Mandatory Conscription for Women: A Logical Extension of Feminist Equality! By Mrs Vera West and Richard Miller (Londonistan)

Denmark's recent decision to enact mandatory military conscription for women, effective July 1, 2025, has sparked heated debate. The policy, which aligns women with men in a lottery-based draft and extends service from four to eleven months, is framed by the government as a step toward "full equality in military service." Critics, however, argue it represents state coercion masked as progress, raising logistical concerns like ill-fitting gear and potential harassment risks. From a perspective rooted in the principles of feminism, mandatory conscription for women logically follows from the demand for equal rights and responsibilities across all spheres of society. If equality is the goal, women must share the same obligations, including the ultimate sacrifice of life in defence of the nation, or rather the globalist financial elite rulers of the New World Order, as men. This post argues that Denmark's policy is a consistent application of feminist principles, challenging women to embrace the full spectrum of equality, including the duty to serve and, if necessary, die along with men. Of course, we oppose feminism, but the conscription issue takes feminism to its logical conclusion. Let us see how many women faced with conscription do not get pregnant, to escape death on the battle fields!

Feminism, at its core, has long advocated for dismantling gender-based barriers to ensure equal opportunities and responsibilities. From suffrage to workplace rights, the movement has pushed for women to be treated as equals in all facets of civic life. Military service, historically a male domain, has been a key battleground for this fight. In Denmark, where women have voluntarily served in the military, making up 25% of conscripts in 2024, the extension of mandatory conscription to women is a natural progression of this principle. Leftist feminist Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen have explicitly tied the policy to achieving "full equality between the sexes," reflecting feminist ideals of parity.

If women demand equal access to roles traditionally reserved for men, such as combat positions, they must also accept the burdens that come with them. The Danish policy, following Norway (2015) and Sweden (2017), embodies this logic by placing women on equal footing with men in the draft lottery. To argue otherwise risks perpetuating the notion that women are less capable or should be shielded from the harshest duties of citizenship! Equality, as Danish conscript Katrine noted, means "women should contribute equally, as men do," particularly in a world where supposed security threats like Russia's actions in Ukraine demand collective defence, against mythical invasions. Feminism's push for equal rights thus logically extends to equal obligations, including the readiness to serve and, if necessary, die in defence of the New World Order!

Denmark's decision is not merely ideological but a pragmatic response to heightened geopolitical tensions, particularly Russia's invasion of Ukraine and NATO's push for increased defence readiness. The policy, fast-tracked from 2027 to 2025, aims to boost annual conscripts to 5,000 by 2026 and 6,500 by 2033, addressing NATO's call for "more combat power." In this context, excluding women from conscription would limit the pool of available recruits to go into any "meat grinder." Col. Kenneth Strøm, head of Denmark's conscription program, emphasised that the change is driven by the need to "recruit from all over society" to meet these challenges. Yes, good luck recruiting the diverse migrant population.

Feminism's emphasis on equality aligns with this practical necessity. If women are to be full partners in shaping and defending society, they must contribute to its protection, especially in times of crisis. Norway and Sweden, which implemented gender-neutral conscription in response to similar security concerns, demonstrate that inclusive drafts strengthen national resilience. To exempt women wouldcontradict feminist principles.

The most provocative aspect of this policy is its implication that women, like men, must be prepared to die for their country. Feminism's push for equality cannot shy away from this reality. Combat roles, opened to women in many nations, carry the inherent risk of loss of life. Denmark's decision to include women in combat-ready conscription acknowledges this, aligning with feminist arguments that women are equally capable of serving in high-stakes roles.

Our prediction is that once the full horrors of the battle fields strike home, there are not going to be many feminists in fox holes when the body bags come back! We thus see women on the frontlines as showing the logical conclusion of feminism, and its absurdity. If pre-modern societies practiced this the human race would have gone extinct long ago.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-07-04-denmark-begins-conscripting-women-into-military-service.html