Leading New Zealand Medical Scientist Sees the Dangers of the WHO Pandemic Treaty By Brian Simpson
Dr Ray Avery, known as 'Sir Ray,' having been given an actual Kiwi knighthood, a Knight Grand Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit then by governor-general Sir Anand Satyanand, for his contributions to medical technology, has expressed grave concerns about the World Health Organization's (WHO) globalist agenda, not only during the Covid plandemic, but at present with the International Health Regulations and pandemic treaty. As he details at his Linkedin.com post below, the WHO cannot be trusted with the extraordinary power that the coming agreements will bring. Already WHO is using fear mongering to beat countries into signing, which shows the ruthless quest for power of this organisation.
The WHO is expecting that the agreements be signed in May 2024, and the main Australian political parties are onboard with this. One should write to one's local member, or better, go see them, to lobby for opposition to Australia signing up. As well, there is advice for Australia in this:
"If the New Zealand Government signs up for this alliance then there may be a case for putting together a class action legal case on behalf of the people of NZ for signing away our sovereign rights and our freedom of speech."
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ray-avery_can-we-trust-the-who-activity-7164911187451740160-I7HA/
"CAN WE TRUST THE WHO WITH SO MUCH POWER?
Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely…", said Lord Acton in 1857.
This widely-quoted aphorism should lead us to reflect on the absolute powers that the World Health Organization is currently seeking for its director-general (DG).
The organization has abandoned the broad, interdisciplinary vision of health based on primary care and public engagement that characterized its original mission.
What we now see is a top-down, command-and-control approach, based on a narrow scientific base and the preferences of a few major donors.
The WHO has palpably and repeatedly failed to deliver in times of crisis.
The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) are being rushed towards a deadline of May 2024, for adoption at the World Health Assembly.
This is exceptional speed for such documents and creates significant obstacles to civil society participation in the process.
The changes to regulations only require a simple majority and become effective more or less immediately.
It is these changes that represent a significant shift of power from nation-states to the person of the director-general (DG) without any provision for a transparent appointment process or for that person to be accountable to any representative body or international legal tribunal.
This is a recipe for autocracy.
The IHR amendments have the effect of changing recommendations to directions or commands. The DG can declare a Pandemic in response to a potential, rather than an actual, threat and regardless of the views of the state from which the threat is thought to arise.
The DG, acquires the power to close borders, require vaccine passports, mandate vaccinations, impose quarantines and censor media critical of these interventions. The DG is to be the sole source of pandemic truth.
While overriding the traditional jurisprudence of human rights, these also trespass on the sovereignty of nation-states to make their own judgments about what is best for their citizens.
In the COVID pandemic, for example, Sweden could have been directed to comply with WHO instructions rather than following the different views taken by its own public health experts.
Governments should not be signing up to the IHR amendments without a proper debate in civil society, informed by the social, political and socio-legal sciences of regulation and governance.
Absolute power should not be given away in the moment of panic provoked by the pandemics of fear and action.
This is an easy-to-read summary of an article written by Robert Dingwall emeritus professor of sociology at Nottingham Trent University UK .
If the New Zealand Government signs up for this alliance then there may be a case for putting together a class action legal case on behalf of the people of NZ for signing away our sovereign rights and our freedom of speech.
Comments