Russian Nuclear Targets By James Reed

     So, at long last the Russian nuclear targets have been revealed for America, and there are no real surprises in this years’ nuclear Oscars:
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-nuclear-russia/after-putins-warning-russian-tv-lists-nuclear-targets-in-u-s-idUSKCN1QE1DM

“Russian state television has listed U.S. military facilities that Moscow would target in the event of a nuclear strike, and said that a hypersonic missile Russia is developing would be able to hit them in less than five minutes.
The targets included the Pentagon and the presidential retreat in Camp David, Maryland. The report, unusual even by the sometimes-bellicose standards of Russian state TV, was broadcast on Sunday evening, days after President Vladimir Putin said Moscow was militarily ready for a “Cuban Missile”-style crisis if the United States wanted one.”

     I am sure all of the evangelical Christians and neo-con men hanging out for a last day’s scenario, where almost everyone gets roasted and toasted, but they get send at full speed to Heaven, will love this, with Bible-thumping joy. But, the thing that has not been covered in the media are the Russian targets for Australia. My sources in Moscow have told me that only one nuclear bomb will be dropped on Australia because “you cucks are not worth anymore.” And, guess where the ground zero of this will be? You got it, my flat! Vlad the lad is paying me back by giving me the honour of being assured nuclear vaporisation, because the Russians see my writing as whinging and want to put me out of my misery. For that I am truly grateful, putting me like that crazy old guy from the greatest Western ever made, John “Racist” Wayne’s The Searchers (1956):
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_j3NrcDiS4

     It is worth seeing the movie again, simply in honour of John Wayne, who is presently under the spot light by the degenerate liberals.
  https://mjolnirmagazine.blogspot.com/2017/09/film-review-searchers-john-fords-look.html

     Clayton: Well, the prodigal brother. When d'you get back? I ain't seen you since the surrender. Come to think of it, I didn't see you at the surrender. Ethan: Don't believe in surrenders. No, I still got my sabre, Reverend. Didn't turn it in to no ploughshare either.
  https://www.alor.org/blog/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=1288&Itemid=195

     Aaah … the good old days!
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-02-nuclear-exchange-between-pakistan-and-india-would-lead-to-a-global-food-collapse.html

“The problem lies mostly with Pakistan, however. The Indian military is, by far, stronger: More troops, thousands more tanks, fighter planes, and artillery pieces, and a larger navy including one aircraft carrier. But Pakistan, a nation of 200 million, is well-armed in terms of nuclear warheads; Islamabad is believed to possess around 150 nuclear warheads and the government has the will to use them against India, which no doubt would retaliate with their own arsenal, believed to be around the same number. While the nuclear exchange would be regional, the devastation would be global, according to experts. The couple of hundred weapons India and Pakistan possess would be more than enough to create a nuclear winter from the fallout, which would be enough to kill a sizable portion of the earth’s population, if not all of us.

The spread of radiation-laden smoke and debris following a massive exchange of nuclear bombs between the two regional powers would quickly rise to great heights above the earth and then spread to the entire globe within two weeks, blotting out the sun and decreasing surface temperatures — not for months, but for years. The results would be massive crop failures and soil damage. In fact, according to experts, between 10 and 40 percent of all rice, wheat, and corn crops would fail due to lack of sun and cold temperatures. Currently, there is only enough global food supply to feed the world for roughly two months — 60 days — without being replenished by new crops. After an Indo-Pak war involving a large-scale nuclear exchange, estimates are that between 1 – 2 billion people would perish because of starvation. As The National Sentinel reported, a prior study by the Rand Corp. found that about 2 million people would die right away from a nuclear exchange between the two countries; in the ensuing weeks, 100 million more would perish, most due to radiation sickness. The two countries’ water supplies and soil would be tainted for generations.”

     I am pretty sure that this is going to happen this time. Maybe we will still get a Russian nuke strike as the icing on the nuclear winter cake?

Baby You Can Drive My Tesla! By Bruce Bennett
The Hypocrisy of Gun Controllers By John Steele
 

Comments (0)

There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest. Sign up or login to your account.
0 Characters
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location