Meat is Natural: Defending Our Right to Eat What Humans were Made For! By Mrs Vera West and Brian Simpson

Should lions, tigers, and wolves be forced to abandon their prey and munch on lentils to save the planet? The idea is laughable, carnivores are built to eat meat, and so are humans. Yet, the anti-meat brigade, backed by corporate giants and globalist agendas, wants us to believe that animal protein is a death sentence. A groundbreaking McMaster University study, published in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (2025), demolishes this myth, finding no increased mortality risk from animal protein and even a slight reduction in cancer deaths. With 16,000 adults tracked over decades, this research exposes the war on meat as a profit-driven scam, not science. Meat-eating is as natural as breathing, humans have thrived on it for millennia, and no amount of vegan propaganda or lab-grown slop can change that.

The McMaster Study: A Stake Through Anti-Meat Lies

The McMaster study, led by Professor Stuart Phillips, analysed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), using advanced statistical methods like the NCI method and MCMC modelings to track protein intake and mortality. Its findings are explosive: animal protein doesn't increase death risk from any cause, heart disease, cancer, or otherwise. In fact, higher animal protein intake was linked to a modest but significant drop in cancer mortality, unlike plant protein, which showed no such benefit. This directly contradicts decades of fearmongering from vegan advocacy groups and Big Food, who've pushed the narrative that meat causes cancer and heart disease.

Past studies, often funded by vested interests like Impossible Foods or Beyond Meat, leaned on flawed food-frequency questionnaires and ignored key variables: processed meats vs. organic, grass-fed cuts; cooking methods (grilling creates carcinogens, slow-cooking doesn't); and the nutritional deficiencies of ultra-processed plant-based substitutes. ZeroHedge (August 27, 2025) notes that these studies, tied to Big Pharma and globalist entities like the World Economic Forum, conveniently overlooked the superiority of clean animal protein. The McMaster study, using rigorous data, sets the record straight: meat isn't the enemy, bad science and corporate agendas are.

Meat: A Biological Imperative

Humans are omnivores, evolved over 2.5 million years to eat meat. Nature (2022) confirms early hominins relied on animal protein for brain development, with evidence of butchered bones dating to 2.6 million years ago. Meat provides bioavailable nutrients, vitamin B12, iron, zinc, and essential amino acids, that plants struggle to match. The Lancet (2023) found 20% of vegans deficient in B12, linked to neurological issues, while Journal of Nutrition (2024) shows animal protein supports muscle maintenance, critical for aging populations. Forcing humans to abandon meat is like telling lions to eat lentils, biologically absurd.

The reductio ad absurdum drives this home. Lions, obligate carnivores, would starve on a lentil diet, their bodies unable to process plant nutrients efficiently. Humans, while omnivorous, face similar risks with meat-free diets: Nutrients (2023) reports higher rates of anemia (15%) and depression (10%) in vegans due to nutrient gaps. If we wouldn't ban lions from meat, why shame humans for eating what fuelled our evolution? The anti-meat push ignores biology, prioritising ideology over health.

The Corporate Conspiracy Behind Anti-Meat Narratives

The war on meat isn't about saving lives or the planet, it's about control and profit. ZeroHedge exposes the globalist agenda, led by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates, to replace real food with patented alternatives like lab-grown meat and insect protein. Gates, a major investor in Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods, stands to profit from meat bans, with Forbes (2024) estimating his food-tech portfolio at $1.2 billion. These synthetic foods, loaded with seed oils and GMO additives, are nutritional disasters, Food Chemistry (2023) found plant-based burgers have 20% less protein and higher sodium than beef.

The climate argument is equally flimsy. Livestock contributes 14.5% of global emissions (FAO, 2023), but industrial agriculture and transportation dwarf this at 30% and 25%. Grass-fed systems, like those here in Australia, sequester carbon, per Soil Science Society (2024). Yet, globalists push "sustainability" to justify meat restrictions, ignoring that patented fake meat requires energy-intensive labs. The Guardian (2025) reports lab-grown meat's carbon footprint can exceed beef's by 25% in some scenarios. The real goal? Monopolise food systems, leaving consumers dependent on corporate slop.

The Real Risks: Processed Junk, Not Meat

The McMaster study underscores a critical distinction: processed meats (bacon, hot dogs) and plant-based substitutes, not clean animal protein, are the health culprits. WHO (2015) linked processed meats to a 18% higher cancer risk, but unprocessed red meat showed no such link in Annals of Internal Medicine (2019). Meanwhile, Nutrients (2024) found vegan "meat" products contain up to 50% less bioavailable protein and higher levels of inflammatory seed oils. The Telegraph (2025) warns these ultra-processed foods drive obesity and diabetes, with UK vegan product sales linked to a 10% rise in metabolic issues.

Quality matters. Grass-fed beef, free of hormones, delivers omega-3s and CLA, reducing inflammation (Journal of Animal Science, 2023). Organic poultry and eggs provide choline, vital for brain health. Balance is key, pair meat with vegetables and healthy fats, not fries. The anti-meat narrative conflates a Big Mac with a grass-fed steak, a deliberate misdirection to scare consumers.

Defending Our Plates

Meat-eating is natural, healthy, and human. The McMaster study proves it: animal protein doesn't kill you, it may even protect against cancer. Forcing humans to ditch meat is as absurd as banning lions from hunting. The real threat is corporate greed, pushing patented, nutrient-poor alternatives under the guise of health and climate salvation. The Australian (2025) notes 70% of Aussies reject meat bans, favouring local, organic sources. Consumers should demand transparency, check funding behind anti-meat studies, support regenerative farmers, and savour that steak. Our ancestors ate meat to survive; we eat it to thrive. Don't let globalists take that away!

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-08-26-anti-meat-study-animal-protein-lower-cancer.html