Menstrual Equity???? By Mrs Vera West
In various articles sitting on my worn-out laptop, waiting to be done, I will be covering the theatre of the absurd in the gender agenda. The claims are jaw dropping, so I will just give you the material, but beware that having one’s jaw drop to the floor, poses a tripping hazard:
“The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is calling for men's restrooms to include tampons in order to prevent discrimination against "every person who menstruates." "While free menstrual products are not uniformly provided in women’s restrooms, they are almost never available in men’s restrooms, even for pay," the group said in a statement Tuesday. "Men’s restrooms are also less likely to have a place to dispose of these products conveniently, privately, and hygienically." The left-leaning legal group argued that it wasn't a "full or accurate portrayal" to say that women are the only ones who "menstruate, get pregnant, or breast feed [sic]." "Menstrual stigma and period poverty can hit trans and non-binary people particularly hard," the post read. The group linked to a legislative toolkit in which it advocated for regulation of menstrual products in public restrooms. The group also favors menstrual products in public shelters and schools. "Menstrual equity is a basic equity issue," the report read. "Just as we have regulated the provision of toilet paper and paper towels in public restrooms, so too should we do the same for menstrual products." This wasn't the first time the ACLU made a head-turning comment about gender. On "International Men's Day," the group declared that men could both get their periods and give birth.”
Not to be outdone, Julian Castro has proposed that transgender men have a right to abortion funds. Well, why not? Shouldn’t everyone have a right to abortion funds?
Then we have that person who was the subject of the male genital waxing case, now having a go at gynaecologists. Well, why not? The more the merrier:
“A transgender activist who sued a group of female beauticians because they would not wax her male genitalia is now complaining about a gynaecologist who refuses to take her on as a patient. Canadian Jessica Yaniv revealed her latest legal battle on Twitter on Tuesday (local time). "A gynaecologist office that I got referred to literally told me today that 'we don't serve transgender patients'," Yaniv wrote. "Are they allowed to do that, legally?" Yaniv said she was "shocked and confused" by the refusal. After approaching the British Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, Yaniv says she was told the refusal was "discrimination" and she will be filing a complaint. Yaniv did not say what treatment she needed. But she did say that "gynaecologists ... engage with transgender and non-binary patients, either as part of the transition stage performing surgery or managing pre- or post-transition gynaecological problems". Just a few months ago, Yaniv told a human rights tribunal she had "male parts".
The activist's social media flurry sparked a series of incredulous reactions. Twitter users were baffled as to why Yaniv was seeking out such a service in the first place.”
No, wrong thinking, even having all male parts can still make on a “woman” if that is how one identifies. Equally, one can identify with a fish, a rock, or even a river, if one chooses because everything is a social construction, according to the new regime. It is all going to end, swimmingly. Who still thinks that the idea of a cultural war is just a conspiratorial notion?