Failed Climate Change Predictions of Doom By James Reed

The environmentalists, and especially the climate change hysterical version, have made numerous predictions of doom, which, fortunately have not come true. It was global cooling in the 1970s, then morphing to global warming in the 1980s. Throughout that time, the population issue got a regular outing, with the likes of Paul Ehrlich who in his best-selling book, The Population Bomb (1968) had predicted a Malthusian crash of population within a few years because of a shortage of food. That proved to be spectacularly wrong, but Ehrlich is still at it making a similar prediction of global doom due to biodiversity decline. It seems that what matters here is the fear factor, to keep the population in a state of high anxiety, so by a diabolical dialectics, the “solution” can be offered to these non-problems, which always involves less freedom and more globalist control. The present use of climate change mania, to limit cars, meat and farming is a prime example.

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/failed-climate-predictions

“In 2013 The Guardian wrote an article saying that the Arctic would be ice-free in two years. Does anybody remember the ice-free Arctic in 2015?

Professor Peter Wadhams was heralding a methane catastrophe. I guess after such a terrible prediction, Wadhams retired? Of course not, he is still a professor at Cambridge University and he’s still writing books and recording videos in which he tries to terrify everyone about the impending ice free Arctic (in another two years of course).

In 2018, Jeff McMahon wrote an article in Forbes claiming that “We have five years to save ourselves from climate change, Harvard Scientist Says”.

The Harvard scientist was a chap called James G. Anderson. He said “the chance that there will be any permanent ice left in the Arctic after 2022 is essentially zero”. Don’t tell Anderson but it’s 2023 and there is plenty of ice left in the Arctic.

When the article was written, Anderson prosecuted a moral argument that implicates university administrators who refuse to divest from fossil fuels, journalists who fail to fact-check false statements made by political candidates and executives of fossil fuel companies who continue to pursue activities that are exacerbating climate change. “I don’t understand how these people sit down to dinner with their kids because they’re not stupid people”, he said.

I don’t understand how end-of-the-world doomsters such as Anderson sleep at night. Climate anxiety is a major mental illness in the young, all because of failed predictions such as his ones. I know lecturers at my local university who have to give climate counselling before and after each lecture, just in case something they talk about triggers an anxiety attack in their students - bonkers.

Furthermore, young adults are deciding not to have children because of climate change and instead gluing themselves to runways, begging their governments to impoverish them further. The only global catastrophe there will be is when there aren’t enough humans being born.

I guess Anderson must have retired now, after so many failed predictions. Once again, of course not, he is still a professor at Harvard. And the Forbes reporter, Jeff McMahon, is still at Forbes, still telling us the world is going to end.

These people expect us to take them seriously and listen to their dire warnings. ‘But this time I am 100% definitely right, my models were not adjusted correctly last time, you need to listen to me now’. It seems that if you are part of the climate death cult, you can make as many false predictions as you like and you still keep your job. Just as long as you keep making scary predictions to control the masses.”