Dr Wilyman on the True Cause of Covid-19 By Mrs Vera West
Australia’s leading vaccination critic, Dr Judy Wilyman has in her newsletter number 263, given a critique of the fundamentals of the very basis of the claim that there is a Covid-19 pandemic. No, she argues, it is more like a “plandemic” with a political agenda:
“Many things can be hidden in disease statistics - there are lies, damned lies and statistics. In Australia if you do not turn on your TV you would not know there is a 'pandemic'. And if you do not do a medical test then there would not be so many 'cases' of this 'new' disease. These tests are not identifying SARSCov2, the virus that is claimed to cause COVID 19 disease, and many of the 'cases' do not have any signs of disease. In Australia the cases are from testing the healthy population. This is all about the criteria used to diagnose this disease and the extra surveillance that is being done in healthy people to find claimed 'cases' of this new disease. Here is a summary of the main points that demonstrate that this is a pLandemic and not a pandemic of an infectious agent:
• The definition of a 'global pandemic’ was changed in 2009 - it is an arbitrary definition (described below)
• A mathematical model was used to predict a 'global pandemic' with flawed scientific assumptions to wildly over-exaggerate the deaths in all countries.
• Australia called the global pandemic (21 January) before the World Health Organisation had even assessed the human-human transmission of the virus in Wuhan, China - the only country where it existed at the time (41 cases). This was claimed to be a "precautionary measure" as NO cases existed in Australia. Then 100,000 test kits arrived in Australia on 18 March 2020 - the day before the virus was downgraded in the UK - ready to provide the 'cases' in healthy people for the predicted 'second wave' in the southern hemisphere winter.
• The virus that is claimed to be the cause has not been identified in any of the deaths or cases of this disease. Causality has not been proved because clinical symptoms (flu-like illness) and non-specific tests for common coronaviruses are being used for diagnosis.
• And the lung disease that is being observed is affecting the nervous system and could be plausibly linked to damage from the flu vaccine – which is the common factor in the majority of these deaths.
• Vasculitis and other neurological damage is a common side-effect of vaccines and the majority of the deaths are occurring in the aged-care facilities - just after the flu vaccine campaigns have been run. Could the flu vaccine be causing this spike in deaths in aged-care facilities as pneumonia has a non-infectious cause as well?
• China mandated the flu vaccine on 1 December 2019 for the first time.
• Italian doctors stated they began to see the first patients in November 2019, soon after the flu vaccines were administered.
• European numbers show a correlation between influenza vaccine and coronavirus deaths.
This is a well planned pandemic as described in Event 201 that was put on by the corporate partners who use the media to communicate their message on vaccines in global health policies. They also influence the design of the International Health Regulations.
Disease diagnosis is a grey area of medicine and changes in diagnostic criteria and extra surveillance for cases can be used to create the appearance of an increase in one disease and a decrease in another. A fundamental flaw in the description of this outbreak as a pandemic is the fact that it is based on a change in the definition of a pandemic. If the WHO had not changed the definition in 2009 there could not have been a prediction of a ‘global pandemic’ in 2020. Prior to May 2009 the definition of a pandemic included “a pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” This last phrase was removed in 2009, so that a pandemic could occur ‘when there are more cases of that disease than normal’. The definition no longer needed to include 'enormous numbers of deaths and illness'. However, the definition still requires that it must be a virus to which "the human population has no immunity" yet in the current situation we are testing for coronaviruses that humans will have some immunity to because they are very common. A 'case' is now being defined in 2020 as the presence of the virus (infection) in a person without any symptoms of disease. In other words a healthy person can now be a 'case' of COVID19 simply based on a test result - that is not specific for SARSCov2. In other words, the medical profession is not proving that the disease is caused by this infectious agent. And the government can find more cases of 'COVID19' by testing the healthy asymptomatic people and then claiming that there is a risk if they test positive to an antibody test that is not identifying the virus.
