Heroes and Villains, and More Villains By Charles Taylor (Florida)

This is a prime illustration of the absurdity of the present political situation, and while the example is from the US, where everything is worse, the principle applies across the West. Thus, Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman was the force behind Trump's impeachment, and colluded with the "whistleblower" who leaked the contents of the former president's call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. That call was about the Biden crime family and was done for national security purposes, but Trump was impeached anyway. Thus, Vindman became a hero of the lamestream Leftoid media.

But this contrasts with alleged Pentagon document leaker Jack Teixeira, a 21-year-old junior enlisted airman with the Massachusetts Air National Guard, who had top secret security clearance that allowed him to access  Pentagon secrets regarding the Ukraine war. The media has roasted him, as the documents have a less than glamour US view of the war effort. As the Ukraine war is the big thing now for the elites and chattering class, that act is not to be tolerated, even though the same sources defend Vindman, as “orange man bad.” The only consistency here, is consistently corrupt.

https://thekylebecker.substack.com/p/ones-a-hero-the-others-a-villain

“Lt. Colonel Alexander Vindman was the driving force behind Trump's impeachment. Vindman is reported to have colluded with the "whistleblower" who leaked the contents of the former president's call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.

Trump was pressing for more information about former Vice President Joe Biden's threats against prosecutors investigating oil company Burisma, which had inexplicably hired his son Hunter Biden as a highly paid consultant despite no sign of qualifying experience. Donald Trump would later claim he had a "perfect call" with Zelensky, as he argued the declassified phone transcript showed.

The U.S. media had no problem championing Vindman as a "war hero" and "patriot" for coordinating with the "whistleblower" to divulge the classified information, despite it compromising national security and being of dubious value in supporting a narrative that President Trump had inquired about the Bidens entirely on the basis that it was a "political attack."

President Trump had a compelling justification for asking Zelensky for verifiable evidence of Biden family corruption: It was his duty as president to know in order to safeguard national security.

Yet the media lined up to support the partisan narrative that Donald Trump as seeking unsubstantiated "dirt" on the Biden family, which was implied as having done no wrong.

Contrast this lionization of the actual Trump impeachment 'whistleblower' with the treatment of the alleged Pentagon document leaker Jack Teixeira. The 21-year-old junior enlisted airman with the Massachusetts Air National Guard reportedly had top secret security clearance that allowed him to access the most sensitive Pentagon secrets regarding the Ukraine war effort.

On Friday, the Pentagon Papers leaker was arrested in his Massachusetts home and perp-walked in front of the watching public.

https://twitter.com/WCVB/status/1646581173185904640

“The New York Times had actually beaten the Federal Bureau of Investigation at the government agency's own game of identifying threats to national security.

"Federal investigators on Thursday arrested a 21-year-old air national guardsman who they believe is linked to a trove of leaked classified U.S. intelligence documents, which have upended relations with American allies and exposed weaknesses in the Ukrainian military," the Times reported.

"The man, whom The New York Times was first to identify as Jack Teixeira, is a member of the intelligence wing of the Massachusetts Air National Guard and is tied to an online group where the leaked documents first appeared," the report added.

The Times report also credited the Washington Post's reporting as having assisted in the identification and tracking down of the leaker.

"The Washington Post initially reported Wednesday night that according to members of the small invitation-only Discord chat community where the leaked intel first appeared, the person who posted them was a 'charismatic gun enthusiast' in his early 20s who created the group and apparently worked on a U.S. military base," the Times noted. "By the time he was identified as Teixeira by the New York Times, federal agents were already closing in."

The Post, ironically, characterized Teixeira as having a "dark view" of the U.S. government.

OG had a dark view of the government. The young member said he spoke of the United States, and particularly law enforcement and the intelligence community, as a sinister force that sought to suppress its citizens and keep them in the dark. He ranted about “government overreach.” OG told his online companions that the government hid horrible truths from the public.

The Intelligencer reported on the substance of the documents that were leaked onto the social media platform Discord.

The Post, in its report on the source of the leaks, said it “reviewed approximately 300 photos of classified documents” as well as text posts that apparently transcribe other intelligence reports. Much of the media coverage has focused on a collection of about 100 documents from the leak. From the Post’s reporting, it appears much more material than that was originally leaked, though most of the documents don’t appear to have been made public.

The surfaced files are photographs of briefing documents and slides, mostly prepared in February and March, based on intel collected by the NSA, CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, DEA, and National Reconnaissance Office (which manages U.S. spy satellites). Markings on the documents indicate that some were cleared for sharing with allies, while others were designated for U.S. eyes only — which was a major clue they came from a American source.

As the report notes, "many of the documents appear to have been prepared for Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff," although "anyone with a high enough security clearance would have had access to them."

That is quite the coincidence, given that General Milley will be stepping down from his post as the highest-ranking military officer in the United States by the end of the year.

Former chief of staff at the Pentagon and former deputy director of National Intelligence Kash Patel recently expressed to Breitbart News is how improbable it is that Teixeira acted alone.

"It’s just not possible,” he said. “You can be the biggest IT person in DOD, and you are still compartmented off of the actual information. Almost never does an IT person need to know, as we say, the substance of the intelligence. Their job is to provide the secure information systems around it to protect any disclosures,” he continued.

“This is crazy sensitive stuff,” he added. “Ninety-nine percent of people who have a Top Secret/SCI clearance don’t have access to this information. And me, as the former deputy DNI and chief of staff of the DOD and publisher of the [Presidential Daily Brief], with the highest security classification, knows that, literally, there is not a lot of people in the U.S. that have access to this kind of intel. It’s done for a reason. So this doesn’t happen.”

Patel said while the Joint Chief of Staff’s daily brief produced by its Directorate of Intelligence (J2) goes out to "thousands of people," there is "underlying contributing information that is compartmented and goes to fewer people."

“The underlying intel — that’s very sensitive because it exposes how we got it, who we got it from, when we got it, and whether we can get it again, how is that delivered,” he said.

The explanation of Teixeira's top secret document access at such a young age was reported by the Boston Herald.

"As a 'cyber defense operations journeyman,' Teixeira has held a top secret security clearance since 2021," the report noted. "For this, he had to a sign a lifetime binding non-disclosure agreement, acknowledging that disseminating protected information could result in criminal charges.

“He took advantage of his position, copying that highly classified information and then subsequently photographing it and posting it online,” retired naval Cmdr. Kirk Lippold, the former commander of the USS Cole when the ship was attacked by terrorists, told the Herald on Friday.

“He violated that trust, and he should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law, as should his superiors,” said Lippold, who added, “This was a failure by leadership. There was inadequate oversight, and there was a lack of accountability throughout the chain of command for this to happen.”

No such call for reprimand of Lt. Colonel Vindman for his partisan attacks on Donald Trump, whom he has referred to as a "moron," has similarly been forthcoming from the mainstream press. Indeed, the U.S. media has rushed to Vindman's defense (as well as that of his twin brother, Eugene) to shield him and his associate "whistleblower" from retaliation.”