Trump Dumps WHO, an Early Minute to Him By Charles Taylor

     Credit where credit is due; Trump is following through, which he rarely does, after making tough talk to pull out of supporting the China’s dominated World Health Organization:

“After having warned the organization less than two weeks prior that he would cut funding unless they took steps to show independence from China, President Donald Trump announced Friday that the U.S. will formally end its relationship with the World Health Organization (WHO). “The world is now suffering as a result of the malfeasance of the Chinese government,” said Trump in a speech in the Rose Garden. “Countless lives have been taken, and profound economic hardship has been inflicted all around the globe.” During his 10-minute address, Trump stated that after failing to report the outbreak of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) to the WHO, Chinese officials had pressured the organization “to mislead the world when the virus was first discovered by Chinese authorities.”

Trump points out WHO’s bias towards China
The president had previously outlined a number of questionable steps taken by the organization in relation to the pandemic in a letter to WHO head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus on May 18. Early on, the WHO had criticized the U.S.’s early banning of travel from China. In addition, it had also echoed Beijing’s claim that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. “The world needs answers from China on the virus,” Trump said Friday. “We must have transparency.” Alongside the U.S.’s withdrawal from the WHO, Trump also announced several actions aimed at China. He said that he would issue an order that would prohibit the entry of certain Chinese nationals and that he would also sign a proclamation that would defend research done by American universities. In addition, Trump also directed officials to take a closer look at the practices of Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges with the goal of protecting American investors. According to a WHO spokeswoman in Geneva, the organization would not have a response until Saturday. In April, WHO head Tedros responded to Trump’s accusations that the organization was “China-centric.” “It is wrong to be any ‘country-centric.’ I am sure we are not China-centric,” Tedros said. “The truth is, if we are going to be blamed, it is right to blame us for being U.S.-centric.” Despite these claims, however, some of the organization’s actions, especially in relation to Taiwan, do seem to demonstrate deference to Beijing. Can the U.S. actually leave the WHO? Despite Trump’s announcement, it remains unclear whether or not he can simply withdraw the U.S. from the WHO without the approval of Congress. “The president can’t unilaterally withdraw us,” said Lawrence O. Gostin, director of Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute. “It’s a nonstarter. This is literally a whim of one man, without any consultation with Congress, in the middle of the greatest health emergency of our lifetime,” he added. The Constitution’s Treaty Clause gives the president the right to withdraw the country from any treaties he wants to. However, America’s entry into the WHO came via a joint resolution, not a treaty. Adding to this is the fact that both the joint resolution that facilitated America’s entry and the WHO charter itself does not have any exit provisions. For the most part, countries are trying to join the organization, not leave it, with one such example being Taiwan, who’s involvement the Trump administration had argued for. However, the joint resolution did state that any such exit would require that the U.S. provide a one-year notice and that any financial obligations that it had to the WHO be satisfied prior to withdrawal. On top of its voluntary contributions, the U.S. still owes the WHO close to $60 million for the current year, on top of an outstanding balance from previous years.”

     There just has to be something sinister with any organisation which does not have an exit avenue. Anyway, Trump needs to cut off the money, and other nations need to starve these tyrannical globalist entities such the UN, to death, so that they wither on the vine, and eventually rot and crumble to dust.



No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Wednesday, 14 April 2021
If you'd like to register, please fill in the username, password and name fields.

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to