Manacles for Mankind By James Reed
The little book Manacles for Mankind (Britons Publishing Company, 1964) by Mark Ewell, is now up on the Alor.org site, as should be read by actionists:
https://alor.org/Storage/Library/PDF/Ewell_M-Manacles_For_Mankind.pdf
This book summarises the argument at the time, now 58 years ago, about the dangers of the communist-based one World government orientation of the United nations. Ewell showed that the entire framework, including its numerous pompous Human Rights declarations, were, and are, fundamentally anti-Christian. The formulation is based upon atheism, with no refence to God, even though most of humanity at the at time, and still today are theists.
Rather than go over and repeat what the book says, we can note some on the ramifications that are predicted in chapter 29 of the book, “The Shape of Things to Come.” Ewell saw the intellectual framework that the UN set up as being used to promote a one-world agenda. Thus, we have seen since 1964 all of these predictions come to pass; indeed 1965 saw the undermining of the white Australia policy, and the similar immigration policy in America. Britain, of course, began taking in non-white Commonwealth migrants directly after the end of World War II, as the UN in its anti-white agenda, wanted. The endgame of this is that all of these countries will have a minority white population within decades, if not a decade. And, along with that, the feminist agenda was pushed, especially abortions. When Roe v Wade, the abortion on demand CASE, was overturned in the United States, the UN responded viciously, saying that this was a denial of human rights.
But that is only the beginning of things, for not anticipated by Ewell, given advances in genetic technology, has been the transhuman agenda, to rework the very biological nature of the human being. We have covered this extensively at the blog, drawing on the writings of Dr Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology and Dr Mercola. The point remains, and conservatives who are science challenged seemingly do not grasp this, that what are called mRNA vaxxes are not traditional vaxxes, but gene therapies, which are making human beings into genetically modified organisms. It is the first step on the stairway to bio-hell.
Ewell has a discussion of the UN’s disaster in the Congo. That, however was merely the beginnings of so-called peacekeeping human rights violations, which have continued over the decades. These often involve sexual abuse of local women and girls, indeed, children, some as young as 11 years.
“Dr. Nile Gardiner, a fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said that the allegations of abuse in the Congo raise “serious questions about U.N. oversight of its peacekeeping operations and the culture of secrecy and lack of accountability that pervade the U.N. system. The fact that abuses of this scale are taking place under U.N. supervision is astonishing, and it is inconceivable that officials in New York were unaware of the magnitude of the problem at an early stage.” Pointing out that the United States is the largest contributor to UN peacekeeping operations and is expected to contribute over $200 million to MONUC in FY2006, Dr. Gardiner argued that the United States should take the lead in holding the United Nations accountable for the scandal. He offered a number of recommendations for Congress to consider, including calling for a UN Security Council investigation into the allegations; pressuring UN member states to prosecute their nationals accused of human rights violations; establishing an external oversight organization, completely independent of the United Nations, to act as a “watchdog” over UN operations; establishing an oversight mechanism to monitor the use of American contributions to UN peacekeeping and humanitarian operations; and withholding a percentage of the U.S. contribution to UN peacekeeping operations unless the UN personnel are brought to justice.
Testifying on behalf of Human Rights Watch, Anneke Van Woudenberg detailed the findings of her organization’s investigation in the Congo: “We interviewed girls, some as young as 13-years old, who had been raped by MONUC soldiers. We also spoke to girls aged between 12 and 15 who engaged in what is commonly called ‘survival sex’ sexual relations they entered into in order to get some food, money or protection. These relations are frequently exploitative and are particularly easy to establish in environments of conflict and massive displacement where women and girls have limited options. Allegations of sexual abuse are not unique to U.N. forces in the DRC. Human Rights Watch and other organizations have documented similar practices in Bosnia, Sierra Leone, Liberia and other countries.” Ms. Woudenberg also noted that over 40,000 women and girls have been raped or abused by other armed groups in the Congo and argued that the U.S. government should work with MONUC to hold the Congolese government accountable for the national army and other armed groups in the country. She also voiced her opposition to Dr. Gardiner’s recommendation of limiting the U.S. contribution to UN peacekeeping operations, stating, “We believe the U.N. needs to take urgent action to deal with those accused of sexual abuses, but it is important that this issue does not overshadow the important role that MONUC must play in helping to bring about peace in the DRC through a process of democratic elections…The U.S. government and others must not allow MONUC to be further weakened and must take action to ensure it is capable of doing the job for which it was created. As with a right to vote in free elections, they deserve a right to live free of human rights abuses and they deserve a right to peace.”
Few of these UN criminals were prosecuted, as the countries are well-suited to such predators, with failed legal systems:
https://www.ibanet.org/article/CEBC5F69-A238-49BB-B85A-5E8D878FE485
In short, as Mark Ewell showed in his 1964 book, nothing has changed; the UN remains a globalist gang, hiding behind the façade of fancy human rights talk, but doing the very opposite.
Mark Ewell concludes with an expression of alarm at the “brave new world” agenda of the UN, and today we add its comrade the World Economic Forum. However, in many respects, what we are seeing, including the idea that most human beings are useless eaters that can be discarded is the final battle for the human essence.
Comments