By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://blog.alor.org/

Do We Have Any Rights at All? No Right Against Medical Rape? By Charles Taylor (Florida)

     According to US constitutional lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, there is no constitutional protection against mandatory vaccinations:
  https://twitter.com/csthetruth?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1262116657394323456&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdailystormer.su%2Falan-dershowitz-says-its-legal-for-the-government-to-compel-you-to-be-vaccinated%2F

“"You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask." Thus, the government has constitutional authority to "literally...plunge a needle into your arm." “Let me put it very clear,” Dershowitz said. “You have no right to endanger the public and spread disease, even if you disagree. You have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business.”  “If you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm,” Dershowitz claimed.”

  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/power-to-plunge-a-needle-into-your-arm-dershowitz-says-forced-vaccinations-are-constitutional

     Where exactly this is stated in the constitution was not clarified, perhaps in the special vaccination section, but, given that lawyers can find a constitutional right to homosexuality in the document, even though homosexuality was illegal in the US at the time of the writing of the document, who knows? For lawyers, anything is possible since by sophistry anything could be justified. Still, there are common law arguments against the Dershowitz view, which Mike Adams expresses, with some, I believe, unjustified extrapolation to self-defence situations. So, before reading the quote, let me say that I disagree with it and the reference to shooting, and will offer a critique after the quote; remember, no violence!
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-19-mandatory-vaccines-are-medical-rape-and-a-form-of-felony-assault.html

“Mandatory vaccines are “medical rape” in the sense that they violate your body against your consent, causing physical and psychological harm or even death. Those who advocate mandatory vaccines are medical rapists who are, in effect, committing acts of felony violence against an individual. Medical choice is a pillar of Western medical ethics, and any government that would attempt to violate a man or woman’s body with a cocktail of potentially dangerous, foreign substances — including vaccine ingredients derived from aborted human fetal cells — is engaged in the kind of genocidal evil that the world witnessed with the Third Reich and the Holocaust. … Mandatory vaccination is a felony assault against your body, a form of medical rape. In the same way that Nazi Germany pushed forced euthanasia and mass killings, the mandatory vaccine pushers believe they can medically rape you and inject your body with unsafe, largely untested substances that have been fast-tracked through the vaccine factories as part of President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” … which is a disaster in the making. Any attempt to force a vaccine injection upon you is attempted medical rape and a violent, felony assault against your person. In most jurisdictions, Americans have the right to defend themselves against violent assaults through the use of lethal force. This means that if any “vaccine enforcers” come to your home and attempt to assault you and forcibly inject you with a vaccine against your will, you probably have the right to shoot them in self-defense. The existence of a pandemic does not give the state the right to medically rape you with experimental vaccines containing risky ingredients that may cause injury or death — something the U.S. government admits takes place every day in America. See VAERS.HHS.gov for government statistics on vaccine injuries and deaths. Anyone claiming vaccines are “safe” is either wildly ignorant or a malicious liar.

The fact that the felony assault against your person is being carried out with a needle rather than a knife does not exempt the violent attackers from your right to self-defense. The fact that the attackers represent the government rather than a drug cartel does not grant them any special right to violate your body, either. No government has the right to medically rape you in the name of “public health,” for if that were true, then governments could force us to give blood without consent, abort our babies on demand, submit to government blood draws to be allowed to return to work or even agree to be made infertile based on personal IQ scores. Any agent of any government who attempts to commit imminent medical violence against your body through the forced injection of risky vaccines without your consent frankly deserves to be shot in self-defense. This is precisely why the left-wing lockdown regimes that are pushing mandatory vaccines (i.e. California) are simultaneously pushing aggressive gun control laws. They don’t want citizens to be able to defend themselves against the government mandated euthanasia shots that will be falsely described as “coronavirus vaccines.” Remember: It’s really about depopulation and mass infertility or euthanasia. To get you to go along with it, they’ll tell you it’s a “vaccine,” even when the whole world knows that real vaccines couldn’t possibly have been subjected to rigorous quality control testing and long-term clinical trials in the short time during which we are told they were developed.”

     I think Adams goes over the top here claiming that there is a right of self-defence to shoot people wanting to vaccinate you. Clearly these will be health care workers with families and dependents, trying to do what they see is best, however much he disagrees … far different from the usual meth home invaders. Thus, we need to reject that rhetorical flourish outright. The worthy point, after jettisoning the claims of violent response (which will only lead to armed police going to people’s homes anyway, thus being totally counter-productive), is to see if some common law challenge can be made. That is not hopeless as some judges have struck out some US lockdown orders. There, hopefully, is a non-violent solution to this, but I guess ex-army guys always shoot first, and litigate second. Let’s not go there; we don’t need to. But, this does show the level of anger out there, and it is worth reading this, and pondering what will come in our future. Things are falling apart by the day, but I suppose when something gets this rotten, it is only natural.
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-19-commonsense-reasons-not-to-get-vaccinated-coronavirus-vaccine.html
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-05-18-who-inadvertently-admits-vaccinations-wont-work-against-coronavirus.html
  https://redpilluniversity.org/2020/05/18/robert-kennedy-jr-speaks-the-unspeakable-about-vaccines/

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Sunday, 31 May 2020
If you'd like to register, please fill in the username, password and name fields.