Electoral Fraud: Here, There and Everywhere By James Reed

Let us see if Australia’s mainstream media will report on this now, with to date to a man/woman/transgendered person, they have said nothing to see here. Arizona samples 100 votes, found 3 percent fraud, so larger audit been officially granted.


But, that is only the tip of a very dark iceberg, even in Arizona:


“An Arizona state representative called to withhold the state’s Electoral College votes for Joe Biden. Republican State representative Mark Finchem, who stands for Ariz.’s 11th legislative district, exhorted the withholding as he believes “there is enough significant evidence of fraud to invalidate [them.]” Finchem made the calls during a Nov. 30 public hearing, in which members of President Donald Trump’s legal team appeared before Ariz. state legislators.

Finchem chaired the Nov. 30 hearing, with a number of lawmakers from both houses of the state Congress on the panel. Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis were among the Trump legal team members who appeared before the panel: They brought out many credible witnesses who testified about Democrat voter fraud via the Dominion voting machines and other irregularities. Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai also presented “very powerful” data to Ariz. lawmakers disproving the idea that Biden won the state.

Giuliani and Ellis asked the Arizona legislature to either withhold their electoral votes or assign them to Trump after making their case: Finchem subsequently called for the first option.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs certified the state’s election results in the middle of the hearing, which led Finchem to call for withholding the poll results after the Trump legal team presented its evidence. He said: “We are clawing our Electoral College votes back, [and] we will not release them. That’s what I’m calling our colleagues in both the House and the Senate to do: Exercise our plenary authority under the U.S. Constitution.”

Two Republican figures in the state stood by Finchem when he made the announcement: Republican Senate Majority Whip Sonny Borelli and U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ). Borelli’s presence signified that Finchem’s plan to withhold the Electoral College votes may already be receiving support from the Ariz. GOP leadership.

Arizona is among many other states that saw election fraud during the recent polls.

Cybersecurity expert Colonel Phil Waldron was among the witnesses the Trump legal team brought during the Nov. 30 hearing. He warned that Dominion voting machines are vulnerable to both onsite and offsite manipulation, and spoke about potential voter fraud in the state’s most populous counties of Pima and Maricopa. According to Waldron, Dominion voting machines could be connected to the internet – posing a severe security risk. Representatives for the voting machine manufacturer claimed that this was impossible.

The cybersecurity expert also said a Maricopa County official claimed the area failed to validate signatures on some ballots, while a witness from Pima Count reported that votes had been “embedded” in some precincts to help Biden win.

Aside from the instances mentioned by Waldron, Maricopa County voters claimed that some election officials gave them Sharpie markers. They provided markers subsequently invalidated their ballots after they bled through. Many had demonstrated all across social media how Sharpie ink bleeds right through a paper ballot to make it unreadable.

However, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors claimed that Sharpies “do not invalidate ballots” and are even “recommended by the manufacturer of the new vote tabulation equipment because they provide the fastest-drying ink.” The board further added: “The offset columns on ballots ensure that any bleed-through will not impact your vote. For this reason, Sharpies were provided to in-person voters on Election Day.” People who voted by mail could use Sharpies, blue pens or black pens, it said.

Nevertheless, Ariz. Deputy Solicitor General Michael Catlett wrote a letter to Maricopa County Elections Department Director Scott Jarrett indicating the attorney general’s intent to examine the complaints. Catlett’s Nov. 4 letter read: “We have received hundreds of voter complaints regarding the use of Sharpie brand markers … to fill out ballots on Election Day at voting centers. Voters are concerned that the use of Sharpies may have caused ballots to be rejected, spoiled or cancelled.”

Our baker’s dozen of Australian conservative media figures need to look at Trump’s claims, and do your duty as journalists, not media toadies, and bloody well report. You don’t have to agree, you can love Beijing Biden as much as the next globalist. Look, if you are too bloated from a good consumer life style, heavy meals, the wine at the restaurants at lunch time … here it is for you, direct from the man himself, Trump:


Donald J. Trump



 “Nevada 'fraud': 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as 'homes'”



“The Trump campaign on Wednesday unveiled a tranche of information it plans to present to a Nevada state court Thursday that suggests there were thousands of fraudulent votes cast — possibly enough to overturn Joe Biden’s win there by 33,569 votes.

