I mention this post by Covid critic Marc Girardot, for the sake of completeness. As I understand it, he seems to be saying that most covid injuries arise from inadvertent intravenous injections, the Bolus theory. Presumably, if the injections were done right, there would be no problem, or less of a problem. Yet, I think this account falls short of the evidence which shows that there is migration of the mRNA spike protein from the injection site, which then travels to all organs of the body, including the brain, heart and ovaries.  No doubt, flawed injections make matters worse, but I do not see this as the entire story, as detailed in the material to follow.

https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/when-and-how-can-vaccine-particles?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

“In this article, I attempt to give a wholistic view on the processes by which adverse effects happen in the hope that it will help as many people as possible address jointly with their physicians their vaccine-induced illness.

This week has been particularly difficult for me as the more I re-engage with my friends and the world, and the more I see the damage done by these successive immunisation campaigns.

To this day, I count around me at least 16 people hurt: 5 died of which 2 were healthy and < 65, 3 had strokes, 2 had to have their heart operated… it’s a mess. I am convinced many more have been hurt around me, but the vast majority are blind to the reality that they have damaged their body and that there’s no turning back.

Tuesday night, I had a nice one-on-one dinner with an old friend in Paris. We hadn’t spoken seriously in a long time. When we last spoke, I had sensed that he had been injured by the vaccine. But - like everybody else - my brain had dismissed that thought … anything to get away from more stress and anguish.

As we progressed through our conversation, I learnt that in the past 18 months, he had lost 30% of his lungs, had needed an emergency heart operation to extract a blood clot, and that his gallbladder was now entirely dysfunctional and needed to be removed … doctors gave him absolutely no explanation! Not one single hypothesis. Grrr…

It’s saddening and infuriating for me to have failed at preventing most of my friends and a great many of my loved ones from these shots. Identifying now signs of vaccine injury on them makes for a sad look on someone one loves…

Having done a year-long deep-dive in the epidemiology and immunology of the SARS-Cov-2 epidemic, mid-January 2021, it was evident to me that these vaccines were seriously hurting people. One could see that something was seriously wrong in the overnight - New Year’s Eve - instantaneous reversal of the COVID death curves: that was an epidemiological impossibility! COVID deaths had been falling since mid-November, a sign Susceptibles were depleted. Immunocompromised Susceptibles simply can’t be created overnight. And the variant narrative was easy to dispel for my friend Mike Yeadon and I. The synchronicity of this renewed COVID death momentum, synchronous with the rapid implementation of vaccines, was a clear red flag. This all didn’t make sense. The vaccination was causing harm in a grand scale.

To the exception of Dr. Roger Hodkinson, Dr. Mike Yeadon and a few others, most of my fellow Panda members were in denial. Our exchanges were quite emotional, non-scientific and quite frankly frustrating. On the one side, some of us were projecting the disaster unfolding, and the moral weight on our shoulders was crushing. And on the other, understandably and quite naturally, many had vaccinated their families and the slightest doubt on the innocuity of the vaccination wasn’t acceptable to their psyche. The sad perspective was too heavy to bear for many: people don’t want to know the future, and certainly not if they’ve inadvertently poisoned their kids, or their parents. We’ve been fighting this paradox ever since. Worse, once hurt, many people become even more dependent on the healthcare system, and sadly doubting isn’t even an option for them to consider.

I won’t mention the immense societal pressure we all faced, and still face. Doubting vaccines was more than sinful and the risk was - and still is - modern-day excommunication. A whole civilisation like a drowning man panicking who ends up beating and drowning the life-guard who came to save him…

In the end, I don’t think I ever convinced anyone. The reality finally caught up to the vast majority of Panda members some eight or nine months later, better than most… now it’s a reality to all of them. Frustrated, stressed, lonely, I dove into the science, into root cause analyses, into visualising what was happening with these vaccines particles. I met Steve Kirsch and another team of wonderful people, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Peter McCullough, Matthew Crawford … who early had opened their eyes to this living nightmare.

