“Fake News”: From Russian Hacking to Pizzagate by Chris Knight
“Fake news” and the alleged hacking of the Democrats by the Russians during the US elections, were the buzz international stories over the Christmas break. “Fake news” arose as an establishment response to news it did not like, especially items critical of the elites and migrants. Thus, the German government wanted new laws to prosecute social media outlets such as Facebook for publishing so-called “fake news” and “hate messages’ – defined as criticism of the said groups: http://www.breitbart.com/news/german-legislators-want-to-fine-facebook-for-fake-news.
In responding to this, Facebook will now label “fake news,” using liberal “fact checkers” such as Snopes, Factcheck.org and PolitiFact. But these “fact checkers,” according to Breitbart.com, “have records of left-wing partisanship,” as revealed in the 2016 US presidential election. Thus, it was claimed by PolitiFact that it was “mostly false” (whatever that means), when Donald Trump claimed in a presidential debate that Hillary Clinton wanted “open borders.” This was said even though Hillary Clinton was on record as saying at a speech to bankers: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.”
In another example, Trump said that Clinton had “acid washed” her emails, alluding to her use of the data deletion tool “BleachBit.” But this was labelled as “false” by NBC News Fact Check, saying that “Clinton’s team used an app called BleachBit; she did not use a corrosive chemical.” This shows that “fact checkers” are not free from stupidity: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/12/15/facebook-introduce-warning-labels-stories-deemed-fake-news/.
The mainstream media though, continuously churn out “false news”; as Mike Adams (Natural News.com, November 22, 2016) said: “[they] routinely lie on purpose to smear their political opponents while utterly and completely ignoring the scandals, collusion and criminality of failed candidates like Hillary Clinton.”
An alarming example of the establishment’s fake/false news fetish, was the claim by Barrack Obama that Russia had hacked the Democrat’s emails and thus had aided Trump in the election. He said that he would retaliate against Vladimir Putin, and began by expelling 35 Russian diplomats who were alleged to be involved in the hacking. Vlad Putin laughed at the little president and instead responded by inviting all the children of US diplomats in Russia to the Christmas and New Year tree in the Kremlin. Donald Trump tweeted on December 31, 2016: “Great move on delay (by V. Putin) – I always knew he was very smart.” Right he is.
Note that none of the Democrats ever commented on the contents of the emails, which if true revealed corruption and possible crimes (discussed below). If they had nothing to hide, then why the fuss? If the emails had false content, then wouldn’t the innocent have simply denied that they were authentic? Instead, the contents are implicitly accepted as true, for this is implicit in the claim that the emails were of benefit to Trump. So Obama and Clinton are not concerned with the dirt in the emails, only that the emails were hacked. But even here there is no evidence that there was a hacking.
Although the CIA supports the Democrats, the rest of the US “intelligence” community does not. Here is what one mainstream press release has said:
“The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber-attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday. While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named.” See: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-intelligence-idUSKBN14204E.
The NSA (National Security Agency) is quite capable of detecting hacking by foreign bodies. US intelligence experts have said that NSA can detect any data passing through the servers of the Democratic National Committee or Hillary Clinton’s emails, because we know from Edward Snowden that the NSA collects all data. Yet it has not supported the Russian hacking claim: https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/12/us-intel-vets-dispute-russia-hacking-claims/.
The evidence indicates that the email leaks were not hacked but leaked internally. Former UK ambassador Craig Murray claims that he flew to a secret meeting in Washington DC with a US source who had “legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks…Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians.” He rejected the CIA claims as “blatant lies.” He said that the informant was a Democrat insider who was “disgusted at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation.” See: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html. This is consistent with the claims made by Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, of the source being “internal.”
None of this, though, was a stop to the US House passing legislation dealing with Russian “propaganda “fake news” with H. R. 6393 Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017. The agenda is to attempt to undermine Trump, but also to attack an array of web sites exposing the criminality of the elites: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-02/house-quietly-passes-bill-targeting-russian-propaganda-websites.
