Latest Evidence for the Covid Lab Construct Hypothesis By Brian Simpson
I have been reporting on the evidence for SARS-CoV-2, the Covid-19 virus, being lab created. This is an important issue because even though the role of US intelligence and communist Chinese research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is now a cold case, thanks to institutions like the World Health Organization, and Western research scientists, shilling for communist China, and sweeping things under the carpet, there is the future problem of plandemics to come, that Bill Gates has gloated about. For the more science-minded, here is a summary of new research which looks at the molecular biology of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and concludes that it synthetic, that is, man-made. What is important here is the fact, that if they can cause the chaos that they did once, the globalist elites will do it again, and have gloated about it, drunk on their supposed power.
“Was SARS-CoV-2 the result of a laboratory experiment, such as Gain-of-Function, gone awry? Did it perhaps, escape out of a laboratory due to lax quality practices at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? Late last year, a trio of scientists, one a mathematical biologist, the other a molecular immunologist, as well as a cancer biologist, issued study results based on a series of laboratory and computational analyses that SARS-CoV-2 contains a strange pattern exhibiting unique restriction endonuclease recognition sites supporting what the scientists suspect represents a human made pathogen, explaining that the pathogen was represented by “efficient dis-and re-assembly of the viral genome characteristic of synthetic viruses.” What is the likelihood of such a pattern surfacing in the novel coronavirus without bioengineering? The authors argued, “We find that SARS-CoV-2 is an anomaly, more likely a product of synthetic genome assembly than natural evolution.” The basis of their argument: 1) The restriction map of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with many previously reported synthetic coronavirus genomes 2) meets all the criteria required for an efficient reverse genetic system and 3) differs from closest relatives by a significantly higher rate of synonymous mutations in these synthetic-looking recognition sites and 4) has a synthetic fingerprint not likely to have evolved from close relatives. Thus, the study authors declared, “We report that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro.”
That topic emerges in the mainstream press again, at least in India. One of India’s top business dailies, the Business Standard, and other mainstream outlets report on the recent study uploaded to the preprint server bioRxiv authored by mathematical biologist, Alex Washburne from Montana, as well as associate professor of pharmacology at Duke University Antonius VanDongen, and a molecular immunologist named Valentin Bruttel. This study result, although not even peer-reviewed, generated a lot of backlash, even leading to an entry in The Economist. The trio suggest that the virus has “some genomic features” that “would appear if the virus had been stitched together by some form of genetic engineering.”
https://www.biorxiv.org/search/%2522%252BAlex%252BWashburne%252B%2522
Comments