Having worked for a company who had developed 2 anti-cancer therapeutic vaccines, visualisation of cells “infected” by cancer and the dynamics of immune cells was second nature to me… I just needed to work, observe the data, question the facts, get more data, draw more hypotheses, and validate or invalidate them. That’s what I do for a living as a consultant, and here is where that process and hard work has brought me today. The understanding of how these vaccines are hurting people. Get ready for a morbid deep dive.

 

Why the Bolus Theory stands

Many of my friends tell me: “Marc, there has to be more to it than your theory” as if that statement were a scientific certainty. They might well be right, but the Bolus theory stands firmly and explains most - if not all - the injuries observed. Nearly all steps in the theory detailed herein are either proven or confirmed indirectly. Hardly any conjecture. It is noteworthy to remember that the Bolus Theory is:

• Factual: Inadvertent intravenous injections are a clinical realityin many fields.
  • Dentists¹know full well about that risk with anaesthetics, and use the aspiration technique daily to avoid accidents.
  • Plastic surgeonsalso know the risk of injecting hyaluronic acid fillers accidentally intravenously.
  • Anesthesiologists²equally know that risk, notably for epidural injections.
  • So do bodybuilderswith steroids.
  • Accidental intravascular injections are well documented and lead to numerous pathologies like gangrene, heart failure, blindness…similar to many adverse effects we are witnessing today, even with other products.
• Consistent with existing practicesin medical and drug delivery:
  • as early as 1936, accidental IV injection have been known to cause allergic shocks.
  • the sheer existence and the past wide adoption of “the aspiration technique” demonstrates vividly the reality of that risk.
  • to deliver rapidly a drug to the heart or other organs, the medical profession doesn’t use a saline bag, it creates a bolus via a rapid intravenous injection.
• Material:
  • In dentistry: aspiration proved positive in 4% of casesin nerve block procedure, and in 11% of mandibular blocks!
  • In bodybuilding: 2% of steroid injection - despite aspiration !- were intravascular³.
  • Many observations have shown that numerous injections are not done according to the procedure. They are often inserted below the safe zone,or with an angle that can hit sub-cutaneous veins⁴.
  • Another study showed that many high BMI patients have a significant risk of coming short.”

Here is alternative material on the issue of abnormal blood clotting

https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/covid-vaccine-and-blood-clots

“Abnormal blood clotting was one of the first mysterious health effects to emerge in the COVID pandemic, first, as an effect of the natural infection, and later, as a side effect of the COVID jabs.

By mid-March 2021, barely four months after the rollout of the COVID injections, 19 European countries plus Thailand¹ had suspended the use of AstraZeneca’s injection, either in full or in part, following reports of deadly blood clots.^2 3

Contrary to the Moderna and Pfizer shots, the AstraZeneca jab uses a viral vector — a genetically modified and supposedly noninfectious chimpanzee cold virus — to deliver double-stranded DNA for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into your cells.⁴

Earlier that month, The Defender had reported⁵ U.K. data showing the AstraZeneca jab was responsible for 77% more adverse events and 25% more deaths than the Pfizer shot. Around that same time, doctors at Oslo University Hospital also announced that the blood clotting disorders experienced by some recipients of the AstraZeneca shot were in fact caused by the injection.⁶ A March 18, 2021, article in Science Norway read, in part:⁷

“‘Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed,’ says professor and chief physician Pål Andre Holme … ‘In collaboration with experts in the field from the University Hospital of North Norway HF, we have found specific antibodies against blood platelets that can cause these reactions ... the chief physician explains …

When asked to clarify why he says ‘most likely’ in the quote, Holme confidently responds that the reason for these rare cases of blood clots has been found.

‘We have the reason. Nothing but the vaccine can explain why these individuals had this immune response,’ he states. [Norwegian national newspaper] VG also asks how Holme can know that the immune response is not caused by something other than the vaccine.

‘There is nothing in the patient history of these individuals that can give such a powerful immune response. I am confident that the antibodies that we have found are the cause, and I see no other explanation than it being the vaccine which triggers it,’ he responds.”

Study Details Mechanism of Action

In early December 2021, a team of international scientists published a paper⁸ detailing the mechanism behind the AstraZeneca jab’s propensity to trigger blood clots. As reported by the Daily Mail at the time:⁹

“A team of international experts, involving researchers from AstraZeneca, say that in a very small number of cases — about one in 100,000 in the UK — the vaccine can set off a chain reaction which leads to the body confusing its own blood platelets for fragments of virus ...