What exactly have they to fear?
Pizzagate for One Thing
The Wikileaks releases of Clinton and Democrat emails, well illustrates the level of corruption of US politics. There is no reason to believe that countries like Australia are any different, but it is not likely that we will ever get to know the level of corruption of our elites. The Pizzagate scandal is one very interesting example of the likely depth of the corruption and evil. It is, of course written off as “fake news’ by all of the “fact checking” sources. The evidence at present is only circumstantial, but it is highly suspicious and deserves an investigation.
The claims that there is a paedophilia circle that embraces the big players in Washington DC, is dismissed by the establishment. But, these are the same chattering class that dismissed as extreme right conspiracy, the claims that a Muslim gang in Rotherham were running a paedophilic white sex slave ring. We now know that beginning in 1997, eight Pakistani men stood at the base of a group of perhaps 300, who gang raped and sexually trafficked over a thousand young white girls, some as young as 13. The police not only turned a blind eye to this because of fear of “racism,” but some even tipped off the gang when a few honest colleagues were getting close to finding the children, indicating a deep level of corruption in the police force which had not been addressed.
In the UK there was also the case of (Sir) Jimmy Savile, a celebrity who is believed to have sexually abused at least 450 victims, and in the US there is Jeffrey Epstein, deeply connected to Bill Clinton, who visited his island and flew in his plane, where sexual abuses are alleged to have occurred: “Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’”: https://www.rt.com/usa/343048-clinton-epstein-lolita-express/.
More recently in Norway, police have revealed that at least 50 people were involved in the sexual abuse of children, some being babies, and many cases involved perversion-crimes such as bestiality: http://norwaytoday.info/50-people-involved-atrocities-cruel-acts-children/.
So, the idea that Pizzagate should be dismissed with no investigation must be rejected.
Much internet speculation about John Podesta and other’s emails relates to the use of food terms that make no sense, seen in the context of bizarre painting depicting child abuse that the leading players have. Thus one of many emails goes along the lines of “Did you leave a handkerchief? Hi John: The realtor found a handkerchief. I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus (sic)? They can send it if you want. I know you’re busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.”
There are many emails like this that don’t make literal sense.
What is a map that is pizza related? It has been claimed that the terms are used as a code in the paedophilia world; “pizza” means little girl, handkerchiefs mean various BDSM codes (bondage/sadism), and a “map” is semen. See: https://www.darkmoon.me/2016/pizzagate-satanic-sex-and-pedophilia-in-high-places/.
Another email said: “Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in [the] pool for sure.”
A pool party for adult men with young children is highly suspicious, and there are many emails like that. See: http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/12/another-slice-of-pizzagate/.
This article is interesting because it suggests that there could be a link to the Madeline McCann disappearance and Pizzagate.
It is also disturbing to note that the Californian Democrats have now legalised child prostitution, for minors under the age of 18: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/california-democrats-legalize-child-prostitution/article/2610540.
This article states: “the unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn’t difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can’t interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.”
Polifact.com January 4, 2017, says that it is misleading to say that California legalised child prostitution. That is technically inaccurate; Senate Bill 1322 decriminalises minor prostitution, preventing police from arresting under age prostitutes. But for the ordinary people, who are not criminal lawyers, this is not “false news,” but basically correct, and at least has the same social effects and evils.
This is the sort of hair-splitting that the “fake news’ paradigm is ringing in. It’s much like Bill Clinton saying “I did not have sex with that woman.”
All of this too needs to be viewed next to a trend in the mainstream media to deconstruct paedophilia, seeing it as a “disorder, not a crime”: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html.
Trump was right in saying that the swamp needs to be drained, but it remains to be seen if he will go all of the way and drain it down to the last disease-carrying “mosquito,” as he seems to already be backing away from his election claims, surprise, surprise: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/newt-gingrich-trump-drain-the-swamp/.