It is the asymptomatic healthy population that enables herd immunity to develop in the population - particularly as we already have some immunity to coronaviruses. But in this outbreak the healthy people are now cases of disease and we are being locked down and asked to social distance - actions that are the opposite to the scientific evidence for controlling infectious diseases for which we have some immunity. The more surveillance you do, the more cases of healthy people or people with mild flu-like symptoms, that you will find. So what does the FDA say about the ability of an antibody test to identify SARSCov2? The FDA says (quote) that “antibody tests should not be used to diagnose an active COVID19 infection”. This is because there are many false positives due to past infections with common coronaviruses. The test does not distinguish antibodies to specific strains of these coronaviruses. There are also many false negatives even when the person is actively infected. In Australia, the government mandated the flu vaccine for the first time for all visitors and healthcare workers for aged-care facilities on 1 May 2020 - just before the well predicted "second wave" of the 'pandemic' in June-July. Healthy Victorians are now being locked down again based on PCR and serology/antibody tests that do not identify the claimed causal virus. Australia has conducted 3,935,124 tests with 'positive tests' amounting to 0.4%. In Victoria there have been 2,300 cases reported to date but a 'case' can be a healthy person and the number of deaths is very low and mostly in the aged-care facilities. 'Cases' in healthy people are being emphasised by the Victorian Health Department website and the media, not deaths due to this disease.
The current CDC nucleic acid (RT-PCR) test kits for SARS-CoV-2 generate "30% false-positive and 20% false-negative results in the best state public health laboratory", Dr. Sin Hang Lee reported in a peer-reviewed article published in the International Journal of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, an online journal based in Japan" A case can be a healthy person that has a PCR or serology test that comes back positive and this result does not prove that this person has SARSCov2 the virus that is claimed to cause COVID19 disease. Both of these tests only identify the family of coronaviruses that cause the common cold - many people will be positive to these tests. There is a possibility of wrong diagnosis, unless the whole virus has been lab cultured and sequenced from the patient. And this is not done in any patient because it is uneconomical. In other words, the statistics of cases and deaths in this "pandemic" are completely flawed. There is no proof that the deaths that have occurred are not being caused by neurological damage from the flu vaccine. This is particularly the case as according to the latest serological and immunological studies, the overall lethality of COVID19 is about 0.1% - the same range as a strong seasonal influenza. The majority of the deaths are occurring in the aged-care facilities, in the elderly who have recently had the flu vaccine. These cases all have serious underlying health issues (co-morbidity) and a recent flu vaccine. This year many countries have mandated the flu vaccine for the first time and flu campaigns have occurred just prior to the spike in deaths that have occurred in the northern and the southern hemisphere.
Perhaps the vaccine is being used to give the appearance that it is a new viral disease and then a vaccine could be produced that would be the “end solution” as Bill Gates has stated - the unqualified billionaire that is influencing global health policies that are mandating vaccines. In Italy a doctor has stated that “COVID19 is a neurological issue probably affecting the central nervous system or a neurotransmitter and he can testify that it is not contagious”. He says it was around before the first case of this disease from China was presented in the media. He saw the first cases around December 2019 and early January 2020 and it was being treated with drugs that are inhibiters of neuronal functions at different levels. It is a problem of the lungs – diffuse edema and no-one was wearing masks or gloves and no caregivers were infected from this lung disease when it was first observed. This evidence does not support the claim that we have a 'global pandemic' of new coronavirus, for which we have no immunity. This lie has been used by governments to lockdown populations and remove fundamental freedoms in society without scientific evidence.”
Hard hitting stuff indeed. On the flu vaccine link, I also came across an interesting article by Gary Kohls MD, that maintained that the 1918 pandemic was vaccine-related:
“The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer. More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets. The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus. The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas. From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley. During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France. One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised. When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide. During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.
During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers. Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI. I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu. Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families. On my father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy. Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy. She died from “the influenza” in 1919. On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City. I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu. In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin. It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today. It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars. Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now? Between 1900-1920, there were enormous efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society. I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases.
1. Clean Water and Sanitation
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today. New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases.
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home. Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.
3. Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical Industry
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University). The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The Institute pioneered many of the approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse. The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.