Officials said that among the evidence and expert testimony to be presented in Carson City are indications that over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, that 42,248 people voted “multiple times,” data on a huge spike in incomplete voter registrations, and home addresses in temporary RV camps and casinos.

They also plan to present polling that 1% of Nevada voters shown to have voted never did and 2% of those shown to have voted by mail never got a ballot.

The legal team was quick to note that it has just begun to collect information and that fraud cases can sometimes take months to years to investigate.

EPA expands social media reach to Parler, among first in government.

Mike Braun says half the country wants Trump fraud claims investigated, rips media’s dismissal.

Pro-Biden effort offered Native Americans $25-$500 Visa gift cards and jewelry to vote.


Officials also added that they have been stonewalled by U.S. Postal Service and state and county officials in their efforts to review votes and registrations.

Their focus has been in Democratic-heavy Clark County, where Biden won by 90,922 votes. Biden won 521,852 to President Trump’s 430,930. By contrast, in 2016, Trump won 511,319 votes and lost it to Hillary Rodham Clinton by just 26,434 votes.

One of the leaders of the effort, American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp, told Secrets, “In my years of experience in politics, I have never seen the amount of illegal voting like we have documented in Clark County, Nevada. It is a level of corruption I didn't think could happen in a modern, free country.”

Donald J. Trump




“Dominion contractor at Detroit counting center says thousands of ballots were scanned multiple times”




“[A] contractor for Dominion Voting Systems, who worked at Detroit's TCF Center on Election Day, has told Michigan lawmakers that she saw roughly 30,000 ballots being scanned multiple times by the counting machines.

The contractor, Mellissa Carone, who works as a freelance IT professional, made the allegations Wednesday night before a panel of Michigan House Oversight Committee members.

Carone was at the Detroit center early on Election Day, Nov. 3, until about 4 the next morning. She also returned to the site later on Nov. 4.

On November 10, Carone said in an affidavit that she witnessed "nothing but fraudulent actions take place."

"I observed numerous employees, city workers, running batches of ballots through the tabulators countless times, without discarding them first," Carone said during the Wednesday evening hearing.

She testified next to Rudy Giuliani, the personal attorney to President Trump, who has been leading most of the litigations efforts pertaining to the election. 

Carone testified that on Election Day, the vote tabulating machines would jam up to three times an hour. When the machines would jam, election officials were supposed to reset the count on the machines to ensure that no ballots were scanned more than once, explained the witness.

"Instead of discarding, they were just rescanning, rescanning, rescanning. Counting ballots nine to 10 times," Carone said. She also said there were more than 20 tabulating machines at her ballot counting center. 

The ballots were meant to be counted in batches of 50, though, Carone noted that she observed the tabulation count climb well into the hundreds multiple times throughout the day.”

Donald J. Trump




“Pro-Biden effort offered Native Americans $25-$500 Visa gift cards and jewelry to vote”




“Key Native American leaders working with the Biden campaign offered tribal members and associates Visa gift cards, jewelry, and other “swag” to vote in the presidential election, according to several videos being used by the Trump campaign’s effort to challenge Nevada’s vote.

In one long video, officials from the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony are shown offering a raffle for gift cards in values of $25, $100, $250, and $500 to those who can prove they voted.

Other gifts for voting include bracelets, necklaces, earrings, T-shirts, and masks.

“If you come here to vote or if you voted already, RSIC is having a raffle,” said RSIC spokeswoman Bethany Sam in one of the videos.”

Donald J. Trump



Wow! Blockbuster testimony taking place right now in Georgia. Ballot stuffing by Dems when Republicans were forced to leave the large counting room. Plenty more coming, but this alone leads to an easy win of the State!


Team Trump



WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes


Twit Twitter says that this claim is disputed; wow, what claims are not disputed? Oh, only claims by the scum bag Left. And, you can watch a video of this occurring right before your eyes, but no, Twitter does not see, which is the typical Left deconstructive strategy.


