Luciferase? Glows Fluorescent Blue? Injected into Us? Whatever Could it Be? By Mrs Vera West

I found the idea that some chemical called “luciferase,” was found in the Covid vax, to be thought provoking. The root of the word goes back to a reference to light, but it also refers to the Prince of Darkness, not saying that Satan lives in the vaccines of course, but the ultra-paranoid 666 folk just might. “The vaccine glows, at least Pfizer’s does,” Melissa Strickler, who worked for the pharmaceutical giant for nearly 10 years, said. “It looks like someone took a blue glowstick, cracked it open and put it in the vial, but only if there is light and it is around a dark background.” Ms Strickler, in her career, which has now been terminated by her whistle-blowing, had never seen anything like this. What could its purpose be?

But this is not the only questionable aspect of the vaccines, Strickler says. According to an interview with exposure site Project Veritas, Strickler revealed insider Pfizer emails from high-level employees directing lower-level workers to not discuss the role of aborted foetal cells in the development of its Covid shots with the public. One would be forgiven for thinking that they wanted to hide this, rather than proclaim it as a natural part of the abortion system. After all, if the foetus has no right to life, what rights are there associated with a few of its cells? Makes utilitarian sense in the way most things do in this most diabolical of systems.

The usual disclaimer, that the factual claims are made by Melissa Strickler, not by this blog that merely is reporting in the public interest, from prior US published reports.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bombshell-pfizer-whistleblower-says-vaccine-glows-contains-toxic-luciferase-graphene-oxide-compounds/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_medium=push&utm_campaign=2021-10-14-LifeSiteNews

“Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine vials glow fluorescent blue and contain an enzyme called Luciferase, a quality inspector for the drug company told LifeSiteNews in an exclusive interview this week.

“The vaccine glows, at least Pfizer’s does,” Melissa Strickler, who worked for the pharmaceutical giant for nearly 10 years, said. “It looks like someone took a blue glowstick, cracked it open and put it in the vial, but only if there is light and it is around a dark background.”

Strickler, who worked at Pfizer’s large McPherson, Kansas plant, said she has inspected “hundreds of thousands of units” of vaccines in her career at the company “and never once seen anything do that, not even close.” Usually, the fluid in vials are clear like water, she said, but she photographed vials when she noticed the blue fluorescent tinge to the fluid and inquired about the ingredient to superiors.

Luciferase not on the label.

Strickler said she heard a doctor describe codes for ingredients in the vaccines, including the codes SM102 for luciferase, a glow-in-the dark enzyme produced in fireflies, plants and fish that is used in bioluminescence research. Depending on different chemicals that it is mixed with, luciferase will glow different colors.

A bright blue luciferase was identified in a report in the journal Nature Scientific Reports in 2020, for example, and is only visible under UV lights of certain wavelengths.

Strickler told LifeSite that she emailed the company and asked if luciferase was in the Covid vaccine and was told that it was “only used in the testing of the vaccine,” but would not be included in the final product. “But the way I see this is the whole thing is experimental,” Strickler said.

“We haven’t even seen the Comirnaty labels being put on the vials in that plant yet,” Strickler said, referring to the tradename for the vaccine that the Food and Drug Administration approved in August. “As far as I know, everyone is still receiving that Emergency Use Authorization” original product.

Aborted fetal cells in development

In an explosive interview with Project Veritas made public last week, Strickler revealed insider Pfizer emails from high-level employees directing lower- level workers to not discuss the role of aborted fetal cells in the development of its Covid shots with the public. 

Vanessa Gelman, Pfizer senior director of worldwide research, sent an email to an employee asking how to respond to a question about the use of aborted cells in its Covid vaccine.

“From the prospective of corporate affairs we want to avoid having the information on fetal cells floating out there. The risk of communicating this right now outweighs any potential benefit we could see, particularly with general members of the public who could take this information and use it in ways we may not want out there,” the email stated.

Other emails from Pfizer vice president and chief scientific officer Philip Dormitzer discussed the role of human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293 cells) harvested from an aborted baby girl in 1973 and reproduced in a continuous line of cells used in the production of Pfizer’s Covid shot.

Strickler said the cells were chosen because of their ability to grow and are basically “cancerous cells” from an aborted baby.

‘What else?’

“It made me sick to my stomach because, if they’re going to lie about something like this, what else?” Strickler remarked. “It’s actually one of the things that if the public knew, they definitely would care.”

Thousands of people have sought exemptions from workplace Covid vaccine mandates on grounds of religious or conscience exemptions citing the use of fetal cells in the development of Covid vaccines and have been denied their requests. Social media platforms have routinely deleted posts about fetal tissue in Covid vaccine development and mainstream media have “fact-checked” reports as “misinformation.” Strickler said that Pfizer knows this.

