Extreme Weather is Not Evidence for Climate Change By James Reed
At the moment there are concerns about super-floods devastating the state of California. Is this something previously unheard of? No, these floods have happened in the past, and will happen again. The same thing has been said about the extreme cold now in the US, that this allegedly shows the extreme weather events are indicative of climate change. Note how it is said "climate change" rather than global warming, as extreme cold is contrary to the hypothesis, that at that point in time there was a rise in average temperatures. The cold will statistically push the mean value down.
As noted by Malcolm Roberts, extreme weather has been a feature of Australia. Floods especially have been a grave problem, and will remain so for as long as manic developers, fuelled by the even more insane immigration cult, push for more people to be grounded on flood plains. As well, the One Nation policy of more dams to capture water which can be used for houses and especially agriculture, would be a further help. What is not a help, but a curse, is the fear narrative of seeing floods here in Australia, which unquestionably have been devastating, destroying people's homes and livelihood, due to some global warming event, that can only be controlled by doing everything the globalist UN and World Economic Forum dictate. That is the path to enslavement.
https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/extreme-weather-is-not-climate-change/
"Weather events bring destruction to Australian communities every year.
These severe weather events have been a part of Australia's landscape for hundreds of years and a feature of this continent for millennia.
Way back in 1908, Australian poet Dorothea Mackellar in her famous poem "I Love a Sunburnt Country" accurately described our country using the term "of droughts & flooding rains".
The mouthpiece media has sold Australians a lie — that these weather events are "unprecedented". They are not.
The mouthpiece media is complicit in a worldwide con to claim there is a "climate catastrophe". If they admit that severe weather events have happened in the past, this kills the fake "climate emergency" narrative they're pushing.
The reality is weather events that were more severe can almost always be found in Australia's weather records. Evidence of even worse weather events is available in weather records and news reports since the 1870's and in stories or geological signs over the centuries prior to the 1870's.
Credentialed scientists writing peer-reviewed journal articles have pointed out that severe weather events have not been increasing. For going against the "climate catastrophe" narrative with data and facts, they were hounded down, unjustly vilified and often censored and silenced.
The fact that these weather events aren't increasing in severity or frequency doesn't mean their effects are any less destructive. All weather is normal. Apart from areas of extensive clearing such as in Africa, humans have no effect on weather.
The sun and our solar system drives and determines weather. When short term narratives are employed, it appears abnormal (which is how the media scares people about "climate change"). When we look at the longer-term cycles we find Earth is repeating similar weather.
As a country, we can use minimisation and adaptation to ensure natural extreme weather events cause less destruction. For example, stop building more houses on floodplains.
These real solutions to helping minimize destruction are not being talked about while the mainstream media continues to push their fake "climate catastrophe" narrative.
Well-meaning Australians are being caught up in these lies as the media claims almost every single weather event is due to "climate change" instead of the truth that it's just natural variation.
On floods especially, One Nation's policy of building more dams across the country will help mitigate the effects of future rain events and capture that water for productive agriculture and town use through drought periods that inevitably follow.
Solutions are available. We just need them to be focused on reality and common-sense incentives instead of fraudulent "climate change" narratives that only help the parasitic climate billionaires get richer."
Comments