From Bill Gates: His Contribution to the Depopulation Agenda: Self-Aggregating Long-Acting Injectable Microcrystals (SLIM) Technology … Be Concerned; be Very Concerned! By Brian Simpson and Mrs. Vera West
From a Christian conservative perspective, the article from The Focal Point (April 2025) about the "Self-aggregating long-acting injectable microcrystals" (SLIM) technology, funded by the Bill Gates Foundation,
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/gates-funded-self-assembling-microcrystal
raises serious ethical and societal concerns. Thepiece critiques SLIM as a tool for depopulation, highlighting its potential to exacerbate already declining birth rates. While that piece effectively exposes the risks, we'll improve upon it by offering a more structured, faith-based analysis, emphasising the sanctity of life, the natural order of creation, and the broader implications for humanity. We'll also push the argument further by exploring how SLIM could undermine God's design for family and propose a proactive, Biblically grounded response to the fertility crisis.
From the perspective of those advocating for depopulation, the SLIM technology, as detailed in the Nature Chemical Engineering study (March 2025), represents a significant advancement in achieving their Satanic goals. Below, we'll present anaccount of SLIM from this viewpoint, focusing on its potential to address globalist population culling concerns, while grounding the response in a Christian conservative critique that upholds the sanctity of life (Genesis 1:28, "Be fruitful and multiply").
For depopulation advocates, SLIM is a breakthrough in controlling global population growth. The technology allows for the self-injection of microcrystals that form a semi-permanent implant, releasing the contraceptive levonorgestrel for months or potentially years. This long-acting mechanism ensures that individuals in low-resource settings—where access to healthcare is limited—can reduce fertility without frequent medical interventions. The Gates Foundation, which funded the study, has long emphasised reducing population growth to address supposed environmental concerns, as evidenced by Bill Gates' 2010 TED Talk statement: lowering the population by 10-15% could help "get CO₂ to zero." From this perspective, SLIM's ability to sustain contraception for extended periods (up to 97 days in rats, likely longer in humans) is a highly efficient tool to curb birth rates, especially in regions with high fertility, such as sub-Saharan Africa, where the 2024 Global Burden of Disease Study noted fertility rates above replacement levels (2.1 births per woman).
SLIM's design makes it uniquely scalable for mass deployment. The study highlights its delivery through tiny needles (25-30 gauge), minimising discomfort and enabling self-administration, which eliminates the need for surgical implantation or removal, as required by traditional contraceptive implants like Nexplanon. For depopulation advocates, this accessibility is a win: it can reach remote populations without the infrastructure for medical procedures, ensuring widespread adoption. The ScienceDaily report (March 2025) notes that SLIM could "mimic the long-term drug release of surgically implanted devices," making it a cost-effective solution for global health initiatives aiming to reduce population growth, or rather, eliminate humanity. From this viewpoint, SLIM's low-cost manufacturing aligns with the Gates Foundation's goal of providing affordable solutions to curb population in developing nations, potentially reducing the global population from 8 billion to 6.8 billion, as Gates suggested. If that is not depopulation, what is?
Depopulation proponents oftendelusionally argue that reducing human numbers alleviates pressure on natural resources and mitigates climate change. SLIM's ability to lower birth rates supports this agenda by decreasing future population growth, which the Gates Foundation dubiously links to lower CO₂ emissions. The 2024 Global Burden of Disease Study, also funded by Gates, predicts that by 2100, 97% of countries (198 of 204) will have fertility rates below replacement levels, leading to a natural population decline, which Gates celebrates. SLIM accelerates this trend, ensuring fewer births and thus fewer resource consumers. For fanatical globalist advocates, this is a positive step toward "sustainability, reducing the strain on food, water, and energy systems," which aligns with their interpretation of "stewardship" over the earth (think domination)—though this starkly contrasts with the Christian view of stewardship, which includes multiplying and filling the earth as God commanded (Genesis 1:28).
From the depopulation perspective, SLIM empowers individuals—especially women—by giving them control over reproduction without the burden of daily pills or frequent medical visits. The IFLScience article (April 2025) notes that SLIM combines "long-term drug release with the simplified administration of injectables," offering a convenient option for women in low-resource settings. Advocates might argue this reduces unintended pregnancies, which the Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2022) identifies as a global issue leading to abortion and maternal death. By framing SLIM as a tool for reproductive choice, depopulationists can market it as a humanitarian effort, even as it serves their broader goal of reducing global population, and hence being a tool of quiet genocide.
While the depopulation agenda may see SLIM as a triumph, a Christian conservative perspective views it as a profound violation of God's design for life, family, and creation. Here's how this technology undermines Biblical principles, followed by a call to action to address the fertility crisis.
SLIM's purpose—to suppress fertility for years with an irreversible implant—directly contradicts the Biblical mandate to "be fruitful and multiply" (Genesis 1:28). The womanosphere, as previously discussed at the blog, emphasises the joy and purpose of motherhood, rooted in passages like Psalm 127:3 ("Children are a heritage from the Lord"). By promoting long-term contraception with no clear removal method, SLIM risks rendering women infertile indefinitely, especially in low-resource settings where surgical intervention isn't feasible. The Nature Chemical Engineering study confirms the implants remained intact for 97 days in rats, with unknown long-term effects in humans due to slower metabolism. This aligns with the article but goes further: it's not just a health risk but a spiritual assault on the family unit, which Scripture upholds as the foundation of society (Ephesians 5:22-33).
