Letter to The Editor - Society Under Attack
This is interesting and shows you should never give up on your letter writing.
The following was sent to the Shepparton News on the 14th August 2017 and published today (13th September 2017) on the eve of the ‘postal ballot’.
To hear our Representatives trying to justify support for this issue whilst other important issues hurting their constituents are of little moment for them as they bicker and squabble among themselves worse than little children.
It is ‘adversarial politics’ at its worst as they try and confuse voters in their grab for Power. It is a very good reason to place the ‘sitting Member’ last next time you are required to vote.
In the meantime, voting negative in the plebiscite might keep the nasty wolf at bay a little longer.
Now it is up to you!
Society under attack
• 13 Sep 2017
• Shepparton News
• from Louis Cook Numurkah
So we are going to have a vote on marriage equality. What the hell is marriage equality?
Come on, we are being asked to give our blessing to a homosexual lifestyle.
When I was a child, homosexuality was regarded as deviant sexual activity and my parents disapproved because it was unnatural.
It definitely is unnatural because a man and woman together have creative potential which is absent from the homosexual and lesbian lifestyle.
This is also a sad state of affairs because in the first instance they cannot know the joys of natural parenthood, and later the joys of their own grandchildren. This is what gives meaning to life.
In truth, Australians should not be voting on this issue because it is a moral issue and what people do behind closed doors is their business.
Meanwhile, we have people sleeping on streets and soup kitchens . . . in resource-rich Australia.
I am sure the ABS massage their statistics to hide the real situation in the workplace while the bank ‘fat-cats’ and other bureaucrats live very well.
George Orwell’s Animal Farm is given new life.
Let’s go back to the marriage equality plebiscite . . . the push for homosexual recognition goes back many years and my first exposure was reading a book picked up at a meeting, The Homosexual Revolution; a challenging expose of the social and political directions of a minority group, printed in 1962.
Later came a news sheet distributed in schools ‘Gay, Young, and Proud’.
Many parents were upset that this publication was being passed to their children and presented as ‘an alternative lifestyle’. The ending is so different after passing years, indeed the opposite to the name of the publication.
I have actually seen it in action and it really is sad.
They have no children and must rely on the charity of strangers. The school children were invited to make up their own mind on the publication — it was a disgrace.
Then followed ‘Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep’, taught to children at kinder . . . it may sound innocuous enough with children and naive parents but it was the thin edge of the wedge of acceptance.
Now the rainbow is their logo. Do you see it now?
This is part of a campaign planned over many years and designed to break down the traditional family of man and woman with children.
Our society is under attack and this is directed through the traditional family to undermine the state.
Core values are questioned and then undermined and discarded to be replaced with alien philosophies or beliefs divorced from reality — this is how the communist state is built.
Response from Wallace Klinck, Canada
Thanks for this, Lou—an excellent letter. Odd that they delayed publishing it until just before the plebiscite. Friend or foe? Your are right—this “campaign” is one of the worst and most disgusting examples of how unscrupulous and power-hungry politicians will jump upon any issue to compete for popular electoral support—without any regard for the welfare of society. The whole thing is designed by its real instigators to rend society and engender general confusion by the deceitful use of language to manufacture bogus “rights” which can be used as an issue steadily to increase State control over society by legalistic and administrative means. But, so long as everyone must have a “job” in accord with the Puritanical decree, and will starve without one, everyone must be free from the threat of “discrimination”. Never mind the normal trend to eliminate “jobs” by technological means. Everyone must have an automatic obligation to work but not an automatic right to consumption.