They found that the shell of the vector vaccine — the weakened cold virus used to teach cells how to neutralize COVID — sometimes acts like a magnet and attracts platelets, a protein found in the blood.

For reasons the scientists are still probing, the body then mistakes these platelets as a threat and produces antibodies to fight them. The combination of the platelets and the antibodies clumping together leads to the formation of dangerous blood clots ...

Essentially, after being delivered into the body adenovirus binds with a specific protein in the blood, known as platelet factor 4 (PF4), which is normally used by the body to promote coagulation in case of injury.

Using incredibly detailed images of the adenovirus in the vaccine the scientists demonstrated the adenovirus in the Oxford-AstraZeneca is negatively charged, and could attract positively charged proteins like a magnet.

The researchers believe that in a case of 'mistaken identity' the body's immune system considers this platelet cluster as threat and releases antibodies to attack it, clumping together to it and triggering potentially life threatening blood clots. This condition is called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).”

The following graphic was published in the Daily Mail to illustrate the potentially deadly chain reaction.

 

How Long Does Risk Remain?

As for how long the risk of blood clotting remains is unknown. In mid-September 2022, the American Heart Association reported that the risk of abnormal blood clotting remains elevated nearly a year after natural infection:¹⁰

“People who got COVID-19 had a higher risk of dangerous blood clots for close to a year later, according to a large new study¹¹ on the aftereffects of a SARS-CoV-2 infection ...

COVID-19 was linked to a sharply increased risk of blood clot-related issues — including heart attack and stroke — immediately after diagnosis compared to people who never had COVID-19 [and] ... that risk remained higher for some problems up to 49 weeks later ...

Researchers found that the first week after a COVID-19 diagnosis, the risk of an arterial blood clot — the kind that could cause a heart attack or ischemic stroke by blocking blood flow to the heart or brain — was nearly 22 times higher than in someone without COVID-19. That risk dropped sharply, to less than four times higher, in the second week.

‘Between 27 and 49 weeks, there is an approximately 30% increased risk for arterial clots,’ [senior author, professor of medical statistics and epidemiology at the University of Bristol, Jonathan] Sterne said. ‘But the elevation is greater for longer’ for clots in veins, which include deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, when a clot travels to the lungs.

In the first week after a COVID-19 diagnosis, the risk of such venous problems was 33 times higher. By the third and fourth weeks after diagnosis, the risk was still about eight times higher. And between 27 and 49 weeks later, the risk was still 1.8 times higher than in somebody who had never had COVID-19.”

If the risk of blood clotting remains high for nearly a year after natural infection, it seems reasonable to suspect the risk is dramatically elevated far longer in those who got one or more COVID shots, as their bodies are now producing the toxic spike protein internally, and there’s no known off-switch.

We still do not know how long the human body continues to produce spike protein after a COVID jab. And, while AstraZeneca was singled out as the main culprit of blood clots, Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA jabs are no safer in this regard.

Pfizer’s COVID Jab Linked to Blood Clotting Disorder

As early as June 2021, Israeli research suggested there was a link between the Pfizer shot and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), which is very similar to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or VITT. A list of distinguishing features between the syndromes can be found on UpToDate.com.¹² As reported by The Defender:¹³

“Scientists with the Institute of Hematology at Shamir Medical Center said they began researching the possible link after reports of a sudden increase in TTP across Israel — four cases detected in one month compared to two or three cases per year. TTP is an autoimmune disorder that causes blood clots to form in small blood vessels throughout the body ...

The medical team said they found a ‘chronological connection’ between vaccination and the onset of TTP symptoms. They stressed this occurred in both new patients and in patients with pre-existing TTP whose disease had been in remission but flared up soon after getting the vaccine ...

As The Defender reported in April, U.S. regulatory officials were alerted as far back as December 2020 that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines — like AstraZeneca and J&J COVID vaccine — could pose similar risks of blood clots.”

Even before the rollout of the shots, experts warned that blood clots and cardiovascular problems were predictable. Among them were Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist, who in a letter¹⁴ to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned that the shots could “cause microvascular injury and blood clots throughout the body including the brain, heart, liver and kidneys, in ways that were not assessed in the safety trials.”

