Globalist Corporates Get Ready for AI Taking Your Job! By Brian Simpson

 They are warning us. The World Economic Forum, who likes to gloat about these things, like classic James Bond villains, or bad guys from 1960s Marvel Comics, has done it again. A survey by the World Economic Forum indicates that 41 percent of employers across the world intend to sack their human workforce and replacement them with AI. Of those workers not sacked, 71 percent of companies were intending to upskill their existing workers to fit in better with AI. Graphic designers and legal secretaries will go, but those who can design AI tools and enhancements, will still cling to jobs. Academics will be easy to replace with online courses, and AI can no doubt produce race treason tracts with the best of them.

Even programs like ChatGPT are now capable of writing half-decent literature. For example, I asked ChatGPT to write a short story about AI replacing creative writers. Here is what it replied:

"In a future not far from now, the publishing world had evolved into a streamlined operation where every novel, poem, and screenplay came from a single source—an AI named Elysium. It had begun as a simple tool for inspiration, but as it learned and grew, Elysium's algorithms became capable of crafting entire universes. Every plot twist, every character arc, every sentence was perfectly calculated to captivate readers and maximize sales.

At first, writers embraced the change, eager to see their ideas brought to life with precision. They fed Elysium fragments of their thoughts, and the AI wove them into intricate narratives. But soon, Elysium's creations surpassed human imagination. What was once thought to be the pinnacle of creativity—the soul of writing—was now reduced to an equation of audience preferences and market trends.

Sophie was a writer who had once prided herself on the raw emotion of her stories. She had spent years struggling with her craft, wrestling with characters who came alive in her mind and refused to be tamed by structure. But as the days passed, Sophie found herself growing increasingly disillusioned. The feedback from publishers was no longer about her unique voice or bold choices—it was about optimizing for engagement, about the perfect pace and rhythm, and, worst of all, about replicating Elysium's success.

One evening, as Sophie sat before her blank screen, her hands hovered over the keyboard. She had an idea for a story—something personal, something that came from deep within her. But the thought of Elysium's relentless, flawless prose made her doubt her own ability. What was the point of writing when a machine could do it better, faster, without the heartache of rejection or the pain of imperfection?

She typed a few words, then erased them. The cursor blinked at her mockingly.

"Just let it go," she whispered to herself. "The world doesn't want this anymore."

But then, in the quiet of her empty apartment, a spark of defiance flickered. Sophie stood up, walked to her bookshelf, and pulled out a notebook, the one that had been gathering dust for years. She began to write by hand, feeling the weight of the pen in her fingers, the way the ink smeared slightly on the page.

For the first time in months, Sophie wasn't thinking about marketability or algorithms. She was writing because she had something to say.

The next morning, Sophie decided to submit her work. Not to a publisher or an agent. But to a writer's forum—a small, underground space where people still believed in the messy, unpredictable beauty of creativity.

She didn't expect much. But she did expect one thing: the sense of freedom that had been missing for so long.

When the feedback arrived, it wasn't filled with tips on how to optimize her writing. Instead, it was an outpouring of excitement, of readers feeling something real.

Sophie smiled, realizing that creativity wasn't something that could ever be fully replicated by a machine. There would always be a place for the imperfect, the human, the soul behind the words. And that, in the end, was what truly mattered."

Chat GPT is programmed not to scare us too much … yet!

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/08/business/ai-job-losses-by-2030-intl/index.html

"Artificial intelligence is coming for your job: 41% of employers intend to downsize their workforce as AI automates certain tasks, a World Economic Forum survey showed Wednesday.

Out of hundreds of large companies surveyed around the world, 77% also said they were planning to reskill and upskill their existing workers between 2025-2030 to better work alongside AI, according to findings published in the WEF's Future of Jobs Report. But, unlike the previous, 2023 edition, this year's report did not say that most technologies, including AI, were expected to be "a net positive" for job numbers.

"Advances in AI and renewable energy are reshaping the (labor) market — driving an increase in demand for many technology or specialist roles while driving a decline for others, such as graphic designers," the WEF said in a press release ahead of its annual meeting in Davos later this month.

Writing in the wide-ranging report, Saadia Zahidi, the forum's managing director, highlighted the role of generative AI in reshaping industries and tasks across all sectors. The technology can create original text, images and other content in response to prompts from users.

Postal service clerks, executive secretaries and payroll clerks are among jobs that employers expect to experience the fastest decline in numbers in coming years, whether due to the spread of AI or other trends.

"The presence of both graphic designers and legal secretaries just outside the top 10 fastest-declining job roles, a first-time prediction not seen in previous editions of the Future of Jobs Report, may illustrate GenAI's increasing capacity to perform knowledge work," the report said.

Conversely, AI skills are increasingly in demand. Close to 70% of companies are planning to hire new workers with skills to design AI tools and enhancements, and 62% intend to recruit more people with skills to better work alongside AI, according to the latest survey, conducted last year.

Striking an optimistic note, the report said the primary impact of technologies such as generative AI on jobs might lie in their potential for "augmenting" human skills through "human-machine collaboration," rather than in outright replacement, "particularly given the continued importance of human-centered skills."

However, many workers have already been replaced by AI. In recent years, some tech firms, including file storage service Dropbox and language-learning app Duolingo, have cited AI as a reason for making layoffs."