I am angry about this, and I am not even in America! Really, this is an assault upon Western values, in favour of New World Order communist corruption. Even Australians should be outraged!

Trump in his recent speech spoke of a siege being conducted against the constitution and China had a major part to play with interference, through releasing the Wuhan flu, that was used by Democrats to print ballots, and hide fraudulent voting slips, printed in China:


“First, he lays out that he has a sworn oath to defend the United States Constitution against the wartime “siege” that’s under way:

As President I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the constitution of the United States. That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege.

He then explains that the vote was criminally rigged with “fraud” (which is a crime) and that it’s now time to overturn the election results and correct them:

Millions of votes were cast illegally in the swing states alone, and if that’s the case, the results of the individual swing states must be overturned, and overturned immediately.

Then he explains that China was part of this entire plan from the very beginning, via their engineering and launching of the coronavirus, which Democrats used to justify mass mail-in ballots which were used to steal the election. This statement specifically invoked national security elements of our defense protocols:

The Democrats has this election rigged right from the beginning. They used the pandemic as an excuse to mail out tens of millions of ballots, which led to a big part of the fraud… and there is no one happier than China.

Trump then calls for a “full forensic audit,” which can obviously only take place under military authority, since the local elections officials are corrupt, fraudulent criminals. He explains this himself:

Dramatically eroding the integrity of our elections was the Democrats’ number one priority. For a simple reason: They wanted to steal the 2020 presidential election. All of the Democrat efforts to expand mail-in balloting laid the groundwork for the systematic and pervasive fraud that occurred in this election.

Then, about 30 minutes into the speech, he invokes legal language that clearly references Trump’s Sep. 12, 2018 executive order which describes remedies for foreign interference in U.S. elections. Here’s what Trump says:

The only conceivable reason why you would block commonsense measures to verify legal eligibility for voting, is you are trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud. It is important for Americans to understand that these destructive changes to our election laws were NOT a necessary response to the pandemic. The pandemic simply gave the Democrats an excuse to do what they were trying to do with many many years.

Note carefully the phrase, “…trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud.”

Where have we heard something very similar before? In the 2018 EO, which describes who will be subjected to having all their assets seized by the United States government — and note that this applies to corporations, individuals, partnerships and even non-profits: (emphasis added)

Sec. 2. a (ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i)

Sec. 2. a (i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election;

Thus, Trump just invoked the 2018 EO and sent an undeniable signal to Chris Miller at the DoD (as well as many other groups) that the Democrats, the treasonous media and the complicit Big Tech giants have all engaged in concealing, advocating or supporting “foreign interference” in the U.S. election.

Treason, rendition flights and military tribunals.

What is the remedy for such actions of treason against the United States?

Under existing U.S. law, it’s a felony crime to try to rig votes. Under military law during a time of war, it’s treason. And under the 2018 EO, each of the entities engaging in this behavior will have all their assets seized by the U.S. Treasury.

Translated into plain language, this means that Twitter, Facebook, CNN, the Washington Post, Google, MSNBC, etc., are all now able to be completely seized, shut down or taken over by the Trump administration, as they all engaged in the defined behaviors outlined in the 2018 EO, which Trump just cited.

Consider that as I list all the evidence that Trump’s attorneys and DoD “white hat” team members now possess, much of which will surely be presented to SCOTUS, most likely by Sidney Powell, once one of her cases reaches that level of the judicial system:

  • CIA director Gina Haspel admitting to election interference in a full confession which has now been acquired.
  • Dominion executives confessing to engineering backdoors into the systems, which has also been acquired.
  • Packet analysis results from “white hats” who intercepted all the real-time vote rigging traffic, which includes the specific instructions from CIA servers to add the hundreds of thousands of votes in real time to Dominion tabulation machines in swing states. This is now publicly confirmed by Col. Phil Waldron.
  • Log files and software evidence from the seized CIA servers in Frankfurt, which provides physical and intellectual proof that the CIA inserted hundreds of thousands of votes into the Dominion tabulation machines.