US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available. Have doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians and engineers? If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018?
The Disease Was Not Spanish
While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the first cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918. I thought, how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected? Why “Spanish”? Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I. Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press. Free from censorship concerns, the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came from Spain. The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops, so they were content to scapegoat Spain. Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun fire, which was frightening enough without knowing that the trenches were a disease breeding ground. One hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic. If the flu started at a United States military base in Kansas, then the disease could and should be more aptly named. In order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic. It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic. If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918, or something similar. The Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many. It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment originating in the United States during the years of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.
The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus. It was Bacterial
During the mid-2000’s there was much talk about “pandemic preparedness.” Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918-19. Capitalizing on the “flu” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion-dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer. It is not my opinion that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact. According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is likely higher than 92.7%. The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.” “… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples. “There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.” Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied. That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer.
Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate?
When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.
Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded, and had 296,000 men. During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments. A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918
From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York. Received July 20, 1918
Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses. The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses. 4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%). A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose. What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe? Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us. An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918. By March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley. Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose? “… Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza. “Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad cold.” “Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints. “By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5) Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine. These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches. The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.
From Dr. Gates’ report:
“Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection. “Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night. “Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea. “The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.” According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis. The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting. How did the “Spanish Flu” spread so widely and so quickly?
There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved quickly during those 10 months. An article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.” “Finally, for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus. “For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from infections with influenza virus. “Persons with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”. While the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it. Those who became sick and survived became “cloud adults” who spread the bacteria to others, which created more cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on. The toll on US troops was enormous and it is well documented. Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the “influenza” traveled like wildfire through the US military. (substitute “bacteria” for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):
“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France … “As soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the front lines and replaced them with healthy men. “This process continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts—young, healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely virulent without danger of burning out. “… Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the Army’s debarkation point for France, and took influenza with them. “Medical officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38 hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next. “Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent 6,131 men to the hospital for influenza. Some developed pneumonia so quickly that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs…” “The United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine. “A 1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the preparation of anti-meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.” “The same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected …” An experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong? Is the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19? The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers. I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions.”
Well, good luck with that one, because this road is a hard one indeed. Quoting the above material is solely in the interest of public debate, what is left of it, and does not necessarily mean we endorse it. I for one, do not know. The censorship of medical critics is now as great, if not more so, than the censorship of race/immigration critics, as recent Facebook censorship indicates:
“Facebook has removed a video posted by Breitbart News earlier today, which was the top-performing Facebook post in the world Monday afternoon, of a press conference in D.C. held by the group America’s Frontline Doctors and organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots. The press conference featured Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC) and frontline doctors sharing their views and opinions on coronavirus and the medical response to the pandemic. YouTube (which is owned by Google) and Twitter subsequently removed footage of the press conference as well.
The video accumulated over 17 million views during the eight hours it was hosted on Facebook, with over 185,000 concurrent viewers. The livestream had accumulated over 17 million views by the time of its censorship by Facebook. In terms of viral velocity, the post was beating content from many other prominent accounts on Facebook today, including Hillary Clinton, Rev. Franklin Graham, and Kim Kardashian. Over 185,000 viewers were concurrently watching the stream when it aired live Monday afternoon. The event, hosted by the organization America’s Frontline Doctors, a group founded by Dr. Simone Gold, a board-certified physician and attorney, and made up of medical doctors, came together to address what the group calls a “massive disinformation campaign” about the coronavirus. Norman also spoke at the event. “If Americans continue to let so-called experts and media personalities make their decisions, the great American experiment of a Constitutional Republic with Representative Democracy, will cease,” reads the event’s information page. The event was organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots. “We’ve removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19,” a Facebook company spokesman, Andy Stone, told Breitbart News. The company did not specify what portion of the video it ruled to be “false information,” who it consulted to make that ruling, and on what basis it was made.”
The Covid-19 fiasco, and the race riots have a common core element, of breaking down normal society, and changing the mental framework of people so that they have zero resistance to the most vicious form of the New World Order by many magnitudes.