US President Kamala Harris: Burying the West By Charles Taylor

     It is such a transparent plan, but will the great mass of sheeple who are “normies” wake up to it, or do they really want a socialist US president, South American style? Kamala Harris is the one US “black” Senator, who is not African American, whose ancestors had slaves, and who spend most of her career as prosecutor, locking up African American men, with long accusations of injustice. She stands by her man, senile Joe Biden, whom she previously denounced as a sexual harasser, and she will be president since Biden has said that he is just a transitional candidate, who will pass the presidency to this Machiavellian, soon. The next few articles cover all that, important, but not the most important things for Australians. More important is her communist credentials:
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/does-anyone-else-find-ironic
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/cnn-joe-biden-could-step-aside-kamala-harris
  https://www.amren.com/news/2020/08/joe-biden-selects-kamala-harris-as-his-running-mate/
  https://www.amren.com/blog/2020/08/joe-biden-kamala-harris-race-regionalism-american-politics/
  https://www.amren.com/commentary/2020/08/what-would-a-president-harris-mean-for-whites/

“Kamala Harris’s campaign sputtered out after Representative Tulsi Gabbard exposed the former prosecutor’s own record: There are too many examples to cite but she put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana. She blocked evidence — she blocked evidence that would have freed an innocent man from death row until the courts forced her to do so. She kept people in prison beyond their sentences to use them as cheap labor for the state of California. And she fought to keep cash bail system in place that impacts poor people in the worst kind of way. Sen. Harris does want to eliminate the “racial wealth gap.” Her plan would give money to “families living in historically red-lined communities.” This may not be a straight handout to blacks because it would be based on geography, and racial housing patterns no longer fit those old maps. In an October 2019 report, the Brookings Institute found that plans built around “redlining maps” “will prove to be insufficient in dismantling the legacy of racial inequalities in homeownership and wealth in the United States.” Senator Harris’s most worrying policies would be for “combating violent hate.” Her plan (now archived) called “anti-immigrant manifestos” a sign of “impending violence” that could justify removing suspects’ Second Amendment rights “if they exhibit clear evidence of dangerousness.” Who defines “dangerousness?” Candidate Harris said she would “immediately direct the National Counterterrorism Center to address the threat of global white-nationalist terrorism, and seek authority to include domestic terrorism in its mission.” She would also “reverse President Trump’s dangerous efforts to deprioritize countering white supremacy and commit $2 billion to investigate, disrupt, and prosecute domestic terrorists.” This includes making it a “priority” for the FBI to “more vigilantly monitor white nationalist websites and forums – consistent with well-established legal requirements and civil liberties protections – where extremists discuss and encourage violent acts.”

The next sentence reads, “This will put pressure on online platforms to take down content that violates their terms and conditions.” She therefore wants the federal government to pressure platforms to remove legally permissible speech, not just violent content. She would also tell the FBI to “identify and penetrate extremist networks and seek Domestic Terrorism Prevention Orders to preempt terrorist attacks.” Her plan is silent on antifa and black identity extremists. She has only whites in her crosshairs. And if the federal government splashes out billions to combat “hate-based violence,” the bureaucracy will invent a threat to justify its existence. We already see this in the “non-profit” sector, where phony hate crimes justify constant fundraising. As I write this, Joe Biden is invoking the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville as a specter of white terror. The violence that day was the city’s fault. However, even if we accept the worst possible interpretation and blame “white nationalists” for everything, Charlottesville was a picnic compared to the riots, property destruction, and deaths that have gripped the country since George Floyd’s death. President Trump’s timid efforts to grapple with this violence, which Democrats openly opposed, are far less intrusive than Kamala Harris’s plans. Would President Harris do what she says? Her record suggests she would. As a district attorney in 2005, she rejected suggestions from her staff that defendants be informed of police misconduct. She changed policy only after a political scandal. In 2013, she refused to defend the state’s ban on same-sex marriage because she disagreed with it, even though it was her job, as California attorney general, to defend state law. In other cases, she pursued her duty to a fault, fighting against compensation for men wrongfully convicted. In one case, she did her best to keep a man in prison even after a judge tossed the conviction on the basis of police misconduct, incompetent defense, and a lack of evidence. The man was allegedly tied to a Nazi gang, but the case was so outrageous that even Jacobin blasted Kamala Harris for it. Sen. Harris is not particularly extreme by today’s standards, but her life is about acquiring power. Once she has it, she would surely wield it against us. She is likely to restrict freedom of speech and other constitutional rights. Even those who have criticized her in the past would cheer it on.”

