Findings suggest a scenario in which modern humans dispersed rapidly eastward after Neanderthal interbreeding, later acquiring Denisovan genetic signatures during movement through Asia.
While genomic evidence supports this less than 50 kya scenario, it leaves looming large questions about the evidence showing much older occupation. It could be evidence of an earlier expansion of current modern humans who either died out, avoided Neanderthal admixture out of Africa, or only minimally contributed to current population genetics.
Not covered in the current study is the possibility of a non-current modern human presence. The recent genomic identification of a Homo longi skull from the 146k-year-old "Dragon Man" from Harbin, northeastern China, along with even older evidence from Tibet show that Denisovans have a long history across East Asia, inhabiting a wide range of habitats.
If there were Denisovan populations in Sahul or in the greater Oceania island region, it might explain some of the earliest site evidence.
Some previous research has already found that the indigenous Ayta Magbukon people in the Philippines, who retain the highest levels of Denisovan gene admixture in the world at up to 9%, were found to have experienced an independent Denisovan admixture event than the next highest group, Australians and Papuans (at up to 6% Denisovan admixture).
Regardless of the next prevailing framework that emerges from the inclusion of new genome-based tools and improved site-dating methods, the history that people write for themselves based on science or myth will likely be overturned a few more times by the irreverent research of archaeological anthropologists.
Jim Allen et al, Recent DNA Studies Question a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul, Archaeology in Oceania (2025). DOI: 10.1002/arco.70002
Comments