Feminism, MeTooism and Porn By Mrs Vera West

     The MeToo movement has been involved in exposing men who rape women, or otherwise abuse them, which on the surface seems a good and worthy thing to do. But, with feminists, part of the globalist movement, there are no good deeds, only political strategies. While taking down scum in Hollywood was good, it did not take very long for this to morph into full-on cultural terrorism against men. Witness the present hate campaign against singer/song writer Ryan Adams, whose only “fault’ is having had some bad relationships and marriage. Even though he has been greatly pro-women, and pro-feminism in his songs, at least those that I listened to in the extensive research done for this article, he is still crucified. Example:
  https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/arts/music/ryan-adams-women-sex.html

     Just imagine if there was a counter-moment, pro-men, where they sought out to expose all women using their sexuality to achieve success. Where do you think this wold go? I got so carried away that I forgot that my punchline related to porn, not corn. But, simply, if Hollywood bad men can be exposed for sexual exploitation, what about dealing with an entire industry based upon the brutal degradation of women? Now, as we are a Christian conservative group, we are prudish in a nice kind of way, so it is best not to mention what goes down in such movies. But, if there is any doubt, on YouTube, female porn stars freely discuss their industry and it leaves no doubt in my mind that not only is it anti-women, but is concentrated Satanic. Why is it that feminists are doing nothing about it? A few radical feminists did cry out about it in the 1970s, but they were shouted down. Is there too much money involved here, and doesn’t porno help in the white genocide programme?

     Don’t even get me started on all of those violent action movies and now video games, where a real case for “toxic masculinity” could be made, but where feminists fear to tread because of the big money involved.
  https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/02/16/on-liam-neeson-and-the-philosophy-of-the-white-vigilante/

“Jonathan Bowden once memorably argued that right wing ideas can be exiled from the political and social mainstream but never totally destroyed, being merely abstracted and displaced into other areas of culture. One such area, he argued, was film, and in certain filmic representations we can still see the semi-self-conscious acting out of the often violent, often suppressed tendencies and latent potentialities of Western man. Bowden cited as examples the number of movie posters depicting a lone White male, gun in hand, gazing into the distance. The movies these posters advertise invariably call upon the themes of a now much-maligned White masculinity. They feature males with singular and non-dialectical mentalities, possessing moral worldviews unclouded by compromise. In a blurring of stark individualism and concern for the group as a whole, these characters often live (and behave) at the margins of the society they go on to protect. They possess an open disdain for social permissiveness, bureaucracy, and procedure, and, finally, they are the spartan, right wing existentialist practitioners of a violent urban vigilantism. They are part of a genre described by one Marxist critic as “repugnantly fascist.”

     Gasp!