More Warnings on Stargate: Extinction Risks? By Brian Simpson
The Stargate project, announced by Trump, was launched by Big Tech elites singing its virtues, such as more surveillance, and the creation of AI mRNA cancer vaccines, among other vaccines. The later has disturbed critics, although I think the open statement by its champions that Stargate will move surveillance to a new level, is also alarming. But, according to someone in the know with tech, former Robert Kennedy Jr. running mate Nicole Shanahan, Stargate could lead to a human "extinction event." She is concerned about the mRNA platform itself, and health risks from widespread use, far wider than occurred with the Covid vaxxes, if this project gets under way.
"What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use," Shanahan said. "One of the reasons why is it delivers an inconsistent result in individuals."
"They think that you can program the human body as you program an AI system, as you program a computer system. And the trouble with that mentality is that nature…there's an element to it that when you interject something like the mRNA vaccine, there's a huge amount of stochastic randomness that can occur," she noted.
"AI is a computer system. Human health is not," she said. But the Stargate proponents, as transhumanists of various shades, do not see it like that. Hence the real and present danger.
"The distribution of AI-driven mRNA cancer vaccines for individuals as part of President Donald Trump's Stargate Project could lead to an "extinction event," warns former RFK Jr. running mate Nicole Shanahan.
In an appearance on Megyn Kelly's podcast Wednesday, Shanahan, a Silicon Valley attorney and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 2024 running mate, called for a moratorium on experimental mRNA technology because they already raise health concerns since the long-term effects are not yet fully understood.
"What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use," Shanahan said. "One of the reasons why is it delivers an inconsistent result in individuals."
Shanahan went on to explain how 5% of those who received the experimental COVID-19 mRNA jabs during the plandemic didn't get the expected results — instead, many ended up with "turbo cancers," "blood clots" and other adverse side effects, and others were even harmed as a result of spike protein "shedding."
"In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being," she said.
Kelly added, "Until it's not Russian roulette to take it."
Shanahan pointed out that many engineers and pharmacological researchers working on the development of the mRNA tech are overlooking a fundamental truth about human biology: it can't be programmed the way a computer system can.
"They think that you can program the human body as you program an AI system, as you program a computer system. And the trouble with that mentality is that nature…there's an element to it that when you interject something like the mRNA vaccine, there's a huge amount of stochastic randomness that can occur," she noted.
"AI is a computer system. Human health is not," she added.
Shanahan also criticized the fact that mRNA vaccine tech was at the forefront of Trump's Stargate announcement given AI could be deployed in many other ways that directly benefit the U.S. economy.
"There's so many that could have been shared in yesterday's conference that are really excellent uses of AI," she said. "I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event. So I think we need to be careful."
"Whoa!" Kelly responded.
During the announcement of the $500 billion Stargate joint venture at the White House Tuesday, Oracle CTO Larry Ellison gushed over the potential health breakthroughs AI could make for cancer, specifically using the deployment of mRNA tech to curate individualized vaccines for treatment.
"Cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test," Ellison said. "Then once we gene-sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer."
https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/why-did-he-do-it-and-is-maha-finished
"Whatever goodwill Trump garnered with his first day's avalanche of executive orders has largely been neutralized, and certainly outshined, by his now-infamous stunt with the creepiest trio of out-of-touch billionaire tech sociopaths one could possibly assemble for a single event — who make Elon Musk look like Joe Six-Pack Football Fan Taxpayer Bricklayer.
He may not realize or fully appreciate what he's done to alienate his base, which was already, to be diplomatic, extremely skeptical of how he would approach the bio-terrorists in government and industry currently leading humanity to annihilation and dystopia — many, would argue, on purpose for depopulation purposes.
Or maybe he doesn't care because he'll be done anyway after this term.
Or maybe all of that tech oligarch campaign support came with a price tag.
Or maybe he's got a proverbial gun to his head.
Whatever the reason, the condescendingly named "Stargate Project" — meant to appeal to mouth-breathers' sci-fi sensibilities — is clearly not what MAHA voted for.
Others have elaborated on why the "AI is going to generate mRNA cancer vaccines within 48 hours of a cancer diagnosis" pitch is marketing bulls**t, and why the sleazeballs hawking it aren't to be trusted, so I won't belabor the point here.
Rather, why did he do it, and what can we learn from this to titrate our expectations of what he's going to do with his second term?
A few possible reasons:
Trump is a notorious germophobe … Presumably, then, he might also be worried about other non-infectious diseases like cancer, particularly given his advanced age.
Trump's campaign got bankrolled by tech oligarchs unlike any in modern history. They didn't do that for nothing; presumably, deals were made either implicitly or explicitly that autistic tech sociopaths were going to have carte blanche.
Trump is very famously easily impressed by extreme wealth and accolades, which is why his meeting with Bill Gates that reportedly went swimmingly, according to Gates, should have surprised no one.
There is some under-the-table angle in it for him financially.
He really has been convinced that AI is going to make mRNA "cancer vaccines" — another silly and condescending term — that produce the promised results because he doesn't know or care how this stuff works and he gets bulls**t whispered into his ear non-stop by grifters.
Of course, although I'm not one who believes motivations don't matter at all, at some point asking why becomes a philosophical road to nowhere; he did it, he's evidently going to do nothing to rein in the mRNA profiteers death-marching us into disease and death, and now we're going to have to live with the consequences as guinea pigs in a global transhumanist experience when bird flu drops and a magic cure appears on the market six months later that everyone is forced to take at gunpoint by corporate and state and local-level government fiat (in blue areas, at least) or starve alone in their homes.
But at least he got us out of the WHO, right? comes the chorus of MAGA apologists and die-hards.
To which I say: At least he did that. Sure.
And possibly a ban on gain-of-function research (excluding private-sector firms, excluding bird flu), if anonymous sources leaking to the Wall Street Journal are to be trusted.
Gift-horses, mouths, etc.
Yes, Trump can be influenced to do good things. But what a hell of a double-edged sword that is — hence the reason the real war for the soul of the nation is, and always was, who has Trump's ear while he's in the White House."
Comments