The Great Same-Sex Plebiscite ruse by Mrs. Vera West

We know that the high court of Australia, has ruled that the definition of “marriage” in the Constitution is such that it embraces same-sex unions. This was done through using a “living” method of constitutional interpretation, saying that words should not be defined as the Founders used them, but as, well, modern progressives use them. This is a handy dandy way of making the Constitution mean anything that progressives want.

Perhaps you hope that the same sex marriage agenda may be defeated in the plebiscite, and will then go away? Think again!

As pointed out in The Weekend Australian, August 13-14, 2016, p. 22, politicians from both the for and against camps have declared that they will not be bound by the result of the plebiscite and intend to vote with their conscience. Gasp! Vote with their conscience!

The elites say that surveys indicate that the majority of people support same-sex marriages. A plebiscite will put that to the test, and having a “NO” case prepared may be instructive for some.

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Sunday, 25 October 2020
If you'd like to register, please fill in the username, password and name fields.

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://blog.alor.org/