Governments Solving Covid Vax Adverse Events by Not Reporting Them! By Brian Simpson
This is occurring in both Australia and the US. In Australia our vaccine injury watchdog, the TGA, is not going to report on myocarditis, heart inflation, associated with the vaxxes. According to one estimate, perhaps 550,000 Australians have had some form of myocarditis after the vax, so it is not an insignificant condition, and even if it was, it should still be reported upon, as that is their job.
And in the US, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe, stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply stated: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.” Yes, too bad if one has a Covid vax injury to report, it all gets swept into the memory hole now.
Of course, we must not let this go into the night, since the next wave of Covid restrictions, and an all-new Covid mRNA vax is on the way.
https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/australian-government-forced-to-cheat
“So…….problem solved…..from now on myocarditis is not going to be a problem…..they just won’t report it! Yes, you read that correctly. The TGA is not going to report it. It is all very normal. Just move on. Nothing to see here.
Go to my Substack of 31 July where I estimate at least 120,000 Australians may have suffered symptomatic myocarditis and a total of 550,000 may have had symptomatic or asymptomatic myocarditis and be at risk of cardiac arrhythmias, heart attack or sudden death.
EXCESS DEATHS
I’ve previously listed my top 10 tricks the Australian government is using to cover up the Covid disastrous policies and dangers of the injections. CLICK HERE to view.
While it is easy to hand wave away any causal link between the Covid injections and deaths reported in the Australian adverse event reporting system (DAEN), it is difficult to hide the fact that tens of thousands of Australians have died non-Covid deaths above the numbers normally expected in 2021 and 2022 after the shots were released (but not in 2020 when there were no Covid injections but the virus was at its most virulent). The most obvious explanation is that the Covid injections are causing an increase in unexpected recorded deaths from all causes. Until our government comes up with an alternative, credible and supportable explanation - we should all assume this to be the case.
So…..problem solved…..just get the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to change the historical baseline expected number of deaths from all causes before Covid. Maybe go to an outside consultant to get the number you want, pay them heaps, so one can claim “we didn’t do it….this was expert advice”. This latest trick is done using non-transparent modelling (the rule is to use guesswork modelling when the actual data does not support your case). Check out the numbers shortly to be published in Principia Scientific by Dr. Sy Wilson, an Australian expert statistical data analyst (below). Whacko! 12,000 Excess Deaths disappear and the total number of Excess Deaths following the Covid injection rollouts is now (only) 18,000 and not 30,000!
The only reliable estimate of Excess Deaths in 2022 is that number calculated in [a] where all deaths in 2020 were used as part of the baseline to calculate Excess Deaths (it was a year with, surprisingly, low numbers of total deaths)! The ABS have not provided a credible explanation as to why the total number of deaths in 2020 was not used in baseline calculations.”
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe website quietly stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply states: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.” If you go there today, V-safe directs users to the FDA’s VAERS website for adverse event reporting, even though officials continually derided VAERS as “passive” and “unverified.”
VAERS and V-safe are mutually exclusive safety collection databases operated by the FDA and CDC, respectively. VAERS is an older way of collecting safety data where one can fill out a form online, or manually, or by calling a toll-free number, whereas V-safe is a device “app” which requires online registration. Both VAERS and V-safe collect personal information, lot numbers, dates and associated information, but V-safe was an active collection system geared towards a younger app-using demographic.
Does this mean that the CDC believes that the mRNA Covid-19 injections are so safe, there is no need to monitor adverse event reports any longer? What is the argument against continued monitoring, especially since the V-safe website was already up and paid for?
While CDC’s V-safe was stealthily and abruptly turned off, refusing to accept new safety reports, to this very day the CDC continues to urge everyone ages 6 months and older to stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.
As a drug safety expert, I personally can’t cite another example of any agency or manufacturer halting collection of safety data. It seems even worse because mRNA technology is relatively new with long-term manifestations unknown. On top of this, both manufacturers and the FDA refuse to share the list of ingredients, such as lipid nanoparticles, which could affect individuals differently and take a long time to manifest clinically.
Safety Data Collection Should Never Stop
Now, contrast that with the fact that the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration (NHTSA) will still accept a safety report for a 30-year-old Ford Bronco II. Indeed, this is an oddly specific example, but only because I drove this exact vehicle as a family hand-me-down as a student, through my residency, fellowship, for my tenure as a Yale professor on the mean streets of New Haven and even during my years at the FDA as a medical officer /senior medical analyst.
Like mRNA shots, Bronco IIs are still available on the market and people are still using them up to this very day. My Bronco became an intermittent topic of conversation with friends and FDA colleagues. One day, I was informed by a patrolling security guard at the FDA that it was the oldest car on campus.
I didn’t know much about cars (or mRNA technology) back then, but when a fellow FDA-er informed me that my Bronco II had noteworthy safety problems and that the NHTSA still had their eye on this vehicle (rollover accidents were more common and more fatal) I addressed the problem: I got rid of the reliable relic, even though I really liked it.”
Comments