Tales from Swedish Dentists By Paul Walker
Remember the rhetoric from Obama et al. about all those poor refugees fleeing to Europe with their latest phones and money, were actually children, not young men of military-service age who could fight for their homeland? Well, a Swedish dentist, Bernt Herlitz revealed that from his observations of molar teeth of migrant patients, 80 percent of the so-called migrant “children” were actually adults. This revelation led to Helitz being fired and he may lose his house. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/swedish-dentist-reveals-80-migrant-children-actually-adults-fired-now-may-lose-home/
This act of war against a native Swede occurred even though it is now openly admitted that the so-called migrant children are adults: http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/681228/child-migrants-age-test-sweden-department-migration-refugee
Their purpose is population replacement of Nordics.
As the white Northern European males of the world are so deracinated and cucked, this agenda is being effortlessly slid into place
Here are some interesting results from a Cato Institute survey on free speech:
“An overwhelming majority of Americans believe that “it would be hard to ban hate speech because people can’t agree what speech is hateful,” including 78 percent of Democrats, 77 percent of Latinos, and 59 percent of African Americans. And the notion that “freedom of speech ensures the truth will ultimately win out” was shared by 70 percent of Latinos, 68 percent of African Americans, and 63 percent of Democrats.
Yet a majority of Americans and a supermajority of African Americans believe that “society can prohibit hate speech and still protect free speech.” (To complicate matters, a quarter of Americans, 38 percent of African Americans, and 45 percent of Latinos erroneously believe it is already illegal to make a racist statement in public.)
Who should get protection against hate speech? Forty-six percent would support a law making it illegal to say offensive things about African Americans; there is less support for banning insults against other groups (41 percent for Jews, 40 percent for immigrants and military-service members, 39 percent for Hispanics, 37 percent for Muslims, 36 percent for gays, lesbians, and transgender people, 35 percent for Christians)”
Remember here, that “hate speech” is basically anything criticising the power elites and their agenda. Do you think that social credit gets a free ride in this new world? Think again. The chattering class have on file all the passages from Major Douglas indicating that social credit is anti-Semitic, even though it is not, and no amount of squirming is going to change that: https://www.amazon.com/Social-Discredit-Anti-Semitism-Response-McGill-Queens/dp/0773520104