George Christensen: On the UN’s Short Cut to Global Dictatorship By James Reed

George Christensen always sends out informative emails about the latest evils of the New World Order globalists. In this one, reproduced below, he summarises the UN plan, from the document  Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks – An Emergency Platform, for the UN to take a commanding role, over nation states, in the event of global crises. And, what is a global crisis? It is precisely what the UN defines it to be, with at present climate change being the key one; United Nations (UN) Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres has recently said that global warming is now so bad, via present northern hemisphere hot weather, that the planet is experiencing “global boiling.”

The way is thus clear for any number of “crisis’ policies, including climate change lockdowns; the elites noted that carbon emissions decreased when the economies were destroyed, so they are eager to give this another try. As George notes:

• United Nations(UN) Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, has proposed a plan for countries to surrender sovereignty to the UN in the face of global crises.
• In a document titled Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks – An Emergency Platform, Guterres outlines his strategy to enhance global responses to shocks, central to which is the “Emergency Platform”.
• This platform could be activated by the Secretary-Generalat any time during “global complex shocks”, demanding nations become subordinate to the UN.
• The proposal could permit the UN to exercise martial law powers during crises, superseding national government policies and imposing its own will instead.
• This proposal could be exploited by globalist figures like Bill Gatesand George Soros, undermining national sovereignty and centralising power within the UN.

The globalists have dispensed with the idea of keeping their plans for a one-world government secret.

What seems straight out of a movie plot, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has demanded that countries cede their sovereignty to the United Nations (UN) to better allow the world to tackle emerging crises.

In a document titled, “Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks – An Emergency Platform,” the UN Secretary-General provides his “action-oriented recommendations” on how the world can better respond to global shocks.

Central to his argument is a set of protocols he refers to as the “Emergency Platform” which could be activated by the Secretary-General at any time in the advent of “global complex shocks”.

This simply won’t be a mechanism to better coordinate a global response – it actively would demand subordination of countries to the UN, which would have been granted the “ability to secure (their) commitments”.

An excerpt from the document reads (at length):

Recent complex global shocks have shown that, at the global level, our existing, conventional crisis response mechanisms are not up to the task of responding coherently and effectively to global shocks that have an impact on multiple sectors simultaneously. We lack the necessary forums at the global level to tackle multidimensional threats with a multidimensional response. Our existing response architecture, while appropriate for specific events, is too fragmented and sectoral to respond effectively to complex global crises. Our global response is too often hampered by the absence of incentives for multilateral entities to contribute to collective results, and accountability mechanisms and mandates that do not encourage collaboration and joined-up efforts. We are often too slow to convene the right actors at the right level, and we lack the means to collaborate and coordinate across sectors and communicate clearly on what needs to be done. In respect to some specific types of shock, our global response mechanisms are weak or underdeveloped.

We must fill these gaps, learn the lessons from recent shocks and take a different approach – a multidisciplinary, multi-stakeholder approach that can enable us to better respond to future, complex global shocks. We need a more formal, predictable and structured approach. When the world faces a complex global shock, we must ensure that all parts of the multilateral system are accountable for contributing to a collective response. No single agency exists to gather stakeholders in the event of complex global shocks. The United Nations is the only organization that can fulfil this role. And we must take the decisions that can enable it to do so.

Building on the ideas in Our Common Agenda and learning lessons from these recent crises, I propose that the General Assembly provide the Secretary-General and the United Nations system with a standing authority to convene and operationalize automatically an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.

Essentially, this could grant the UN martial law powers in times of crisis, allowing it to override a national government’s policies and instead impose its own will.

Politicians would be made accountable for acting on the UN’s demands, instead of being accountable to the people who elected them.

Think about that for a moment; the possibility of your country’s fate, especially in a time of crisis, being decided not by your vote but by unelected bureaucrats in Geneva who think they know what is best for you.

Through the use of the “Emergency Platform”, the Secretary-General would also be able to bring on board any non-state actor to help design the UN-led response.

In all likelihood, it seems to be a vehicle that allows globalist billionaires like Bill Gates and George Soros to have a direct say over the internal matters of erstwhile sovereign nations.     

The Secretary-General justifies this by claiming that “the (COVID-19) pandemic showed that national governments and the global multilateral system were ill-equipped to deal effectively” with global emergencies and so a “more formal, predictable and structured approach” is needed.

Let’s just conveniently forget it was the recommendations by these globalist organizations that did the most damage; forced lockdowns, promotion of dangerous medical practices, and use of untested vaccines may have killed more people than the virus ever could.

If implemented, the UN and its globalist benefactors would be quick to exploit the “Emergency Platform” to further erode away countries’ autonomy and centralise power within the organization.

We cannot allow this to happen.

This proposal will be put to member nations of the UN in the so-called “Summit of the Future” to be held next year.”