Princess Yoko By Peter West

     Beatles fans, of which I am not, tend not to like Yoko Ono, whom they blame for breaking up the fab four, as if they would not have broken up soon anyway, given their inflated egos. Anyway, Meghan Merkle has been compared to Yoko Ono. That I think is unfair to the screaming Japanese conceptual artist, who merely took Lennon where he was going anyway, while Markle, an actress who did numerous sex scenes in her film, endangers an entire institution, which could have national, if not international significance, for the survival of the monarchy.
  https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/01/09/royal-family-deeply-disappointed-and-hurt-by-harry-and-meghans-announcement-report/
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/09/farage-prince-harry-let-side-down-compares-meghan-wallis-simpson/

“Playing the Yoko role is former Suits actress Meghan Markle — aka Princess Pushy; aka the Duchess of Sussex. Playing the Lennon role is former bad boy heartthrob Afghanistan vet helicopter pilot turned bleeding heart, henpecked pantywaist Prince Harry. Playing the rest of the Beatles are the Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince William, Kate and all the other royals quite understandably concerned that if this nonsense carries on for much longer it could be the end of everything. Obviously, in this particular tiff, the majority of British people are very much Team Beatles rather than Team John ‘n’ Yoko. This is partly because most of us support our Royal Family, a bastion of traditional values and a unifying force in times of national celebration and crisis. Mainly, though, it’s because we can’t stand Princess Pushy. As I may have hinted in my last piece on the subject – Princess Pushy Go Home! – Meghan Markle is a dangerously and unnecessarily divisive figure. We don’t mind that she is an actress: the Royal Family has accommodated plenty of those in its time from Charles II’s mistress Nell Gwynne onwards. And we’re certainly not bothered that she is ‘black’. No one even noticed Meghan was of mixed-race heritage until she and her supporters kept banging on about it, as though she were the first ‘person of colour’ the extremely cosmopolitan and well-travelled Royal Family had ever met. Rather, it’s that ever since attaching herself to Prince Harry she has tried to push the Royal Family and, by example, the whole country in a direction that the vast majority of us find utterly repellant. Meghan’s ideological role model is Woke Hollywood: the kind of hypocritical, spoilt, identity-politics-obsessed, whiny, needy, thin-skinned, crass, cry-bullying, virtue-signalling cesspit that Ricky Gervais so deservedly mocked at the Golden Globes. She could have kept her woke politics to herself – that would have been the sensible thing, especially in the early days of her marriage, so as to allow the British people to get used to her. This is the usual quid pro quo when you marry into the Royal firm: in return for your newly elevated social status and your freebies (like Meghan’s multi-million-pound grace and favour cottage on the Queen’s estate in Windsor) you accept that you have certain duties, one of which is not to come across like an entitled gold digger.”

     This spoilt princess, almost literally, endangers the survival of the monarchy, as there is now a renewed push to make the UK into a republic; any excuse will do for the UK republicans. The Royal family should have seen this one coming.
  www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-leadership-monarchy-prince-harry-meghan-markle-clive-lewis-referendum-a9278096.html

Why does Queen Hillary Walk Free? By Charles Taylo...
Epstein Jail Footage, Lost in the Post, or Space B...
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Wednesday, 01 April 2020
If you'd like to register, please fill in the username, password and name fields.