FBI Targets the Unvaxxed By Charles Taylor (Florida)

While this story may seem only relevant to Americans, it does show how police forces can become corrupted once they are subjected to woke, as was done during the Covid lockdowns. I saw on YouTube the glee that US police had in brutalising those who dared escape their cages, such as in New York, and similar things occurred in other jurisdictions, such as Canada and Australia. Fingerprints being taken of unvaccinated teachers and being sent to the FBI, is simply a continuation of the reign of terror of the Covid Terrorist State Apparatus (CTSA). We do not know whether of not something like this was done in other jurisdictions.  

https://teachersforchoice.org/2023/02/09/fingerprints-of-unvaccinated-nyc-teachers-flagged-to-fbi/

“On February 8, 2023, while arguing on behalf of fired NYC workers who declined covid vaccination, attorney John Bursch stated in open court that unvaccinated teachers in New York City were flagged with problem codes in their personnel files, and when that occurred “their fingerprints are sent with that flag to the FBI and the New York Criminal Justice Services.”

You can listen to Bursch make this statement at the 5:30 mark of the audio recording of the court proceeding.

The source of this information is Betsy Combier who wrote an affidavit (see pdf below) in the Kane v. de Blasio case where she stated unvaccinated teachers were given a “problem code” label that was “then sent to the national databases at both the Federal Bureau of Investigation” (FBI) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

In federal court on February 8th attorney Susan Paulson who was defending NYC stated that educators fired for declining covid vaccination were not removed for misconduct, but rather for not meeting a requirement for employment.

If there was no misconduct, why are unvaccinated educators fingerprints sent to the FBI?

I believe that unvaccinated NYC educators were being setup to be viewed as “right-wing extremists” or even “terrorists.” We know for many years Dr. Peter Hotez has been promoting an insane narrative that those who are “vaccine hesitant” are an extremely dangerous group, and that we need to look to Homeland Security and even NATO for suggestions of how to deal with such a “threat.” (watch Part 1 & 2 of Dan Cohen’s investigation into Dr. Peter Hotez)

If we look at those who declined covid vaccination through this lens, it is easy to see why their sensitive biometric information like fingerprints would be illegally sent to the FBI.

Educators who declined covid vaccination – including myself – had every right to do so. No one is a “terrorist” or “extremist” for holding the line of what does and does not go inside of their bodies – especially injected directly into their muscle tissue.

These developments are certain to open up a new round of lawsuits.

Violations of educators (and students) rights to their biometric information by NYC is no surprise to me. The first time I sued the city was back in 2020 over in-school covid testing and the privacy rights to the DNA in the specimen provided. Turned out the covid testing company then-mayor Bill de Blasio contracted – FULGENT GENETICS – reserved the right to utilize DNA samples obtained from covid testing and catalogue it in proprietary libraries the company owned. Also turned out Fulgent had close ties to the Chinese Government.

Never trust NYC or their Department of “Education.””

I think a similar conclusion can now be made about most of the institutions of society in the West, not just the police, but universities, health services and much more. To achieve the Great Reset, and Great Replacement, it has been necessary to weaponise these institutions against, we, the people.

https://reclaimthenet.org/fbi-censorship-surveillance-weaponization-government-hearing

“During a Thursday House Judiciary Committee hearing on the “Weaponization of the Federal Government,” whistleblowers and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents roasted the agency’s potentially First Amendment violating censorship collusion with Big Tech firms and hit back at the FBI’s secret surveillance practices.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the Chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, highlighted an FBI whistleblower’s November 2022 claims that the agency accepts private user information from Facebook without the user’s consent and that this information is only from the conservative side of the political spectrum during his opening statement.

“In my time in Congress, I have never seen anything like this,” Jordan said in reference to the numerous whistleblower claims about the FBI’s politicization and surveillance.

In his written testimony, former FBI agent Thomas Baker criticized the agency’s “promiscuous spying on Americans” via Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants (a controversial type of surveillance warrant that has been used by the FBI to secretly collect the personal information of more than three million Americans).

Baker also described the FBI’s censorship collusion with Twitter as “a perversion of the First Amendment.”

And during his appearance as a witness, Baker discussed “reverse targeting” — a surveillance technique used by various federal government agencies to circumvent legal restrictions that prohibit these agencies from spying on Americans when questioned by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY).

“They would target a foreign person who was close to an American they were really interested in and then when they picked up that information on the Americans, ‘Aha, we got it in incidental…collection,'” Baker said. “That was all phony and false. It wasn’t incidental collection at all.”

Baker continued by suggesting that Congress “address and correct” this practice by instituting penalties for this type of behavior.

Massie also called out the FBI’s use of FISA to surveil Americans, saying that it had been used to collect “millions of exabytes of data.”

“When what you’re collecting incidentally becomes the entire universe, I think you might need a warrant to go and look at that information,” Massie added.

Baker blamed former FBI Director Robert Mueller for the FBI’s change in culture to an “intelligence-driven” agency and said the FBI now operates “through deceit and deception.”

Law professor Jonathan Turley said the FBI’s censorship collusion with Twitter raises “serious questions of whether the United States government is now a partner in what may be the largest censorship system in our history.”