Jabbed and Abandoned: Shattering the Mainstream's "Nothing to See Here" Veil on COVID Vaccine Carnage, By Chris Knight (Florida)

Ladies and gentlemen of the reality-based anti-vax community, strap in because the house of cards that Big Pharma and their media lapdogs built is wobbling, and a fresh Rasmussen poll just delivered the gust that could topple it. We're talking 10% of vaccinated U.S. adults reporting major side effects from the COVID-19 shots, with another 36% hit by "minor" ones that probably felt anything but minor. That's millions of Americans, our neighbors, our kids' soccer coaches, the barista who hands you your morning coffee, left reeling from heart palpitations, crippling fatigue, or worse, while the suits in white coats and the talking heads on CNN chant the mantra: "Nothing to see here, folks. Benefits outweigh the risks. Move along."

This isn't hyperbole; it's the cold, hard echo of silence. A survey of 1,292 adults, conducted November 10-12 with a razor-sharp margin of error, screams that 46% of both jabbed and unjabbed Americans suspect these experimental mRNA cocktails have fuelled a wave of unexplained deaths. Yet where's the primetime special on NBC? The soul-searching op-ed in The New York Times? Crickets. Zilch. This isn't oversight; it's orchestrated amnesia, a deliberate gaslighting of a nation betrayed by the very institutions sworn to protect it. As an unyielding seeker of truth in a sea of spin, I've watched this playbook unfold, from the rushed Emergency Use Authorizations to the censored whistleblowers, and it's time to call it what it is: a scandal that dwarfs Watergate and makes Tuskegee look like a rounding error.

The mainstream's dismissal isn't just passive; it's predatory. They peddle polls from friendly outfits like KFF showing "majority trust in vaccines," conveniently burying the partisan fractures where Republicans eye the data with well-earned scepticism. But Rasmussen? Oh, they're the bogeyman, branded as "GOP-leaning" or worse, "anti-vax propagandists" in pre-emptive strikes from outlets like the LA Times. Never mind the methodology's rigour or the raw voices it amplifies. When the narrative threatens the holy grail of "safe and effective," the response is deflection: Label the messenger, ignore the message, and hope the herd forgets. Spoiler: We won't.

Picture this: A national snapshot drops, revealing that nearly half of Americans now link the vaccines to a shadow pandemic of sudden deaths, heart inflammation, and mystery cancers. Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, who's treated the fallout firsthand, warns of a "disturbing rise" in these tragedies, systematically scrubbed from the headlines. Yet mainstream gatekeepers? They're MIA. No fact-checkers swarming like locusts, no viral threads debunking the "myths." Instead, they recycle 2021 chest-thumping about rollout triumphs, as if the long tail of turbo cancers and multisystem inflammatory syndromes never materialised.

This isn't journalism; it's protectionism. The Independent Medical Alliance, rebranded from frontline warriors, logs a "marked rise" in these horrors among mRNA recipients, with President Dr. Joseph Varon decrying the "poorly understood" long-term meddling of synthetic spike proteins in human biology. The FDA's June 25 whisper-update to Pfizer and Moderna labels, admitting myocarditis risks, especially in young males after dose two, slipped in like a guilty footnote, after 1,200+ cases torched the "rare" excuse. But benefits outweigh risks? Tell that to the 16-to-24-year-olds clutching their chests, or the families burying "healthy" loved ones. The poll isn't "anecdotal"; it's arithmetic. And ignoring it? That's malpractice on a societal scale.

Enter Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), the lone ranger in a senate of sheep, who dared host a May hearing for the vaccine-wounded. Victims poured out tales of dismissed pain, ridiculed recoveries, and institutional stonewalling, echoed by whistleblowers exposing buried data. Johnson's reward? Backlash from pharma-funded foes and media smears branding him a "conspiracy enabler." It's the same script that vilified Andrew Bridgen across the pond, the British MP demanding an mRNA moratorium amid fertility craters and inflammatory syndromes that scream "not coincidence."

These aren't rogues; they're remnants of accountability in a captured system. Dr. Pierre Kory's frontline reports of miscarriage spikes? Censored. Josh Sigurdson's spotlights on post-jab cancer surges? Shadowbanned. The mainstream's "nothing to see" isn't denial; it's defence of a trillion-dollar liability shield, where Pfizer's windfall trumps patient peril.

Let's ditch the platitudes and hit the hard data. The CDC's own Advisory Committee tallied those 1,200 heart cases in youth, yet clings to the "outweigh" line like a life raft in a tsunami. Studies now tie mRNA to everything from blood clots to "unusual cancers," with the Independent Medical Alliance flagging the 2021-2022 mandates as "reckless" experiments on the unwilling. And fertility? Physicians like Kory document rates that would shutter any ethical trial, while global echoes, from UK's inflammatory spikes to U.S. "sudden death" clusters, pile up like indictments.

The mainstream counters with cherry-picked meta-analyses from captured journals, dismissing harms as "coincidental" or "underreported positives." But when 46% of Americans smell the rot, per Rasmussen, that's not hesitancy, it's awakening. Their silence on this poll? It's the dog that didn't bark, proof the narrative's fraying at the edges.

Zoom out, and the "nothing to see" farce unravels worldwide. Bridgen's halt call in Parliament mirrors victims like Kristi Dobbs stateside, whose advocacy network has lost souls to suicide and shot-induced cancers after years of medical mockery. "We will be seen, heard, and believed," she vows, a battle cry for the black-sheeped like Johnson.

Mainstream echo chambers amplify "trust the science" PSAs, but skip the autopsies, the IMA logs, the polls piercing the veil. It's a feedback loop of fear, where questioning invites the "anti-vax" scarlet letter.

To drive it home, consider this stark breakdown from the Rasmussen data: Side effects aren't outliers, they're the norm for millions.

The Rasmussen revelation isn't dismissible, it's dynamite. The mainstream's "nothing to see" is a smokescreen for negligence, a bid to bury the bodies under "safe and effective" rubble. But with allies like Johnson, Kory, and Bridgen cracking the facade, and polls like this lighting the fuse, the reckoning looms.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-11-26-1-in-10-adults-injured-by-covid-vaccine.html