How to Deal with Lawfare, By Chris Knight (Florida)
Recent developments in the U.S. political and judicial arenas have sparked significant debate over the impartiality of the judiciary and the potential for political bias influencing legal decisions. These events underscore concerns about the integrity of governmental institutions and the balance of power within the American political system.
On February 12, 2025, Representative Eli Crane announced his intention to introduce articles of impeachment against a federal judge who had recently blocked the Department of Governmental Oversight and Efficiency (DOGE) from conducting an audit of Treasury payments. Crane argues that the judge's decision impedes transparency and accountability within the federal government, suggesting that such judicial actions protect fraudulent activities and undermine public trust:
Further scrutiny reveals potential conflicts of interest involving the same judge. Investigations have uncovered that the judge's daughter holds a high-level position within the Department of Education, an agency currently under evaluation by the administration by Elon Musk's DOGE.This familial connection raises questions about the judge's impartiality, especially considering the administration's plans to restructure or possibly dissolve the Department of Education. Just ask Musk who said: "A corrupt judge protecting corruption.""He needs to be impeached NOW!" And this is what seems to be set in motion now, but we will see how far it gets:
This situation is not isolated. There have been other instances where judicial decisions appear to reflect personal or political biases. For example, the same judge previously sentenced a 75-year-old pro-life activist, Paulette Harlow, to two years in prison for protesting at a late-term abortion clinic! That is Left-wing justice for you; antifa terrorists/arsonists from the 2020 riots across the US were let free. During the sentencing, the judge reportedly dismissed concerns about Harlow's health and the potential risks she faced in prison, leading to accusations of judicial overreach and insensitivity: https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-02-12-activist-judge-threw-a-prolife-grandma-in-prison.html.
These actions have prompted responses from political figures and commentators. Steve Bannon, a former advisor to President Trump, has been vocal about what he describes as "Democrat lawfare"—the use of legal systems to achieve political ends. Bannon suggests that such strategies are part of a broader effort to undermine political opponents through judicial means: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bannon-on-trumps-doj-a-lot-of-people-are-going-to-prison-for-democrat-lawfare-political-coups.
In response to these perceived injustices, officials within the administration have signalled intentions to prosecute individuals involved in what they describe as an "administrative coup" against President Trump and the American people. This move reflects a broader commitment to addressing actions within the government that are viewed as undermining democratic processes and the will of the electorate.
In short, at long last the crooks may get jail!
Comments