Is the Climate Ideology Slowly Dying? By Richard Miller (London)

Covering the European scene for the Alor.org blog, I keep track of what fellow dissent critics are saying, some of whom I have got to know as internet comrades. The German blogger Eugyppius, gives insightful posts about the madness of the woke German situation, relevant to the rest of the West. Thus, he notes that the woke champions of equality have moved on a bit from saying that climate change is the greatest concern in the world, and from this he concludes that climate change alarmism is in a state of terminal decay. The leading lights such as Greta Thunberg, are taking the line that there can be no climate change solution without social justice, first. And the World Economic Forum are now concentrating on misinformation as the greatest existential threat to human civilisation.

It is true that the globalist elites and New Class "thinkers" have changed their focus to meet the times. Thunberg is taking the expected Left line on the conflict in the Middle East, which as always, over-simplifies a much more complex reality. And the World Economic Forum have not retreated from climate change alarmism, but have moved to deal with what they see is a challenge to their program by grass roots resistance, such as the farmers fighting back.

Climate change tyranny is still real, and must be fought, and resistance must not be diminished by false hope generated by the superficial observation that the attention of the elites has shifted for the time. Climate change alarmism as an ideology is not in a state of terminal decay, and remains a real threat to our freedom and the existence of Western civilisation.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/why-climate-ideology-is-slowly-dying

"The ambassadors of equality and humanitarianism have never been so eager to tell us about all the things in the world that are more important than climate change. I take this as further evidence that climatism, as an ideological system, is in a state of terminal decay.

The child prophet Greta Thunberg has been chanting since the outbreak of war in Gaza that "there is no climate justice on occupied land." As slogans go, this one is ambiguous, but it appears to mean that the human rights of Palestinians must take precedence over reducing carbon emissions. This would square with what Thunberg told the press last year:

As a climate justice movement, we have to listen to the voices of those who are being oppressed and those who are fighting for freedom and for justice. Otherwise, there can be no climate justice without international solidarity.

As I posted a few days ago, a group of "experts" and "risk analysts" surveyed by the World Economic Forum have proclaimed that "misinformation and disinformation" pose a greater near-term threat than climate change. Press reports on their assessment paint a surprising picture of demoralised elites who believe they are facing disaster and have no idea what to do about it:

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has a bleak outlook: of almost 1,500 experts and risk analysts from business, politics and society surveyed on behalf of the WEF, a good third believe that a global catastrophe is likely in the next two years.

Two thirds expect it to happen within ten years – whatever the horror scenario may look like, the risks are manifold: climate change, conflicts, shifts in the global balance of power, social division, social inequality, artificial intelligence. The world's ability to adapt is reaching its limits, according to a key statement in the World Risk Report.

"The report cites misinformation and disinformation as the biggest risk for the next two years, followed by extreme weather events, social polarisation and armed conflict," says Saadia Zahidi, Managing Director of the World Economic Forum, adding that AI-generated fake news and cyberattacks are the immediate top risk worldwide – especially in view of the upcoming elections in several major countries such as the USA, the UK and India.

Yes, "climate change" is still there, but note the pot pourri of ill-defined nonsense with which it must now compete. Suddenly "social inequality" and "artificial intelligence" are just as terrifying as the gaseous byproducts of overmuch industrial production hastening the heat death of the earth's ecosystems."