SCOTUS: The Shape of Rotten Things to Come By Charles Taylor
We know that the mainstream media is corrupt, for just one example consider how during the election the MSM buried the story of Joe Biden aiding of his son Hunter in his Chinese adventures, a clear compromise of his office. Yet, nothing. Then we have the US Supreme Court, which did not grant standing to the State of Texas to hear the electoral fraud case. Now, the same court throws out all the electoral fraud cases without hearing any. How is that justice? Only one judge stood against this tyranny.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/22/clarence-thomas-dissent-election-cases/
“Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us,” Justice Clarence Thomas declared Monday, when the Supreme Court decided — by one vote –to hear none of the 2020 election cases raising issues of voter fraud and illegal votes.
Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted with the liberal justices to deny review of the lower court decisions.
Four justices must vote to hear a case to put it on the Court’s docket, but only three justices — Thomas, fellow conservative Samuel Alito, and libertarian Neil Gorsuch — voted to take at least two of four of the key cases from November 2020.
All three dissenting justices took the unusual step of writing opinions as to why the Court should have taken at minimum two of these cases.
“The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the ‘Manner’ of federal elections,” began Thomas. “Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emergency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example.”
“The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days,” Thomas explained, referring to one of the rejected cases. “These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”
“For more than a century, this Court has recognized that the Constitution operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power to regulate federal elections,” he continued, quoting Supreme Court precedent. “Because the Federal Constitution, not state constitutions, gives state legislatures authority to regulate federal elections, petitioners presented a strong argument that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision violated the Constitution by overriding the clearly expressed intent of the legislature.”
“But elections enable self-governance only when they include processes that give citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election,” Thomas added, quoting a recent Supreme Court case that held, “Confidence in the integrity of our electoral processes is essential to the functioning of our participatory democracy.”
https://gellerreport.com/2021/02/supreme-court-wont-hear-pennsylvania-election-lawsuits.html/
Apart from Justice Thomas, the rest of the bunch are just Democrats, including dopey Trump’s appointments, who went with the liberals. Clearly the court is finished, and the breakup of America is the only hope. Let the court sink into the swamp.
Comments