He pointed out that studies looking at the natural infection had found that “viral proteins appear to cause tissue damage without actively replicating virus,” and if that was true, he suspected the spike protein produced in response to the jabs might also cause the same kind of damage. Today, ample evidence points to Whelan’s suspicions being correct.

Jabs May Raise Risk of COVID Death Over Time

Studies are now also coming out with evidence that the shots may be causing antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), and that they kill heart and brain cells. Starting with the ADE evidence, a Swedish study,¹⁵ using data from the entire Swedish population over the age of 12, a total of 9,153,456 people, found that two doses were 43% protective against Omicron infection at week 4. By week 14, protection had dropped to zero.

Effectiveness against COVID-related hospitalization remained around 80% until week 25, but dropped to 40% by week 40. While these data are highlighted in the abstract, a more intriguing finding remains buried in the text that few take the time to read. As reported by investigative journalist Alex Berenson:¹⁶

“Based on one statistical analysis [cubic spline method] vaccinated people had a HIGHER risk of death or hospitalization from COVID roughly a year after receiving their second dose. The charts — b and d below — show that vaccine protection against death and hospitalization begins to decline slowly after about five months and then plunges about nine months ...

This data provides real-world evidence of possible vaccine-caused ‘antibody dependent enhancement.’ In ADE, vaccines cause our immune systems to produce antibodies that help a virus or other pathogen to attack us ...

(The top chart shows the relative risk of infection, hospitalization, intensive care, and death by week after two vaccine doses. The red line marks zero effectiveness; when the blue line falls below it, it is suggesting vaccinated people are at higher risk of infection.)”

 

When they used another statistical method called standard polynomial regression, the shots remained moderately effective against hospitalization and death over time, falling to 45% protection against death around nine months, after which the effectiveness mysteriously started trending upward again.

According to Berenson, the lead author of the paper did not endorse either method as superior to the other. When asked for comment, Dr. Yiyi Xu told Berenson they “need more data to know which finding might be correct,” and that, at present, “the estimation is quite uncertain for both analyses.”

COVID Shots Kill Brain and Heart Cells

Another recent paper¹⁷ links the COVID shots to lethal myocarditis (heart inflammation) and encephalitis (brain inflammation). As reported by Steve Kirsch:¹⁸

“The paper is entitled: ‘A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19.’ It was published yesterday, Oct 1, and ... already has over 100,000 views of the abstract and over 6,000 views of the full text.”

The report details the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID shot. His first injection was the AstraZeneca jab, received in May 2021, which was followed by two doses of Pfizer in July and December 2021 respectively.

Autopsy confirmed his Parkinson’s diagnosis, but it also revealed several unexpected conditions contributing to his death, including:

• Aspiration pneumonia
• Systemic arteriosclerosis
• Acute vasculitis (vascular inflammation) in both the brain and the heart
• Multifocal necrotizing encephalitis (meaning tissue death all over the brain)
• Chronic cardiomyopathy (heart disease), and
• Mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis (a rare form of myocarditis that occurs wen lymphocytes, white blood cells, enter and inflame the heart muscle)

Testing for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) revealed the inflammation was in response to spike protein only, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. As noted by the authors:¹⁹

“Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.”

Irrefutable Evidence the COVID Shots Can Kill

Kirsch goes on to cite other evidence showing the COVID shots can kill, including a report²⁰ titled “On COVID Vaccines: Why They Cannot Work, and Irrefutable Evidence of Their Causative Role in the Deaths After Vaccination,” written by Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt.

“Of the 15 bodies their team examined — all of whom had died seven days to six months’ post-jab — 14 (93%) were found to have been killed by the COVID shot.

Bhakdi and Burkhardt claim to have developed a way to test for spike protein in human tissue, and say they’ve found spike protein in the tissues of people who have been injured and/or killed by the jabs.

Of the 15 bodies their team examined for this report — all of whom had died seven days to six months post-jab — 14 (93%) were found to have been killed by the COVID shot.²¹ The video above reviews their findings. All 14 had clear evidence of the body attacking itself, including the heart, with fatal consequences.”