High Court Throws Out Activist’s Attempt to Stop the Voice Referendum By James Reed
This one is interesting; an indigenous activist’s case to halt the Voice referendum, lodged before the High Court of Australia, has been thrown out, being for various reasons, a matter that the Court would not consider. The case made by the activist was tht the Voice was an attack upon Aboriginal sovereignty, and was causing mental harm. That is exactly the opposite of the line pushed by the Yes mob and our prime minister; Yes is supposed to achieve the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which affirms Aboriginal sovereignty. So, who knows what it is supposed to do? Best to follow the line of vote No and let them sort themselves out.
Say, I just finished that paragraph when I noticed a blue-haired socialist girl sitting at the computer next to me. She was working on two fliers. One was about the Voice referendum, with a big heading of RACISM, all these types know. The other was for a pro-Palestinian rally. I looked at the Voice leaflet when she got up to print the other one (yes, I know, a bit nosey), and it was about a meeting to be held next week. So, it looks like our furry socialist “friends” have seen the opinion polls and are working on plan B which is to do a big racism thing. I am so tired of socialists, Leftist and all that tripe, I mean type.
“An Indigenous activist's High Court bid to stop the Voice to parliament referendum from going ahead has failed.
Robbie Thorpe, the uncle of independent senator Lidia Thorpe, sought to argue Saturday's vote was "an attack on Aboriginal sovereignty".
Thorpe said in a statement on Friday the denial of sovereignty was causing serious mental harm.
However, Chief Justice Susan Kiefel made a direction under High Court rules which meant Thorpe's writ was not accepted for filing.
The rule states "if a writ, application, summons, affidavit or other document appears to a registrar on its face to be an abuse of the process of the court, to be frivolous or vexatious or to fall outside the jurisdiction of the court, the registrar may seek the direction of a justice".
The justice may then direct the registrar to issue or file the document, or to refuse to issue or file the document.
Thorpe has previously sought to charge the Commonwealth with genocide.”
Comments