Keep Out: Europe’s No-Go Zones, By Richard Miller (London)
One of the clearest refutations of multiculturalism, the idea that migrants will keep those parts of their culture that enrich liberal society, mainly the chattering wining and dining class, is the existence of no-go zones.
Dr Robert Malone has given a surprisingly detailed account of these in Europe. To date the authorities deny the existence of these enclaves where police fear to go, unless in armoured vehicles. But the evidence is undeniable that such zones exist. It shows that it was a total lie, that when such immigration was kicking in, to show how anti-racist society was, the claim was made that the migrants would be inserted into mainstream society, and enrichment by diverse cultural practices would occur.
As detailed below, this "enrichment" of a sort has occurred, since before mass replacement migration, Sweden, for example, was short of grenade attacks, and now it has them, a plenty! And let us not forget, Sweden is now the rape capital of Europe, which is presumably also a cultural enrichment, "enrichment" meaning an "addition."
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/no-go-zones
"No-go zones, as the term is most commonly used today, are areas within cities where it is unsafe to enter if one is not Muslim. Within these areas, the authorities have lost control. Police, emergency services, and other non-residents are either barred from entering or consider it unsafe and won't enter. In Europe and UK, such areas are spreading rapidly due to massive immigration campaigns.
The term "no go zone" has often been associated with people accused of spreading "right-wing" conspiracies. This is because government officials and their mainstream media apologists usually deny the existence of such areas. This denialism began in earnest over a decade ago, and then as the narrative scaffolding was set since then, mainstream media has taken this as de-facto truth. But the reality is completely different.
A decade ago, such zones were hotly denied by officials. In fact, the city of Paris threatened to sue Fox News in 2015 for reporting on the existence of such areas within the city limits. State-Sponsored media sources, such as The Guardian - to this day- write that the use of the term "no go zone" is just another way the "right" stoke anti-immigration "fears" and anti-Muslim hate. Because of such push-back, the term "no go zones" became a hot-button term used only by the brave and the stupid almost a decade ago. But what was touted as another "right-wing" conspiracy theory that promoted populism,* racism, and anti-immigration hate - has come to be a real phenomenon throughout Europe.
Despite the rhetoric by both city officials and the liberal press, there is plenty of evidence that such zones exist and that they are growing in number.
Below is the typical fact-checker response to the query of asking for a definition of a "No Go Zone". Of note, almost all of these factcheck and news articles debunking no-go zones are at least five years old, but rise to the top and first page of GoogleNet search engines:
Yet another example where "factcheckers" are revealed to be merely propagandists.
The Independent.co.uk writes that:
The "no-go zones" theory, which is spread by global far-right pundits online has been widely debunked and where there have been isolated incidents of "Muslim patrols", suspects have been arrested and condemned by local Muslim leaders.
Ergo, if you happen to believe that no-go zones exist, you, too, must be a racist.
There is nothing to see here, folks; move on.
But the Paris riots of 2023, which Parisian officials blamed on "pension reform" has shown a spotlight on the issues of open immigration and no go zones.
The truth is that open border policies within many European nations have created a nightmare, particularly in countries close to North Africa, where a small boat can easily move back and forth between countries. In some nations, such as France, the immigration surge has been going on for decades, and many immigrants have been warehoused into urban ghettos. Furthermore, the European Union's compulsory migrant resettlement policies, which include quotas, continue to encourage further immigration to Europe.
The truth is that "no go zones" - just like all ghettos or slums, are places where poverty, over-crowding, and resentment foam up to encompass all that live there. Many of these areas are basically permanent migrant camps. Within these ghettos, residents have implemented Sharia Law, which acts as a government entity within the boundaries of these ghettos. Installing Sharia law as a semi-autonomous or even autonomous government within these ghettos, where crime, poverty, and lawlessness are rampant, can be viewed as a very sensible approach for those who have to live their lives in these conditions. But it is also a very dangerous trend.
The real problems are massive migration waves, open borders, the warehousing of people, poverty, and the lack of opportunities for immigrants. Too many immigrants arrive too fast to be assimilated into a new culture or alternatively Islamic immigrants that do not view assimilation as an acceptable solution are threatening local traditions and way of life. And yes, that powder keg is being controlled by a makeshift Islamic system of rule that is archaic and radicalized. However, woke agendas do now allow even the questioning of such issues. Being patriotic is now linked with nationalism, which is linked to Nazism. In Germany, expressions of national pride, such as flying of the German flag, are perceived as far-right. All of which makes no sense, except in the minds of progressives.
