AI to Process Covid-19 Vaccine Reactions By Richard Miller
Over the fetid, radioactive pond, Beijing Biden is throwing out the first testing of the bubbling green toxic political waters of the New World Order and running the line that the coming Covid-1984 vaccine will be mandatory. Boy, anyone voting for Biden, even the foolish dead, who should know better, is going to get their just deserts, not desserts.
“Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said that an order mandating vaccination against the Wuhan coronavirus should be considered if it would help curb the outbreak. Biden made the statement during a town hall in Pennsylvania televised Oct. 15, adding that “the state of the nature of the vaccine when it comes out and how it’s being distributed” was a major decision in making the vaccine a must.
Despite saying that a number of people believe a vaccine against COVID-19 is “the golden key” to addressing the pandemic, Biden remarked that enforcing mandatory vaccinations was the problem. “You can’t say, everyone has to do this.”
Biden turned down the idea of using fines to enforce the mandates and suggested pressuring local authorities to implement rules they can enforce. “I go to every governor, mayor, councilman [and] every local official [to] say ‘mandate the mask.’ This is what you have to do when you’re out.”
Biden also emphasized the value of face masks and took a jab at Trump’s refusal to wear one
Biden remarked during the town hall that “the words of a president matter.” He cited an example of how this statement would be valuable during the pandemic: “You can go to ever governor and get them all in a room, all 50 of them, as president and say, ask people to wear the mask.”
“When a president doesn’t wear a mask, or makes fun of folks, like me, when I was wearing a mask for a long time, then people say ‘well, it mustn’t be that important,” Biden remarked. His statement appeared to be a swipe at President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly refused to wear a mask or face covering.
Trump mocked the Democratic presidential candidate’s mask-wearing habits during the first presidential debate last Sept. 29. “Every time you see him, he’s got a mask. He could be speaking 200 feet away from it. And he shows up with the biggest mask I’ve ever seen.”
Trump’s mockery did not unnerve Biden a bit, who replied that “masks make a big difference.” He echoed the same sentiments during the town hall: Vaccines were only secondary to masks in providing protection. “If you listen to the head of the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], he stood up and he said ‘you know, while we’re waiting for a vaccine … you wear this mask, you will save more lives between now and the end of the year.’”
Biden referenced a Sept. 16 testimony by CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield to the Senate Appropriations subcommittee, where Redfield said that wearing a face mask is “more guaranteed” to protect against the coronavirus than getting a COVID-19 jab. The director added that in case the vaccine fails to build an immune response to the coronavirus, the face mask will still protect against future infection.
Interestingly, Biden previously opposed vaccines
Biden’s comments on coronavirus vaccination during the Pennsylvania town hall appear to be a complete turnaround from his previous stance. He and his running mate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) expressed concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines developed under the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed.
“Who’s going to take the shot? Are you going to be first one to say ‘sign me up,’ they now say it’s okay?” Biden said during an interview with local Florida outlet WKMG News 6.
Meanwhile, Harris remarked in a separate interview: “I would not trust Donald Trump, and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and reliability of whatever he’s talking about.” She added that a rushed vaccine against the coronavirus was “an issue for us all.”
These remarks from the Democratic candidates led Trump to demand that both “immediately apologize for the reckless anti-vaccine rhetoric.” He added that Biden and Harris’ remarks “undermines science,” adding “they’ll say anything and it’s so dangerous for our country.”
Biden did not give full details about how he intended to deliver a jab in the butt, or is it arm (?) to all the teeming, sweaty smelly masses of so-called Amerika, but no doubt there will be another New World Order test run, maybe using the Chinese military, if the US military proves inadequate. That would be a sight, and I would not put it past him, and the Left would love the sight of their communist heroes, occupying the land, Red Dawn style.
Meanwhile, in my own country of the UK, while the establishment is blazing away full speed for a Covid vaccine, the UK government is also preparing for a flood of vaccine injuries, the liability of which never goes to Big Pharma, protected from litigation by law. Nice money if you can get it:
“The UK government has posted a bid and an award contract notice, seeking an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system that can process the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine injuries and side effects.
Titled simply, “Supplies – 506291-2020” and found at this link on Tenders Electronic Daily, this contract award notice we originally posted on October 19th, 2020 and is summed up as follows:
The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.
The request for the AI system to process covid-19 vaccine reactions comes from the UK’s Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the MHRA.
Further in the document, the MHRA describes an “extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine” and says that the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine adverse reactions will overwhelm its current “legacy systems.”
“If the MHRA does not implement the AI tool,” the MHRA explains, “it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.”
The extreme urgency status of this bid is further explained:
Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch. Leading to a inability to effectively monitor adverse reactions to a Covid-19 vaccine.
Events unforeseeable — the Covid-19 crisis is novel and developments in the search of a Covid-19 vaccine have not followed any predictable pattern so far.
What’s clear from the description in the contract award document is that:
- The MHRA is expecting covid-19 vaccines to cause a surge of adverse events / side effects.
- The MHRA is fully aware that these adverse events will harm and kill many patients. They specifically warn of, “a direct threat to patient life.”
- The MHRA’s legacy systems are unable to handle the expected volume of incoming reports of covid-19 vaccine injuries, meaning the expected volume of such reports will be very large and unprecedented.
- The MHRA recognizes the “extreme urgency” of putting a new system in place to identify the adverse reactions of covid-19 vaccines.
- The MHRA states that if a new AI system is not urgently installed, it will be unable to identify many of the adverse reactions stemming from the covid-19 vaccine, and that this failure will negatively impact public health. (i.e. People will die.).”
Why then, in this situation where for all we know, any one of us could fall victim to a Covid-19 vaccine injury, should such vaccines be mandatory? That seems to me to be a most basic violation of medical ethics, above all, do not harm.