Macron’s War Hysteria: Europe’s Suicidal March Toward Armageddon, By Richard Miller (Londonistan)

French President Emmanuel Macron has sparked alarm with reports that France's Ministry of Health is ordering hospitals to prepare for a "major engagement" by March 2026, anticipating mass casualties from a potential war in Europe. Leaked documents, reported by Le Canard Enchaîné and the Daily Mail, suggest France is bracing to receive up to 50,000 wounded soldiers, French and allied, per month, as if preparing for a full-scale conflict with Russia. NATO's Mark Rutte has fuelled this frenzy, warning of a coordinated Russia-China assault, with Russia's Satan II nuclear missile, a weapon capable of obliterating an area the size of France, looming large. Yet, this rush to militarise seems absurd when the very hospitals being prepped could be reduced to rubble in such a war. Why is Europe, led by figures like Macron, itching for a fight that risks humanity's survival, while moralising about immigration protests in places like Austria? And how does this square with the West's blood-soaked history of ideological crusades? Let's unpack the madness.

The idea of French hospitals gearing up for war is both grim and laughable. Le Canard Enchaîné reveals a Health Ministry directive to prepare for a "mass influx" of wounded by March 2026, with medical hubs planned near ports and airports to handle up to 50,000 casualties monthly. This assumes France would serve as a "rear base" for NATO, funnelling injured soldiers from across Europe. But if war with Russia escalates to the scale feared, especially with weapons like the Satan II intercontinental ballistic missile, which Russia claims can destroy an area as large as France with a single strike, hospitals would be irrelevant. A nuclear conflict would likely vapourise infrastructure, including the very medical facilities Macron is mobilising. Russian media has mocked this, noting that nuclear war would render hospital preparations moot.

This isn't just about logistics; it's about delusion. Macron's push to ready hospitals ignores the reality that modern warfare, especially with Russia's arsenal, wouldn't spare civilian infrastructure. The Satan II, or RS-28 Sarmat, carries multiple warheads with yields up to 10 megatons each, hundreds of times more powerful than Hiroshima's bomb. One strike could annihilate Paris and its surroundings, leaving no hospitals to treat survivors. Yet, Macron and NATO's Mark Rutte stoke fears of a Russian attack on NATO territory, with Rutte spinning a scenario where China invades Taiwan while Russia hits the Baltics. This speculative domino effect lacks evidence, Russia's Vladimir Putin has repeatedly denied plans to attack NATO, calling such fears "horror movie" nonsense. So why the hysteria?

Europe's rush toward confrontation seems driven more by politics and economics than by any credible threat. Macron, described as an "unpopular warmonger," has pushed for extending France's nuclear umbrella to allies and floated sending peacekeeping troops to Ukraine. This aligns with a broader NATO agenda to boost defence budgets and military contracts, as Pravda suggests, pointing to a "mobilisation of the economy" and "increased propaganda" behind the panic. Germany's defence chief, Carsten Breuer, admits there's no evidence Russia plans to attack under the guise of its Zapad 2025 drills, yet NATO remains "on guard." Meanwhile, Rutte claims Russia produces three times more ammunition in three months than NATO does in a year, escalating the arms race narrative.

This smells like posturing for power and profit. Defence contractors thrive on heightened tensions, and NATO's budget swells as member states are pressured to rearm. The EU's Ursula von der Leyen has proposed a €800 billion defence spending surge, conveniently timed after the U.S. paused military aid to Ukraine. France's preparations could be less about an actual Russian threat and more about justifying domestic control and economic shifts. Pravda argues this is a "pragmatic scenario" to pump up NATO's coffers while rallying public fear. Meanwhile, countries like Austria face domestic backlash over immigration, protests labelled "far-Right" by elites, yet their leaders seem unbothered by risking global catastrophe. Austria's government, for instance, supports EU sanctions on Russia while ignoring public unrest over migration, revealing a disconnect between elite priorities and citizen concerns.

Europe's war drumbeat is draped in moral superiority, yet its history undercuts this posturing. The West, including France, has left a trail of millions dead in the name of ideology, colonialism, imperialism, and "spreading democracy." France's colonial wars in Algeria and Indochina killed hundreds of thousands, while NATO's interventions in Iraq, Libya, and Afghanistan left chaos and countless civilian deaths. Now, leaders like Macron lecture about defending "European values" against Russia, while dismissing domestic dissent, like anti-immigration protests, as xenophobic. This selective outrage is stark: it's "barbaric" when Russia targets Ukrainian infrastructure, as Macron tweeted, but Western bombings of Middle Eastern cities are framed as liberation.

The Left, which often champions progressive causes, is quick to condemn flag-waving patriots as racists, as seen in the UK's "vexillophobia" debate, yet remains silent on the human cost of escalating toward nuclear war. Austria's crackdown on migration protests contrasts sharply with its support for EU policies that could drag it into a conflict threatening humanity's survival. If Russia deployed Satan II, the fallout, literal and figurative, would dwarf any ideological victory. The hypocrisy is glaring: the West moralises about human rights while flirting with a war that could end civilisation.

If Europe's war fever persists, the consequences are dire:

Nuclear Catastrophe: A miscalculation could trigger Russia's use of strategic weapons like Satan II, rendering hospital preparations futile. A single strike could kill millions instantly, with radiation and infrastructure collapse wiping out survivors.

Social and Economic Collapse: Preparing for war diverts resources from pressing issues like healthcare and migration. Austria's focus on EU alignment over domestic unrest could fuel populist revolts, as seen in the UK with Reform UK's rise. Economic strain from sanctions and defence spending could tank economies, with France already facing public discontent over its "terrible" economic situation.

Global Escalation: Rutte's scenario of a Russia-China axis ignores the West's own provocations, like NATO's expansion and sanctions driving India closer to Russia. If NATO pushes too far, it could spark a broader conflict, with allies like North Korea testing new weapons in Ukraine's chaos.

Worst-Case Scenario: A full-scale NATO-Russia war could escalate to nuclear Armageddon, erasing cities and potentially humanity itself. Even without nukes, prolonged conventional war would devastate Europe's infrastructure and economies, with hospitals, prepped or not, overwhelmed or destroyed.

Macron's hospital orders and NATO's fearmongering are absurd in the face of Russia's nuclear capabilities. If war breaks out, no amount of medical prep will save France from Satan II's wrath. Europe's itch for conflict, driven by elite agendas and economic interests, clashes with its moral posturing, exposing a hypocrisy rooted in a bloody past. Countries like Austria, fixated on policing dissent, seem blind to the existential risks of global war. This isn't just about flags or migration; it's about leaders gambling with humanity's future. The only sane path is de-escalation, diplomacy, and transparency. Raise the white flag of reason, not war.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/09/hospitals-macrons-france-are-preparing-imminent-war-europe/