By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://blog.alor.org/
The Post-White World of the Left By Chris Knight
Recently a revealing Tweet was made by the Democrat Senator Kamala Harris about Trump’s no doubt illusory claim to remove, maybe three illegals from Americas, while he of course is allowing the greatest invasion in US history to happen at the border. The Senator Tweeted in a sweet birdie voice:
“Let's call this what it is: an attempt to remake the demographics of our country by cracking down on immigrants. That this threat is coming from the President of the United States is deeply reprehensible and an affront to our values. We will fight this.”
The logical implication of the claim that deporting illegals is an attempt to remake the demographics of the country, is that the existing open borders philosophy of the Left and globalists is also an attempt to remake the existing demographics of the country! You can’t logically have it both ways. Hence, this is but one more proof of the demographic replacement thesis:
Have those who champion open borders and the idea that states do not have the right to control immigration, really thought this through though, for the population movements will not stop with the reduction of Whites to minorities, as they hope, putting Leftist parties eternally in power, but will lead to the entire Third World, and all of its conditions, simply moving to the West. Will the elites chattering away in universities be happy when even their offices are filled with migrants? After all, open borders means that we become like India, where sadly about 28 percent of the population is homeless. Only, taking in the entire world, as open borders requires, will make it even more intense. Homeless people sleeping outside their offices, and as with the homeless crisis in LA, people will be emptying their bowels not just outside, but inside their offices, and why not? Open borders will mean homelessness for the majority of the people. Here is what is happening in LA in that respect, and at the border:
How about migrants with Ebola, just to further enrich things?
“It’s a huge, dangerous lie. City officials in San Antonio, Texas, are claiming that no migrants from the Ebola-infected Republic of Congo could possibly be carrying Ebola into the United States because “Ebola has a 21-day incubation period,” they say. And the migrants have been walking for more than 21 days. Therefore, they cannot possibly have Ebola. The “officials” saying this are either grossly incompetent or deliberately lying. (By the way, it also begs the question of how migrants from Africa “walked” to the U.S. / Mexico border. Can they walk on water?) For starters, Ebola’s incubation period only averages 21 days. It can be 40+ days in some people, and that’s according to the World Health Organization. As previously reported by Natural News:
• 95% of Ebola incubations occur from 1 – 21 days
• 3% of Ebola incubations occur from 1 – 42 days
• 2% of Ebola incubations are not explained
Furthermore, migrants from the Republic of Congo could have been infected by other carriers who perished before reaching the U.S. border. Infected migrants could enter the USA on, for example, day 10 of their own incubation period. Or day 30. By the time they begin to explode with symptoms, they will have already been transported by bus to any one of dozens of U.S. cities that are currently receiving these migrants.
Surely medical personnel aren’t so stupid that they don’t understand the basics of infectious disease, symptomless carriers and incubation times. Surely doctors must know that magically declaring “zero risk” among people who come from a region of the world that’s known for producing symptomless carriers of Ebola isn’t a valid conclusion. Yet they draw these conclusions nonetheless, putting all of America at risk in order to appease the open borders pushers who seem to want America to be overrun with illegals.”
Every Leftoid pinko socialist liberal globalist fanatic must, to be morally virtuous, take in scores of Ebola infected folk into their home, or else be condemned as racist. After all, isn’t fearing so-called diseases just another form of genetic speciesm, or racism? Isn’t disease discrimination wrong as well? These consequences of open borders are inconvenient truths for the chattering class, well paid from the public purse to dig the grave of Western civilisation.