Fat, Glorious Fat, Glorious Fat (With a Dollop of Lesbianism) By Mrs Vera West

     Play in the background “Food, Glorious Food”: from the musical Oliver (1995), based upon Charles Dickens’ classic novel Oliver Twist (1838). But today, replace “food’ with “fat.”

     Showing that fat is a feminist issue: http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/24/feminist-professor-claims-fatness-is-liberatory-is-shocked-by-women-who-laughed-at-her/, Arizona State University Professor Breanne Fahs, a self-described “fat woman,” who teaches Women and Gender Studies at the said university, was surprised when the women in a survey she conducted thought that gaining 100 pounds was a negative thing, while she thought that getting fat was a “liberatory” experience. A “lavatory” experience would also be an option. Which just goes to show that one woman’s fat is another woman’s poison.

     She is not the only one thinking along these lines. Academics at the university of North Carolina have argued that being fat is “fashionable and fit,” in a “peer reviewed” journal article,  Body Image (vol. 22, 2017, pp. 53-64), no doubt reviewed by academic peers, who think like them:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/21/unc-charlotte-prof-says-obesity-is-fashionable-and-fit/
https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9611
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S174014451630314X/1-s2.0-S174014451630314X-main.pdf?_tid=6639dc18-8b88-11e7-8420-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1503880540_180c1fb84bc8e0e9bb2ac5b52cf8001d

     Other feminist academics have claimed that losing weight is “dangerous”:
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/21/bradley-university-womens-studies-project-claims-losing-weight-is-dangerous/
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/08/17/college-tells-fat-students-not-to-lose-the-weight-because-it-could-be-dangerous/amp/

     Along with “false news,” we also have “false science,” especially in pseudo- sciences such as sociology, where bodies of confirmed scientific studies from mainstream sources, and even alternative ones, are discarded in favour of feminist ideology. Obesity is physically unhealthy, but the feminists do not accept that because many are obese themselves. Rather than trying to overcome this by cutting the carbs, they keep to their cream cake diet. I recall every Women’s Study conference that I have attended, there were always ultra-sweet cakes at morning tea, done as a political statement. The academic feminists were obese.

     The result will be feminists being culled out by natural selection, as heart disease and diabetes work their magic. What a tragedy.

     Oh, how could I have almost forgotten this one; a study published in Science Direct by Professor Menelaos Apostolou, at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus, has concluded  that lesbian and bisexual attraction all stems from male desire:  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917303422
The “male choice” hypothesis is that there are selective advantages to be had from female same sex attraction, namely that in patriarchal societies women are less likely to roam to other males, their sexual desires being constrained:

“Another cuckoldry-protection mechanism may be a male preference for female partners who experience same-sex attraction. In particular, if a man’ opposite sex partner has sex with another women, this act does not increase his risk of being cuckolded, since such a contact does not lead to conception. Actually, same-sex infidelity may reduce this risk: A woman, driven by her sexual desires, may seek sexual contact outside her long-term intimate relationship. There may be many reasons for doing so, including her partner not being able to satisfy her sexually because he is absent, ill, or no longer sexually attracted to her. When this woman has sex with another woman, she does not have sex with another man, which translates into same-sex contact reducing the risk of cuckoldry by diverting women’s urges toward non-reproductive outlets.
As men cannot always guard their partners, and because, they cannot always impose heavy costs on them if they cheat - they are limited for instance, in using physical punishment, due to the risk of retaliation from women’s parents - they are always vulnerable to cuckoldry. Accordingly, female attraction toward the same-sex can be useful for men as a protection against cuckoldry, especially when they cannot protect themselves through other means. In addition, such same-sex attraction can be particularly beneficial for men who marry polygynously, a practice which is common in pre-industrial societies… Men with multiple wives, as opposed to men with one wife, face an elevated probability to be cuckolded, because they have to divide their sexual effort toward several wives so, inevitably, some of their wives will remain unsatisfied. They also have to divide their mate-guarding effort between multiple wives, which makes such effort less effective. If their wives experience same-sex attraction, they can satisfy their urges with other co-wives, who are readily available, reducing, in effect, the risk of cuckoldry.
Another benefit that a man can accrue from an opposite-sex mate who is experiences same-sex attraction can be to gain access to other women. In particular, if a man’s partner has sex with another woman, there is an elevated probability that he gains also sexual access to this other woman. In this respect, the same-sex attraction of his partner constitutes a window of opportunity for a man to have sex with other women without much mating effort, as this effort is made by his partner. Overall, there are at least two possible benefits that men can derive from having opposite-sex partners with same-sex attractions, namely a reduced risk of cuckoldry and an elevated probability to gain access to the reproductive capacity of additional women without much mating effort.”

     Is this true? Who knows, but the feminist/lesbian team have gone mad with anger over this suggestion. So, it must be good research. Even if it was not, at least it is entertaining as it gets up the snouts of the new class, which is not a healthy place to be.