Mass Murderer Who Killed Three Children at the Taylor Swift Dance had an Al Qaeda Training Manual! By Richard Miller (Europe)
After the murder of three young White British girls at a Taylor Swift theme dance class, a rumour began on that the murderer was an immigrant, and a potentially radical Muslim. The rumour was false, as the non-White was born in the UK from immigrant parents. This led to riots by anti-immigrant mobs and counter-riots by Muslim men, with Muslims prowling the streets with weapons such as machetes, illegal in the UK, but without a single arrest of a Muslim by the woke British police.
The tyrannical anti-White UK authorities under Starmer, responded by squashing the little that remained of free speech in multicultural fascist Britain, with the government making it a crime to incite "racial hatred" or post "false communications," as their regime defined it. Then British jails were emptied of prisoners, mainly non-Whites, so that White British protesters, some who only witnessed the riots and did not harm at all, or merely posted social media comments, could be placed in a modern gulag equivalent of the US Democrat prisoners of January 6.
Thus, the killer of the young girls and stabber of a number of other people, was sidelined. The 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, turned out to be neither an immigrant nor a Muslim, it is true, but the authorities knew but did not out release one crucial piece of information: last week, it was revealed that the authorities had found an al-Qaeda training manual "Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al-Qaeda Training Manual" in Rudakubana's possession. Rudakubana, has also been charged with producing the deadly poison ricin, used in terrorist attacks, the poison found in his residence, and the terrorist manual on his computer. This is the person that the multicultural fascist state and media protected at the time, while pathologically turning upon native British White people. This is a regime, rotten to the core.
https://www.thefp.com/p/douglas-murray-british-police-taylor-swift-killer-terrorist-al-qaeda
"The teenager accused in a stabbing rampage that killed three girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in England has been charged with producing the deadly poison ricin and now faces a terror offense for possessing a jihadi training manual, police said Tuesday.
Axel Rudakubana, 18, who is charged with murdering three girls and stabbing 10 other people in July, produced the deadly poison ricin that was later found in his home, Merseyside Police said. Police also found he had a computer file with an Al-Qaida training manual titled: "Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al-Qaeda Training Manual."
The new charges against Rudakubana are for allegedly making a biological toxin, ricin, which violates a law prohibiting biological weapons in the U.K., and for "possessing information, namely a pdf file … of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism," police said. The latter charge is barred under the terms of a U.K. terrorism law.
And nowhere has this trick been more visible than in the response of our hapless elite class to the horrific atrocities that were committed in Southport, where three precious little girls –Elsie Dot Stancombe, Bebe King, and Alice Da Silva Aguiar–were brutally murdered at a dance class, while many more were nearly stabbed to death.
https://substack.com/@mattgoodwin/note/c-74876910?utm_source=notes-share-action
Matt Goodwin writes;
I don't know about you but in the hours, days and weeks that followed it became immediately clear to me that we were, once again, being "managed".
Once again, those who asked questions were instantly warned about "misinformation" while actual information about the suspect was suppressed or downplayed.
Interestingly, the few details that were initially released appeared to be ones designed to calm tension, telling people the accused was "Cardiff-born" and his parents were "a lovely couple", which I'd suggest simply made little sense to most people.
Into this vacuum then arrived all the usual stories about "solidarity" and communities "coming together", much like what followed the bombing of our children at the Manchester Evening News Arena by "British" citizen Salman Abedi, or the horrific murder of Sir David Amess MP by "British" citizen Ali Harbi Ali.
All of this, too, was rapidly contrasted with stark warnings about the "far right", which has not been a serious force in this country for years, to essentially warn people off asking deeper questions about what is going on in our country.
A small minority who were unable to control their anger and rage rioted and were, rightly, sent to jail. But so too were many people who, often writing online in their own homes, drew a line from the atrocity in Southport to immigration and Islam.
One protestor, grandfather Peter Lynch, later died in prison, while many others who protested peacefully or merely asked questions found themselves being casually and crudely denounced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper as "far-right thugs", both of whom also not just downplayed but completely ignored the suggestion this may have something to do with immigration and Islam.
People from the left-leaning elite class, meanwhile, who had previously taken only minutes to brand past attacks as "far-right terrorism" suddenly urged caution and delay, while quickly moving the discussion on to debates about how best to clamp down on free speech and free expression in our country. As I wrote at the time:
"They want us to talk about regulating social media. They want us to talk about shutting down alternative views. They want us to spend our time demonising counter-cultural writers who have been validated by current events as 'far-right enablers', 'apologists', and 'grifters', whose voice should no longer be permitted in a tightly-controlled public square. They want us, in short, to talk about anything and everything except how their have pushed us to this point –to breaking point".
And I, too, experienced this first-hand after publishing a viral essay on this Substack in which I dared to give voice to what millions of people out there were very clearly thinking and suspecting —that the atrocities in Southport quite obviously did have something to do with mass immigration, radical Islamism, and the simple fact that, as I said at the time, "we've let too many people into the country who hate who we are".
In response, I was promptly hauled before the elite class like somebody who had been accused of witchcraft in Salem. Prominent 'conservative' columnist Tim Montgomerie denounced this suggestion as 'incendiary' and demanded my voice be shut down.
In debates with the BBC's Nick Robinson and Al Jazeera's Mehdi Hasan, I was heavily criticised if not vilified for drawing a line from the attacks to immigration and Islamism. Even daring to suggest these things, Robinson said, was equivalent to Enoch Powell's infamous 'Rivers of Blood' speech or, Hasan, 'far-right Islamophobia'.
What could the Southport attacks possibly have to do with immigration or Islam, they asked, speaking for an elite class that believes those who arrived in the country only yesterday, who might have a passport and can speak our language, are just as English or British as those of us whose roots have been on these islands for generations?
Well, now we know. Now we know that the Southport attack does have something to do with these very issues. I don't know if it's the discovery, this week, that the son of Rwandan immigrants tried to make the deadly biological weapon ricin or that he downloaded an al-Qaeda training manual for Islamist terrorists titled 'Military Studies in the Jihad Against Tyrants', which offers advice on urban warfare, terrorist tactics, and how to establish terrorist cells, that has left me thinking we might not have been given the full story about this 'Welshman'.
Furthermore, I'd hazard a guess that many people in the corridors of power have known a lot more about this story than they've been letting on. As anybody who has worked in Number 10 knows, as Dominic Cummings pointed out this week, despite what we're being told, despite all the talk about "misinformation" or "disinformation", it is in fact highly likely that Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper, and the authorities would have known almost immediately about this information.
So, as I said in a video this week, which has now been viewed more than 100,000 times, on behalf of the British people I have a few questions because, like them, I am utterly sick and tired of being managed and subjected to this misinformation trick.
Here's what I want to know.
I want to know when, exactly, did the police, Crown Prosecution Service, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper know about this latest information? Was it before or while they were accusing people of "misinformation" and "disinformation"? Was it before they derided people as "far-right thugs" and "criminals" who now, it appears, might have been on the money in pointing the finger directly at radical Islamism? Was it before some of these people were hurled in jail? Why was this information not made available sooner? And why was it released now, interestingly only twenty-four hours before a major fiscal event, the budget, which is dominating the news cycle and only a few days before a major election in America?
The elite class don't want you to ask these questions.
Comments