White Nationalism to the Rescue By Chris Knight
The New York Times is getting heartburn about White nationalism and the Alt Right – that is, people like us:
Face it, if you are White and make a squeak about race, immigration, and especially banking and the rule by the global financial elites, then you are a bad guy, according to the cosmopolitanists and globalists:
“When rapid immigration and terrorist attacks occur simultaneously — and the terrorists belong to the same ethnic or religious group as the new immigrants — the combination of fear and xenophobia can be dangerous and destructive. In much of Europe, fear of jihadists (who pose a genuine security threat) and animosity toward refugees (who generally do not) have been conflated in a way that allows far-right populists to seize on Islamic State attacks as a pretext to shut the doors to desperate refugees, many of whom are themselves fleeing the Islamic State, and to engage in blatant discrimination against Muslim fellow citizens.
But this isn’t happening only in European countries. In recent years, anti-immigration rhetoric and nativist policies have become the new normal in liberal democracies from Europe to the United States. Legitimate debates about immigration policy and preventing extremism have been eclipsed by an obsessive focus on Muslims that paints them as an immutable civilizational enemy that is fundamentally incompatible with Western democratic values.
Yet despite the breathless warnings of impending Islamic conquest sounded by alarmist writers and pandering politicians, the risk of Islamization of the West has been greatly exaggerated. Islamists are not on the verge of seizing power in any advanced Western democracy or even winning significant political influence at the polls.”
The fact is, there are thousands of articles and news reports, most in the mainstream press, and some at sites like Breitbart, that directly contradict this. To cite some, how about statistics from Europe on migrant crime, especially rape, and the creation of no-go zones?
“Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen has warned that his country may be seeing a rise of Muslim “parallel societies” and no-go zones and has promised to take steps against them.
The Danish prime minister said that the problem has become so prevalent in Denmark that he is considering state intervention in some areas. The move is unusual for Denmark which rarely ever sees the government interfere in the operation of schools or set specific rules for housing estates, Jyllands-Posten reports".
The move is doubly unusual for Europe, where the normal approach of establishment politicians is to deny the existence of no-go zones altogether. The comments by Løkke Rasmussen seem to suggest a radical break from his fellow Western European leaders in that regard.
“It’s a matter of being realistic about the situation,” Rasmussen said, “and there are areas where there is already a different set of rules. Where the gangs are in control and the police cannot work. I cannot sit and passively let it happen.”
“We have tried everything possible, but we just could not solve the problem,” Rasmussen said and called on the Danish parliament to “engage us in a different and more robust way”.
What about the confession that migrant criminals have taken over an entire regions of Europe, made by police authorities?
“Police in Norway say that they have completely lost control over the city of Oslo due to the fact that radical Islamists have taken over the area.
According to police, Grønland, a district in the city of Oslo, is experiencing “apocalyptic levels of violence and lawlessness.”
"The Grønland district of Oslo looks like Karachi, Basra, and Mogadishu all rolled into one. People sell drugs openly next to the Grønland subway station, violence is epidemic, and the police have largely given up. It’s not Norway or Europe anymore, except when there is welfare money to be collected.
The police are powerless. Five years ago, Aftenposten, a pro-Islamic leaning publication that is the largest newspaper in the Oslo, stated that there are sharia patrols in this area, and gay couples are assaulted and chased away. “Immigrant Fatima Tetouani says that ‘Grønland is more Muslim than Morocco.’”
Thousands of examples like this can be cited. The New York Times does not seriously attempt to deal with this material, but just rattles of politically correct libtard garbage:
“Far-right leaders are correct that immigration creates problems; what they miss is that they are the primary problem. The greatest threat to liberal democracies does not come from immigrants and refugees but from the backlash against them by those on the inside who are exploiting fear of outsiders to chip away at the values and institutions that make our societies liberal.”
As for migrants preserving liberal institutions, one need only consider the case of Sweden where migrants are now permitted child brides. Sweden has legalised child marriages for Muslim immigrants, who have children wives. This is due to the huge influx of migrants, and many girls, as young as 14, are pregnant:
Sharia law is also slowly becoming part of the legal system, even in Australia:
Cutting to the chase, both liberal elites of the chattering class, and Muslims want sharia law to be added to Australian law, with respect, to firstly family law, then business dealings. Contrary to The New York Times, migration can, and is, fundamentally changing liberal culture; according to Charles Gave, French financier, it will only take 30 to 40 years for the Muslim population of Europe to become the majority, “le Grand Remplacement,” and this will inevitably result in sharia law:
It is an attempt by the elites to replace us, but an attempt not thought through in very much depth, because, they too, will be replaced.
Profits today; oblivion tomorrow: