A Tale of Anti-Hate Laws in Two Woke Nations By Bruce Bennett
Here is an update about the coming hyper-anti-hate laws in New Zealand and Canada. It will all get in, the sheeple do nothing in opposition. The only question is: which nation gets a pat on its head by the globalists, and a no-prize? It is going to be tough to decide, and there is only one packet of jelly beans to hand out as class prize, no sharing, that would be socialism.
“National’s leader had pondered whether calling someone a 'Karen' would become a crime under the new law on Twitter yesterday.
"Will calling a middle-aged white woman a ‘Karen’ now be a crime under Jacinda Ardern’s law?" she wrote.
Ardern used this against her while the two leaders squared off over the issue in Parliament's question time this afternoon.
Collins had asked for Ardern's response on a recent opinion piece by NewsHub's Tova O'Brien, which claims the Prime Minister is "wrong about the basic facts" of her hate speech law proposal.
"I disagree with that statement," Ardern said, before firing back at Collins.
"I also, as it happens disagree with the member's statement on Twitter that somehow it will become illegal to call someone a Karen.
"That is absolutely incorrect and I apologise that means these laws will not protect the member from such a claim."
The barb brought laughter from the Ardern's side of the House, with Collins even chuckling as she cracked a wry smile.
The Opposition leader then sought to raise a Point of Order with the Speaker.
However, she quickly rescinded it.
"I've decided not to ask that point, I thought it would be cruel to ask it so I won't," she stated.
The exchange comes as the Government is seeking feedback on sweeping proposals to alter New Zealand's hate speech law in the wake of recommendations from the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the March 15 attack.
Feedback sought on sweeping hate speech proposals
Changes to hate speech law and a proposal to make it illegal to incite others to discriminate against a protected group are on the cards.
Under the proposals, the penalty for inciting hatred could be three years in prison and a $50,000 fine. Justice Minister Kris Faafoi said that was determined based on comparisons with other offences.”
https://www.narcity.com/bill-c-36-proposes-50k-fines-for-hate-speech-in-canada#toggle-gdpr
“The federal government is proposing legal changes in an attempt to crack down on online hate speech in Canada.
The new bill — known as Bill C-36 —would make it easier for victims of hate speech to file complaints against those publishing offensive material online.
Canadians posting hate speech could also be ordered to pay victims up to $20,000, or they could face fines of up to $50,000 if they refuse to stop.
Here's everything you need to know:
What does Bill C-36 propose?
On June 23, the Liberals introduced Bill C-36, which proposes an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The proposed change would make the definition of online hate speech clearer and officially list it as a form of discrimination, according to the feds.
It would update the Canadian Human Rights Act to reinstate Section 13 — a section about online hate speech that was repealed in 2013.
The Criminal Code and Youth Criminal Justice Act would also be amended.
Those in favour of Bill C-36 say the changes will make it easier for victims of hate speech to file complaints against those publishing offensive material on the internet.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada David Lametti said the move is designed to "target the most egregious and clear forms of hate speech that can lead to discrimination and violence."
What is hate speech?
The proposed bill says that offensive language and content that "discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends" others will not necessarily automatically be considered hate speech.
Instead, hatred is defined more specifically in Bill C-36 as an "emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain."
Lametti told reporters, per CBC News, that the update will not target "simple expressions of dislike or disdain that pepper everyday discourse, especially online."
Private conversations are also exempt from the proposed changes.
What are the penalties?
While posting hate speech online would not be considered a criminal offence under the proposed update, it would be a violation of Canada's Human Rights Act.
Canadians found responsible for sharing offensive material that "is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals" will be ordered to stop expressing hate speech.
Those who continue to post hate speech online could then be ordered to pay penalties of up to $50,000.
If there is a victim in an individual case, the person responsible could be ordered to pay the victim up to $20,000.”
There, that should keep NZ and Canadian critics of the Great Replacement immigration quiet, too scared to make a squeak, at least until it is too late. Everyone will love each other at the point of the bayonet of law.
Comments