     She would be against the Clinton-described white “deplorables,” because she is a deplorable communist, the one China wants, after China-Biden:
  https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/08/12/govtrack-kamala-harris-further-left-than-democratic-socialist-bernie-sanders/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=daily&utm_campaign=20200812
  https://vdare.com/articles/ann-coulter-on-kamala-harris-how-do-i-tell-my-friend-she-s-not-african-american
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-08-11-joe-biden-picks-kamala-harris-running-mate.html
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/11/kamala-harris-the-tech-sectors-dream-of-political-control/

“The non-partisan GovTrack.us website rated Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) the most left-wing member of the Senate in 2019 — further left than “democratic socialist” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). In 2018, Harris was ranked the fourth-most left-wing. But by 2019 — a year she spent running for president — Harris had moved to the furthest extreme. She was an early co-sponsor of the Senate version of the “Green New Deal” of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), as well as the “Medicare for All” bill introduced by Sanders, which would have eliminated all private health insurance. Harris also supported granting free health care to illegal aliens, slashing military budgets, and other radical proposals. GovTrack explained its ratings: “Our unique ideology analysis assigns a score to Members of Congress according to their legislative behavior by how similar the pattern of bills and resolutions they cosponsor are to other Members of Congress. The score can be interpreted as a conservative—liberal scale, although of course it only takes into account a small aspect of reality.” The most conservative score is 1.00; the most liberal score possible is 0.00. Harris ranked #100 — the “least conservative,” or most liberal, Senator on the list, and the only one to score a “0.00”:

#90 0.16 Sen. Chris Van Hollen [D-MD]
#91 0.15 Sen. Richard Durbin [D-IL]
#92 0.14 Sen. Amy Klobuchar [D-MN]
#93 0.12 Sen. Richard Blumenthal [D-CT]
#94 0.10 Sen. Edward “Ed” Markey [D-MA]
#95 0.09 Sen. Mazie Hirono [D-HI]
#96 0.07 Sen. Cory Booker [D-NJ]
#97 0.07 Sen. Jeff Merkley [D-OR]
#98 0.03 Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D-NY]
#99 0.02 Sen. Bernard “Bernie” Sanders [I-VT]
#100 0.00 Sen. Kamala Harris [D-CA].”

     Biden has already said that Harris will “lead this nation stating January 2021,” letting the communist cat out of the bag.
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DByY7gQLOdw

     Really it comes down to whether deracination has reduced IQ levels such that basic survival instinct has gone. If she is elected, the US falls into civil war, quicker than under Trump. People should consider the most powerful argument against Biden/Harris instead:

•    “They have no special plan, direction, or ideation. They are just a continuation of the Obama years.
•    They are both divided completely. They want law and order and stuff, but also want to pander to the anti-majoritarian audience of neurotics, homosexuals, boxwine, soy, and minorities, and that group wants no standards, values, laws, or anything. They are not nihilists — they believe that those things exist — but they want no enforcement of those on themselves because they view themselves as victims and therefore Karen special snowflakes.
•    They support the schizophrenic heroin addicts and criminal minorities who have been burning down our cities for the past few months. They do not care that the George Floyd narrative was a lie and he died of a heart attack after eating his stash. They would not enforce the law on these people.
•    Their approach is obsolete. They come from the 1960s, when they could trade on the prosperity of WASP America and give away citizenship and benefits. Now, we are out of money for benefits, most of America is third world and not WASP, and Americans are giving up their citizenships at record levels.

She may be younger than Joe, but Kamala Harris has the same problem he does: she is a dinosaur from the easy years of the Leftist takeover, not someone of any relevance now.”

  http://www.amerika.org/politics/conservatives-need-to-stfu-about-kamala-harris/