Good News for Julian Assange By Richard Miller (London)

Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange has been wanted by the US for releasing emails and other information which put the Democrats such as Hillary Clinton, and the Deep State in a very bad light. The material was released, and Trump could have used it for devastating effect, and still could, but did not. Assange was arrested on a supposed rape-type case in Sweden, which was dropped, but not before he was taken into custody. He ended up in Britain, and the latest is that the bid by the US to have him extradited to the US, where no doubt he would be "Epsteined," would be allowed to be challenged within the British legal system. The US, out of frustration, was considering allowing Assange to plead guilty to a reduced charge of mishandling classified information. Assange should have been given a metal as a hero.

However, it is now possible the extradition case will be defeated. Perhaps in the end, the US will drop the issue, grinding to a halt. After all, it showed the deep level of corruption within the US administration and maybe being quite about this is their best bet now?

https://www.warnoir.online/2024/03/breaking-london-court-rules-in-favor-of.html

"In a landmark decision that reverberates across international borders, a London court has ruled in favor of Julian Assange, allowing him to continue challenging the decision on his extradition to the United States within the British legal system.

The ruling comes amidst a high-profile legal battle surrounding the founder of WikiLeaks, who has been detained in a British prison since 2019. Assange's extradition to the U.S. has been a contentious issue, with supporters arguing that he faces persecution and an unfair trial in American courts.

The U.S. Justice Department had reportedly been considering whether to allow Assange to plead guilty to a reduced charge of mishandling classified information. However, the London court's decision to uphold Assange's right to challenge extradition marks a significant development in the case.

Critics of Assange's extradition argue that he should be afforded protection by British courts, especially considering the potential persecution he may face in the United States. German Chancellor Scholz has spoken out against Assange's extradition, emphasizing the need for British courts to provide him with necessary safeguards.

"I am of the opinion that it would be good if British courts provided him with the necessary protection, as he faces persecution in the US, given the fact that he disclosed American state secrets," Chancellor Scholz stated, echoing concerns about Assange's treatment and the fairness of his potential trial in the U.S.

The ruling in favor of Assange's extradition challenge underscores the complexities of balancing national security interests with individual rights and freedoms. As the legal proceedings continue, the case will undoubtedly remain a focal point of global attention, raising questions about press freedom, government transparency, and the limits of state power in the digital age.

Assange's supporters hail the London court's decision as a victory for justice and human rights, while critics caution against the potential implications of shielding individuals accused of disclosing sensitive government information.

As the legal saga unfolds, the world watches with anticipation to see how British courts navigate the intricate legal and diplomatic challenges posed by Assange's extradition case. The outcome will not only impact Assange's fate but also set precedents for future cases involving whistleblowers and journalists worldwide.