Mass Immigration and the Future of Britain and Australia: A Tale of Two Nations Creating White Minorities, By Richard Miller (Londonistan) and James Reed
Matthew Goodwin's recent Telegraph article, echoed by the Daily Sceptic, sounds a stark alarm: mass immigration is transforming Britain beyond recognition, with white Britons projected to become a minority by 2063, the foreign-born and their descendants a majority by 2079, and Islam potentially practiced by one in four people by 2100. These shifts, driven by record-high foreign-born mothers (over 40% of babies in England in 2024), are framed as a democratic failure, enacted without public consent. Across the globe, similar concerns arise in Australia, where critics like David Llewellyn-Smith and Trevor Loudon accuse Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of fostering demographic change through Chinese immigration and international student policies. For aging populations in both nations, these transformations raise questions about identity, security, and access to resources like healthcare.Britain and Australia are hurtling toward irreversible change, which some argue will result in civil war.
Goodwin's core claim is that Britain's rapid demographic shift is unprecedented and undemocratic. Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows that 40% of babies in England in 2024 were born to foreign-born mothers, up from 30% a decade ago. By 2063, white Britons are projected to be a minority, with the foreign-born and their descendants dominating by 2079. Islam's rise, potentially one in four people by 2100, adds cultural complexity, especially as many immigrants hail from nations like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iraq, with norms Goodwin describes as "radically different, if not incompatible."
He argues this transformation lacks public mandate, citing polls showing consistent public support for lower immigration over 30 years. X posts amplify this sentiment, with users like @LD_Sceptics and @toadmeister warning of "cultural breakdown" and a "demographic spiral."Policy Exchange's report further criticises the graduate visa route, noting that 40% of 2023 student visa holders transitioned to other visas, up from 3% in 2019, suggesting universities are a "backdoor" to migration, as in Australia. Government data predicts 543,000 more foreign nationals in Birmingham alone by 2047, underscoring the scale.
In Australia, there are fears that Albanese's policies, encouraging Chinese students (150,000 in 2024) and travel (580,500 visitors in 2024), are shifting demographics toward China's orbit. Critics like Llewellyn-Smith and Loudwins, claim this aligns with a pro-China pivot, risking Australia's Western identity. The immigration lobby trots out the tired old argument that there is a skills shortage, but Macrobusiness.com.au, has shown that there is an over-supply of low skilled migrants; even Asian university students, coming as migrants from the university route to migration, are ending up in low skilled service jobs. But that is the point, their race is the most important thing for the government, which has a Great White Replacement immigration policy.
Unlike Britain, Australia's immigration debate centres on economic dependence (71% of gas exports to China) and security risks from Chinese influence, not cultural incompatibility, but this issue is fast approaching. The UK faces more immediate demographic pressure, with 10,000 small boat crossings in 2025 and a higher foreign-born birth rate. Australia's student-driven migration is more subtle, as the internationals are filtered in. Both nations, however, grapple with public discontent over rapid change, as seen in X posts decrying "uncontrolled" immigration.
Demographic Shifts: Britain's transformation is faster, with white Britons projected as a minority by 2063 and foreign-born majorities by 2079. Australia's demographic change is slower, driven by economic migration (e.g., Chinese students), not mass cultural shifts. The UK's higher foreign-born birth rate (40% vs. Australia's ~30%) signals greater immediate impact.
Cultural Concerns: Goodwin warns of "incompatible" cultures from non-European immigrants, amplified by X posts claiming English is "vanishing" from classrooms. Australia's concerns focus on Chinese influence, not cultural erosion, with less emphasis on religious or linguistic divides, so far, but it will come.
Economic Drivers: Both nations rely on immigration to supposedly counter aging populations and low birth rates, which it does not do. The UK's welfare state, costing £296.3 billion in 2023–24, faces collapse without reform.
Political Response: The UK's Labour government struggles with "political hedonism," unable to cut welfare or migration due to voter backlash, as the ethnic lobby is now an election changer. Australia's Albanese balances trade with security, but critics demand stronger defence spending (2.3% of GDP).
The UK appears closer to McGrogan's "big crash" due to fiscal and cultural pressures, while Australia's challenges are more geopolitical, for the time, but its white minority could be well before 2060, maybe even by 2040, about the same time as America's. Australia is on exactly the same road to national suicide as Britain, without a mass, legal revolt of the people.
"In the Telegraph, Matthew Goodwin warns that mass immigration is reshaping Britain beyond recognition, with white Britons set to become a minority by 2063. Here's an excerpt:
Unless things change, and change fast, the population of the UK will be permanently transformed by mass immigration. White Britons will become a minority by the year 2063. The foreign-born and their immediate descendants will become a majority by 2079. And nearly one in four people in the UK will be following Islam by the year 2100; this figure would rise to around one in three among under-40s.
Many people struggle to make sense of the pace and scale of these changes. They ask how a nation can be transformed this fast without the consent of the governed.
But, last week, brand new data from the Office for National Statistics has made it abundantly clear that these trends are already well underway.
The findings are indeed shocking: more than one in three babies that were born in England and Wales last year have mothers who were not born in the UK; this rises to more than 40% for babies in England, a record high and up by nearly 10-points in less than a decade. …
This issue goes to the heart of our democracy: we didn't vote for this. We have a political system and a ruling class that is no longer responsive to an electorate that has, for much of the last thirty years, been consistent in asking for less immigration and slower demographic change. …
Mass immigration also matters, secondly, for a more profound reason: it changes how we talk and think about things like Britishness and Englishness. With the foreign-born and their descendants now forecast to become a majority on these islands by the year 2079, the country will now be reshaped around a population that has a much "thinner" sense of national identity. …
These challenges will be compounded by the fact that the foreign-born now often hail not from Europe but radically different, if not incompatible cultures, from Pakistan and Afghanistan to Iraq.
The more babies who are born in the UK to mothers and fathers from such backgrounds, the more likely it is that the norms, traditions, religions and ways of life from these nations will be transplanted to England and Wales. …
As things stand, many of our leaders would rather cross their fingers and hope that this radical experiment with mass uncontrolled immigration works out.
But there are good reasons to think it will not, and those reasons are becoming increasingly visible by the day."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/07/06/mass-migration-will-change-britain-beyond-recognition/
Comments