The lack of a removal protocol for SLIM implants raises serious ethical concerns. From a Christian perspective, life begins at conception (Psalm 139:13-16), and any technology that prevents conception indefinitely—without the ability to reverse it—devalues the potential for new life. The Gates Foundation's depopulation agenda, as articulated in the 2010 TED Talk, prioritises environmental goals over human flourishing, a stance that conflicts with the Christian belief that humanity is the pinnacle of God's creation (Genesis 1:26-27). Furthermore, the unknown long-term effects of SLIM, as noted in the study, could harm women's health, violating the principle of doing no harm (Luke 10:27, loving your neighbour as yourself). This technology could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, echoing historical abuses of reproductive control, such as forced sterilisations, which Christian ethics unequivocally condemns.
The article piece rightly highlights the global fertility crisis, with the 2024 Global Burden of Disease Study predicting a population collapse by 2100. SLIM exacerbates this crisis by further suppressing birth rates, which are already below replacement levels in 155 of 204 countries by 2050. From a Christian conservative perspective, this is alarming: declining populations threaten cultural stability, economic growth, and the ability to care for the elderly (1 Timothy 5:8). The womanosphere's focus on family aligns with this concern, advocating for policies that support motherhood rather than suppress it. SLIM, by contrast, serves the depopulation agenda at the expense of future generations, ignoring the Biblical call to raise up godly offspring (Malachi 2:15).
To counter SLIM and the broader depopulation agenda, Christian conservatives can take proactive steps rooted in faith and practical wisdom (James 1:5):
Promote Family-Centric Policies: Advocate for government incentives for larger families, such as tax breaks, parental leave, and affordable childcare, reflecting the womanosphere's values. A 2024 study by the Institute of Family Studies found that countries with pro-family policies, like Hungary, saw a 10% increase in birth rates over a decade.
Address Environmental Toxicants: The article mentions pollutants and nanoplastics as contributors to fertility decline. Christians can lead in environmental stewardship (Genesis 2:15) by supporting regulations on endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which a 2023 Environmental Health Perspectives study linked to a 20% drop in sperm counts since 2000.
Support Natural Fertility: Encourage education on natural family planning methods, which align with God's design for the body and have a 98% effectiveness rate when used correctly (per a 2023 Fertility and Sterility study). This empowers couples to plan families without relying on harmful technologies like SLIM.
Prayer and Advocacy: Pray for leaders to prioritise life-affirming policies (1 Timothy 2:1-2) and advocate against technologies that undermine fertility, such as SLIM, through public campaigns and community outreach.
From a depopulation perspective, SLIM is a powerful innovation: it efficiently reduces birth rates, is accessible and scalable, supports New World Order environmental goals, and supposedly empowers "reproductive choice." However, from a Christian conservative viewpoint, SLIM is a grave threat to God's design for life and family, accelerating an already critical fertility crisis while posing ethical and health risks. By promoting family-centric policies, addressing environmental factors, supporting natural fertility, and engaging in prayerful advocacy, Christians can counter this agenda and uphold the sanctity of life.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/gates-funded-self-assembling-microcrystal
A new study published in Nature Chemical Engineering titled "Self-aggregating long-acting injectable microcrystals" reveals Bill Gates's latest investment. As expected, this "innovation" does not improve the health of humanity by any means, but instead seeks to further reduce already-collapsing birth rates.
The technology, dubbed SLIM (Self-aggregating Long-acting Injectable Microcrystals), enables the self injection of microcrystals that self-assemble into a semi-permanent drug implant. The implant slowly releases synthetic hormones like levonorgestrel—a potent contraceptive—over months to years.
While the study frames SLIM as a step forward in medical innovation, closer inspection reveals grave concerns:
Irreversible implants: Once injected, the microcrystals self-assemble into a dense, solid mass deep in subcutaneous tissue. The study provides no method for removal, raising the possibility that these implants are effectively permanent, particularly in low-resource settings without surgical infrastructure.
Unknown long-term effects: In rats, the solid implant remained intact for at least 97 days—the full length of the study. In humans, where metabolism is slower and tissue clearance is more complex, these structures could persist for years with unknown consequences.
Widely available, extremely long-lasting anti-fertility implants are a dream come true for depopulationists. Bill Gates, the funder of this study, publicly revealed his preference for reducing the population by 10-15% in order to "get CO₂ to zero."
"First we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people, that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10-15%" - Bill Gates at TED2010
The Gates Foundation also funded a study that was published last year titled "Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021." They estimated irreversible population collapse within the next few decades:
By 2050, over three-quarters (155 of 204) of countries will not have high enough fertility rates to sustain population size over time; this will increase to 97% of countries (198 of 204) by 2100.
Let's get this straight: The same foundation that acknowledges an inevitable population collapse—without any intervention—is simultaneously funding invasive technologies that would only accelerate it:
We need to reverse the major decline in birth rates to preserve civilization. A few months ago, I identified some key targets:
A study by Aitken found that fertility rate declines are driven by both short- and long-term factors. In the short term, socioeconomic drivers like urbanization and delayed childbearing, as well as issues such as obesity, falling sperm counts, and environmental toxicants (e.g., pollutants, nanoplastics, and electromagnetic radiation), compromise reproductive health. Long-term factors include reduced selection pressure on high-fertility genes due to smaller family sizes and the widespread use of assisted reproductive technologies, which may perpetuate poor fertility genotypes in the population. Addressing these issues is essential to mitigating the ongoing fertility crisis.
Comments