Hey Feminists! Women Leaders Want Meat Grinder Wars, Too! By Mrs. Vera West

In the feminist narrative, a recurring promise shines through: women in leadership will usher in an era of peace, their supposed nurturing instincts tempering the belligerence long associated with male rule. Yet, as Europe teeters on the edge of conflict in March 2025, a starkly different picture emerges, one that dismantles this ideal with cold precision. John Leake's critique in "Europe's Female Leaders Want War," published on The Focal Points:

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/europes-female-leaders-want-war

lays bare the actions of prominent female figures steering the continent toward confrontation, not calm. Far from proving women inherently pacific, these leaders—Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, and Sanna Marin among them—reveal a capacity for "insane violence" that rivals or exceeds their male counterparts, offering a compelling case against the feminist myth of gendered peace.

Consider Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, whose tenure has seen the EU adopt policies that provoke rather than placate Russia, a superpower already bristling under sanctions and encirclement. Her leadership, far from diplomatic, aligns with a militaristic streak that could easily be attributed to any hawkish male predecessor. Then there's Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign policy chief, whose rhetoric and actions push for confrontation over compromise, echoing the most aggressive stances of traditional warmongers. Sanna Marin, though no longer Finland's prime minister, left a legacy of steering her nation into NATO—a move framed as defensive but undeniably escalatory in a tense geopolitical landscape. These women, elevated to power, wield it with a ferocity that shatters the stereotype of feminine restraint.

History bolsters this observation. Feminist claims often lean on the notion that women, by nature, eschew violence, yet the record of female rulers tells a different story. Catherine the Great expanded Russia's empire through war, Queen Victoria presided over colonial conquests, and countless queens married to power pursued aggression as fiercely as kings. Modern Europe in 2025 fits this pattern seamlessly, with its female leaders not only matching but sometimes amplifying the martial tendencies of men. The argument that women's leadership inherently curbs conflict collapses under the weight of such evidence, exposing peace as a product of circumstance and choice, not gender.

What drives this reality is not biology but power itself. Feminism's rosy vision overlooks the truth that ambition, ideology, and the demands of geopolitics shape leaders more than any supposed maternal instinct. Von der Leyen, Kallas, and Marin operate in a world where survival and dominance trump sentiment, their decisions reflecting the same ruthless calculus that has fuelled male-led wars for centuries. To suggest otherwise is to cling to a fantasy that ignores the human capacity for violence—a capacity unbound by sex. In Europe today, as tensions over Ukraine and NATO expansion simmer, these women stand at the helm, their policies risking war rather than averting it, a damning rebuttal to the idea that their gender guarantees a softer touch.

The implications cut deeper still. If women in power prove as prone to reckless aggression as men, the feminist promise of a peaceful world under female governance unravels. Leadership traits—whether strategic cunning or a taste for conflict—emerge as gender-neutral, forged in the crucible of politics rather than the cradle of biology. Europe's current trajectory, with female voices among the loudest calling for escalation, underscores this parity. To elevate women expecting peace is to misjudge the nature of power, which bends all who wield it toward its own ends, be they clad in skirts or suits.

As the European continent braces for what may come, the case against feminism's gendered idealism grows undeniable. Female leaders, like their male peers, are not immune to the lure of "insane violence"—they embrace it, shape it, and wield it with equal vigour. This truth demands a reckoning: peace stems not from who leads but from how they choose to lead. To cling to the myth of female pacifism is to blind ourselves to reality, where all humans, regardless of gender, bear the same potential for creation or destruction. Europe's women at the top prove it, and the feminist dream falters in their shadow.