When did being an advocate for the nation and culture you were born into become a bad thing?
The open border policies of many European nations - encouraged by the UN and the EU- have made the situation almost impossible. Immigrants are being ware-housed in migrant camps and slums, where xenophobia, poverty, hard living conditions, crime, Sharia law and resentment boil over.
Where young adults can't find either work or educational opportunities they instead find each other. Roving gangs are a significant issue. They blame their "captors" for their living conditions, not the fact that, at some point, they or their families boarded a boat and entered the country illegally. No-go zones are full of young people who now believe their new country "owes" them a living wage, medical care, food, and education.
The truth is that these no-go zones are dangerous places. Many of these migrants are used to Sharia law as a governance system. Unsurprisingly, they return to what they know for solutions in such living conditions. Having ghettos that are being ruled not by a nation-state but by a traditional religious sect is a recipe for disaster. How long before true civil war will break out in these regions?
Why can't European nations find solutions? Why can they not admit that there are areas where it is dangerous to enter if one is not of Islamic faith? If a city or nation were to designate such areas formally as a no-go zone, they would, in essence, have to admit to the failure of the state. So, while denouncing those who speak of the dangers of no-go zones as "right-wing", the truth is that those who live near or in these zones are very much aware that they exist. The quote below is from Wiki…
In 2010, Raphaël Stainville of French newspaper Le Figaro called certain neighborhoods of the southern city Perpignan "veritable lawless zones", saying they had become too dangerous to travel in at night. He added that the same was true in parts of Béziers and Nîmes.[6] In 2012, Gilles Demailly, the mayor of the French city Amiens, in the wake of several riots, called the northern part of his city a lawless zone, where one could no longer order a pizza or call for a doctor. The head of a local association said institutional violence had contributed to the tensions resulting in the no-go zone.[7][verify] In 2014, Fabrice Balanche, a scholar of the Middle East, labelled the northern city of Roubaix, as well as parts of Marseille, "mini-Islamic states", saying that the authority of the state is completely absent there.[8]
In 2005 France's domestic intelligence network, the Renseignements Generaux, identified 150 "no-go zones" around the country where police would not enter without reinforcements. Christopher Dickey, writing in Newsweek, said the situation had arisen due to racism towards immigrants.[9]
For a jaw-dropping article about the terrible situation regarding no-go zones in France, consider reading this interview.
But it isn't just France. In Sweden, the police define specific areas as "vulnerable areas". Wiki explains that in Sweden:
The existence of and the rise of no-go zones in Sweden is not something that the Swedish government wishes the public to know about. In an excellent article in the European Conservative magazine, the author and his colleague explored one of the most notorious no go zones in Sweden.
In short, during our visit to Malmö, my colleague and I confirmed much of what we had previously envisioned. Rosengård is a parallel society, seemingly cut off from the rest of Sweden. It is most certainly an uncomfortable place by day and an unsafe one by night. I would not want any of my female family members or friends to go there, for any reason…
It is that very truth that so many Swedes persistently deny, and it is that denial that has created a Sweden so regretfully damaged and unrecognizable to its preceding generations. May Europe notice and respond accordingly, when and where it is not too late.
Likewise, a deep dive into the London scene reveals that there are areas that are no-go zones. However, the UK government is loath to admit their existence.
But the thing is that the situation in London gets even more horrific, Jewish people have been specifically targeted by Islamic fundamentalists. Areas of London are now considered unsafe for Jews.
London has become a "no-go zone for Jews" during weekend pro-Palestinian marches, the government's counter-extremism commissioner has said.
"A spokesperson for the Campaign Against Antisemitism told BBC News its own recent polling "corroborates Mr Simcox's warning, finding that 90% of British Jews say that they would avoid travelling to a city centre if a major anti-Israel demonstration was taking place there".
Jonathan Wittenberg, senior rabbi of Masorti Judaism UK, said that he felt the demonstrations were "partly" pro-Palestinian but had "very minute, more radical elements at heart", which are "very intimidating for Jews".
He told BBC Radio 4's PM programme: "When they are taking place, and in the aftermath, it is very frightening and disturbing for... the Jewish citizens of London and that is not at all as it should be.
"On the other hand, that doesn't make the whole of London, all the time, a no-go zone for Jews."
In London, mainstream media outlets, such as the DailyMail now speak openly of no-go zones for Jews. These are areas within London that are unsafe for Jewish people even to enter."
Comments