Malcolm Roberts: Opposing the Voice on Principle By Peter West
A great piece to give to the undecided, as yet on the Voice, to hopefully push them over to the No side has been presented by Malcolm Roberts at the Spectator.com.au. The Voice is about a “vibe,” a feeling that a generation of neo-Marxists have had: “The vibe of the voice feels like inherited race guilt. The vibe is the exploitation of a person’s ancestors for money, privilege, and power.
The vibe is a ‘gap’ between races propped open in perpetuity by pages of the Constitution.” And the real answer is simple:
“Ditch the ‘vibe’ and return to first principles. Is racial division wrong? Then write ‘No’. Is racial privilege wrong? Then write ‘No’. Is elevating one member of our community over another wrong? Then write ‘No’.
For the love of this beautiful country and everyone in it, please write NO.”
No, it’s the only way to go!
“There are periods in history when a nation is tested. Revolutionary activists promise popularity to leaders with floundering polls in exchange for … well, the details of the bargain are rarely made clear. It’s a feeling. It’s a vibe. It’s a careless marketing slogan.
This ideology is better known as the ‘Greater Good’. It always was and always will be a saviour cult. It pops into existence through the cracks of a fragmented society – a weed with pretty flowers and roots that run deep. Those who leave these activist ideas to bloom will soon find themselves in a civilisation with rubble instead of roads.
In our case, Australia has been placed under siege.
On October 14, Australia will be tested.
It is the moment when we are asked if the core values of our nation have changed.
Muddied with misleading phrasing and a deliberate attempt to sell the Voice to Parliament as a mere ‘goodwill gesture’, Australia is actually being asked if it is ready to depart from the democracy of individuals, and head down the path of a democracy between bargaining collective forces.
It is the unionisation of race promoted and spurred on amongst those who openly thank their communist elders for the inspiration.
In obscuring the referendum question, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is making it clear – he doesn’t want you to ask questions. He doesn’t want you to read the detail. He hasn’t read the detail. This is about a ‘vibe’ – although not a very nice one.
The vibe of the voice feels like inherited race guilt. The vibe is the exploitation of a person’s ancestors for money, privilege, and power.
The vibe is a ‘gap’ between races propped open in perpetuity by pages of the Constitution.
There is no doubt that past governments have failed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Since 2018, there have been 19,000 grants given to 300 Indigenous corporations at a grand total of $11.5 billion. These are often lacking in annual reports, audits and accountability.
I’ve travelled with my staff to Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory and across Queensland. I’ve visited every Cape York community and into Torres Strait Island communities. I’ve listened to residents, and one thing that has struck me is how little the Voice to Parliament interests them. A counsellor in the Torres Strait community of Badu summed it up accurately, saying that many in the Aboriginal industry do not want to close the gap; they want to perpetuate the gap to keep milking taxpayer funds.
The Uluru Statement from the Heart contains a draft copy of a blank cheque. If the Prime Minister had read the statement ‘in full’ or had it printed on his ‘Truth-Treaty’ t-shirt, he may have seen the call for annual reparations calculated as a percentage of GDP. Even at 1 per cent, that would reach over $20 billion a year.
Billions have been spent – with billions more to come. Drowning in money, last week the ‘Yes’ rally marched straight past a homeless Aboriginal man begging on the street.
There is no better symbol for this referendum.
Ignore the Prime Minister and ignore his ‘vibe’.
The Voice to Parliament is asking a very simple Yes/No question.
Are we people, or are we collectives?
As people, do we have a voice, or do races have a voice?
Does the Parliament, accountable to the people, write the laws of the land – or are we going to allow an elitist bureaucracy of appointed activists sculpt our laws?
Australians are being asked the question 60 years after Martin Luther King’s ‘I Have A Dream’ speech.
Does Australia have a dream?
Is that dream a nation where teachers separate children into oppressors and victims and the oppressors forced to write letters of apology for the colour of their skin?
Is that dream an Australia dictated to by race bureaucracies with union-style bargaining power, as one architect of the Uluru Statement suggests when leading rallies in front of the CFMEU?
Is that dream a nation where some Australians have a ‘special spiritual connection to land’ and others are – what – guests that have to be constantly welcomed?
Do we live in a country where a racial collective can make a claim over public land and the private homes of hardworking Australians?
Is this the Australian dream?
We speak of the core values of this nation changing.
Has Australia become a nation with treaties between the races of its people, land grabs, race taxes, and a multi-billion dollar grievance industry sheltering communists, Marxists, and those that see nothing wrong with the raised fist of ‘Black power’?
Australians should not raise their fists at each other in expressions of power. You cannot have a revolution with yourself, and shame on every person who mimics the socialist imagery that killed so many people in so many nations.
This is not a reconciled Australia.
Democracy is balanced on the edge of every ballot.
Australia must say ‘No’. They must write ‘No’.
It is shocking that the Prime Minister has attempted to sell this referendum to us under the guise of ‘kindness’ – and that he has disguised political power as ‘recognition’.
But then, the ‘Greater Good’ has been used to sell Australia all manner of dangerous policy.
I am certain people thought they were ‘doing good’ when they voted for Net Zero targets and leaned into the false promises of ‘green’ energy. Those people have their eyes closed, unable to watch as our farmland, rainforest, and beaches are littered with spinning blades the size of skyscrapers – tombstones to the folly of ‘Net Zero’.
Green energy is sending third-world children down the cobalt mines, while outsourcing wind turbine and solar panel production to a country that correctly treats 100 per cent renewable as an ‘unworkable’ idea.
Whose ‘Greater Good’ is this?
The same Prime Minister who wants you to ‘trust him’ on the Voice deleted his election promise to cut your power bills. Now, children stick themselves to roads, begging corporations to bulldoze rainforests in Queensland to make way for wind farms. The ‘vibe’ of Net Zero brought us poverty and a butchered landscape.
Labor’s slogan ‘just go with the vibe’ is why we have a generation of children taught to reject their physical bodies. Under the guise of ‘affirmation’ and ‘kindness’, they have been disfigured, sterilised, and thrown into the arms of the medical industry and Big Pharma for a life of pain and interference.
The ‘vibe’ says it’s just ‘glitter and rainbows’ – no one sees the detail of women with their breasts cut off and young men castrated.
Our children are under constant threat because in 2017, adults voted on a vibe instead of the detail.
The ‘vibe’ of ‘Greater Good’ is what saw the worst abuses of political power we have ever seen in this nation. For three years, politicians and health experts demanded the public ‘just trust them’ in the absence of detail. Well, the detail is slowly emerging – along with the deaths, injuries, mental trauma, and financial ruin. The pandemic ‘vibe’ has crippled this nation.
Ditch the ‘vibe’ and return to first principles. Is racial division wrong? Then write ‘No’. Is racial privilege wrong? Then write ‘No’. Is elevating one member of our community over another wrong? Then write ‘No’.
For the love of this beautiful country and everyone in it, please write NO.
Comments