‘They’re just deceitful’

“They’re just simply being deceitful. I mean, they could end the conspiracy theories, they could correct the fact-checkers on social media and they remain silent because they know if they do say, ‘yeah, we did use fetal cell lines in the development of this,’ they know that they’re not able to deny the religious exemptions. I think that’s what it’s about.

“It’s wrong in my opinion to benefit from an abortion. I don’t think God would want us doing those things. But it goes deeper than that as to public deceit and they’re trying to give it to children.”

Gene editing

“I thought all this stuff was conspiracy things,” Strickler told LifeSite reporter Jim Hale. She described the deceit from Pfizer as “endless,” however. “I don’t think they’ve been honest about a single thing about this vaccine other than it’s experimental. And that it’s mRNA technology.”

She added that the mRNA technology of the vaccines could be used with CRISPR technology for gene editing and that fact is also being obscured to the public in messages from Pfizer, the mainstream media and government. 

Pfizer employees ready to quit

Strickler said that before Covid she had enjoyed her job as a product inspector but that since the pandemic began many employees have “vaccine regret” after getting the shots and “a lot of people refused to get it. In fact, over half of the employees are willing to walk out over this and Pfizer knows that.”

Strickler compared the drug giant with an “abusive, rich husband.” She said the company offers excellent benefits and pay, “but they don’t exactly treat you the best in the sense that they don’t seem to value all their employees equally.”

She described frequent “virtue signaling” emails sent to employees, including one proclaiming Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla “Father of the Year.”

Strickler said she had often wanted to quit after Covid vaccine manufacturing began at the McPherson plant and had prayed about it, but felt compelled to hang on, until she discovered a database of explosive and deceitful company emails that she eventually exposed to Project Veritas.

After the exposé aired, Strickler received a phone call from an employee at Pfizer telling her not to come to work again and a letter from the company confirmed that she was fired.”

Along with the above, this is also relevant, another shocking exposure by Project Veritas:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/undercover-video-catches-pfizer-scientist-saying-covid-shot-doesnt-work-sometimes/?utm_source=featured&utm_campaign=usa

“Project Veritas’ latest undercover video reveals a Pfizer scientist recounting one instance of a superior expressing disinterest in the apparent failure of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine to impart immunity to a test subject.

The video, released Friday, shows a snippet of a conversation with Pfizer scientist Nick Karl, who tells an undercover Veritas journalist of his “first experiment” with the vaccine on a subject who “got the vax twice and had no antibody response.” At first, he thought the sample had simply been mislabeled, but his unnamed superior’s reaction was allegedly indifference.

“Like I was, like, questioning it, and my boss was like, ‘who cares, like it just didn’t work,’” Karl says. “I’m like, ‘what?’”

“He didn’t want me to investigate it further,” Karl continued. “He was like, ‘I really don’t care about this one sample that didn’t work.’ I guess there’s a small percentage where it just doesn’t work.”

The video is the latest in a series of exposes Project Veritas has published on the COVID vaccines generally and Pfizer specifically. It comes as a growing body of data indicates that mass vaccination is failing to curb the spread of the virus. The federal government considers more than 65% of eligible Americans “fully vaccinated” (a designation that has lost meaning in light of growing evidence that vaccine effectiveness wears off in a matter of months), yet ABC News reported last week that more Americans died of COVID-19 this year (353,000) than in all of 2020 (352,000), according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

Last month, The Blaze senior editor Daniel Horowitz noted that the Pfizer vaccine enjoyed the most favorable treatment from the federal government of all the COVID vaccines, including quasi-FDA approval and permission to administer third shots, despite data finding it to be less effective than the Moderna shot.

Across the nation, significant concerns remain about the safety of all three COVID-19 vaccines (from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson) used in the United States, which stem from the fact that they were developed and released far faster than any previous vaccine.

Vaccine defenders note that the one-year development period was not starting from scratch, but rather relied on years of prior research into mRNA technology; and that one of the innovations of the Trump administration’s “Operation Warp Speed” was conducting various aspects of the development process concurrently rather than sequentially, eliminating delays unrelated to safety. However, those factors do not fully account for the condensing of clinical trial phases — each of which can take anywhere from 1-3 years on their own — to just three months apiece. 

While cases of severe harm reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) after taking COVID shots represent less than one percent of total doses administered in the United States, a 2010 report submitted to the US Department of Health & Human Services’ (HHS) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) warned that VAERS caught “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events.” May reporting from NBC News quotes several mainstream experts acknowledging “gaps” in federal vaccine monitoring.”

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 06 May 2024

Captcha Image