Global Medical Tyranny: The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and the Erosion of Freedom, By Brian Simpson

The World Health Organization's (WHO) adoption of its Pandemic Agreement on May 20, 2025, marks a chilling milestone in the push for global medical tyranny. Hailed as a "landmark" by globalists like Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong, this treaty, passed without a vote in Australia's Parliament or public consultation, threatens national sovereignty, medical freedom, and the right to question untested health mandates. Coupled with the damning revelations from Senator Ron Johnson's May 21, 2025, US Senate hearing on Covid-19 vaccine injuries, it's clear the world is being steered toward a future where unelected bureaucrats dictate our health choices, and dissenters are silenced. The real virus isn't a pathogen, it's obedience to a system that's already failed us.

The WHO's Pandemic Agreement, adopted by 124 member states with no objections, promises "greater international coordination and surveillance" to combat future pandemics. Sounds noble, right? But dig deeper, and it's a blatant power grab. The treaty empowers the WHO, a body that botched the Covid-19 response, to centralise control over global health policy, from vaccine distribution to pathogen data sharing. The Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Annex, still unwritten and under negotiation until at least 2026, would force countries to surrender virus samples and genetic data to a global system, ripe for Big Pharma exploitation. Despite being legally unenforceable until complete, the WHO is already urging "voluntary implementation," and compliant governments like Australia's are nodding along.

This isn't about health, it's about control. The treaty's drafts, as critics like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have pointed out, aim to shift authority from sovereign nations to unelected WHO technocrats. Kennedy slammed the agreement, noting the WHO's failure to reform after Covid-19 and its push to "lock in" the same dysfunctional policies that fuelled panic and harm. The treaty threatens "national sovereignty, forced compliance, and a one-world government model." The WHO's own history, changing the definition of "pandemic" in 2009 to declare an influenza crisis, shows it's more about agenda than science.

The Senate hearing led by Senator Johnson exposed the catastrophic fallout of the last "safe and effective" narrative, which the WHO's treaty seeks to enshrine globally. Subpoenaed records revealed the Biden administration knew about myocarditis risks from mRNA vaccines as early as February 2021 but suppressed warnings, leaving doctors and patients in the dark. VAERS data showed 38,607 reported deaths post-vaccination, with 9,228 within two days, and a potential toll of over 386,000 when underreporting is considered. Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, debunked the "rare" myocarditis claim, citing 1,065 peer-reviewed papers and cases like a 42-year-old man who died three days after a Moderna shot.

Even more alarming, OB-GYN Dr. James Thorp reported an 82% miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester, mirroring chemical abortion drugs, and animal studies showing a 60% destruction of ovarian reserve. Dr. Jordan Vaughn estimated 15 million Americans may be suffering vaccine injuries, with spike proteins causing systemic damage, racing hearts, brain fog, strokes, long after injection. Yet, the vaccine-injured, like Dr. Joel Wallskog, are abandoned, gaslit, and labelled "anti-vaxxers" for speaking out. If this is the WHO's track record, why trust them with more power?

The treaty's timing is ominous. Michael Snyder warns of "pestilences" on the horizon, citing Biblical prophecies and the growing threat of weaponised diseases. Biotech advancements mean a handful of rogue actors could unleash a pandemic deadlier than Covid-19, with bird flu already killing 90% of infected cats in one study. The WHO's response? More surveillance, more centralised control, and a treaty that could mandate vaccines and treatments, no questions asked. Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico called it "nonsense invented by greedy pharma companies," and nations like Italy, Poland, and the U.S. (which withdrew from the WHO) have resisted. But Australia's government, led by Wong, surrendered without a fight, bypassing public debate.

Some voices on X and Substack go further, alleging the treaty and mRNA vaccines are part of a depopulation agenda. A commenter on Snyder's Substack claimed, "The vaccines are depopulation bioweapons," pointing to falling fertility rates (1.62 in the U.S., an all-time low) and personal losses tied to vaccine injuries. While unproven, these concerns gain traction when we see the WHO pushing mandatory policies despite evidence of harm, like the 82% miscarriage rate or prolonged spike protein production. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shields Big Pharma from liability, only fuels suspicion, why protect companies if their products are truly safe?

The WHO's treaty isn't a done deal. Global pushback weakened its censorship and enforcement clauses, and the PABS Annex's delay buys time. Nations like Slovakia, Russia, and Iran rejected it, and the U.S.'s WHO exit sets a precedent. We must make this treaty politically toxic, flood politicians' inboxes, share the truth, and demand accountability. As George Christensen wrote, "The real virus is obedience." The Covid-19 vaccine saga showed us what happens when we trust blindly: suppressed data, injured millions, and a narrative that crumbled under scrutiny. We can't let the WHO turn that failure into a global mandate.

https://michaeltsnyder.substack.com/p/the-who-got-their-new-pandemic-treaty

https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/they-did-it-while-you-slept-and-wong

https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/who-pandemic-agreement-formally-adopted