All this evidence exists right now. Trump has it all. His speech lays the official groundwork that can now be cited by other officials (namely, in the DoD and Treasury, which runs the US Secret Service), in order to justify their own initiation of orders for further arrests, rendition flights and wartime activities necessary to defend the United States of America against foreign enemies who are waging cyber warfare against the United States.

10 USC 394: Authorities concerning military cyber operations

In case you’re wondering whether the U.S. military under Trump really has the authorization to respond to acts of cyber warfare with coordinated conventional military actions, read 10 USC, Section 394. Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 19, which is available via uscode.house.gov:

  • 394. Authorities concerning military cyber operations
    (a) In General.-The Secretary of Defense shall develop, prepare, and coordinate; make ready all armed forcesfor purposes of; and, when appropriately authorized to do so, conduct, military cyber activities or operations in cyberspace, including clandestine military activitiesor operations in cyberspace, to defend the United States and its allies, including in response to malicious cyber activity carried out against the United States or a United States person by a foreign power.

(b) Affirmation of Authority.- Congress affirms that the activities or operations referred to in subsection (a), when appropriately authorized, include the conduct of military activities or operations in cyberspace short of hostilities (as such term is used in the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93–148; 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.)) or in areas in which hostilities are not occurring, including for the purpose of preparation of the environment, information operations, force protection, and deterrence of hostilities, or counterterrorism operations involving the Armed Forces of the United States.

(c) Clandestine Activities or Operations.- A clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace shall be considered a traditional military activity for the purposes of section 503(e)(2) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3093(e)(2)).

  1. f) Definitions.-In this section:

(1) The term “clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace” means a military activity or military operation carried out in cyberspace, or associated preparatory actions, authorized by the President or the Secretary that-

(A) is marked by, held in, or conducted with secrecy, where the intent is that the activity or operation will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and

(B) is to be carried out-

(i) as part of a military operation plan approved by the President or the Secretary in anticipation of hostilities or as directed by the President or the Secretary;

(ii) to deter, safeguard, or defend against attacks or malicious cyber activities against the United States or Department of Defense information, networks, systems, installations, facilities, or other assets; or

(iii) in support of information related capabilities.

Trump announced “offensive cyber operations” just one week after signing his Sep 12, 2018 Executive Order

As you ponder all the implications of that, note carefully that just 8 days after President Trump signed his September 12, 2018 executive order, the Trump administration announced the launch of “offensive cyber operations” against foreign enemies. This was reported by the Washington Post, which explained, “The strategy incorporates a new classified presidential directive that replaced one from the Obama administration… It allows the military and other agencies to undertake cyber operations intended to protect their systems and the nation’s critical networks.”

What would be considered “offensive cyber operations?” Kraken, of course. The 305th military intelligence battalion.

Of course, just 8 days earlier, President Trump had designated elections infrastructure as “critical infrastructure.” So now the pieces fit. The circle is complete. The election theft was cyber warfare against critical U.S. infrastructure. This authorizes all kinds of national security activities, such as using U.S. Army Special Forces units to raid the CIA server farm in Frankfurt, which took place shortly after the election.

Also in 2018, President Trump had authorized the National Security Presidential Memoranda (NSPM) #13, covering “offensive cyber operations.” Here’s a list of all the NSPMs, but notably, “offensive cyber operations” is a secret and is not publicly shown.

In fact, the Trump administration fought to keep this document hidden from Congress, given that in 2018, the House was run by Pelosi and other treasonous actors who had just pulled off the 2018 cyber attack on the U.S. elections infrastructure, stealing dozens of House seats in order to “win” a majority in the House, from which Adam Schiff could launch his impeachment scheme to try to remove Trump from power.

Trump was able to prevent the House from reading NSPM #13 for 17 months, according to Fifth Domain, which reported:

“On a bipartisan basis some of us sent a letter to the Trump administration demanding that they share with, at least some of the leadership on the Armed Services Committees, the rules of engagement for certain cyber contingencies,” Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, said at the time. “The Obama folks did give us that information, the Trump people changed it, but then they were reluctant to show us.”

What we now know is that Trump was planning the 2020 election sting / cyber warfare “trap” in 2018, and that these cyber warfare response protocols were intentionally kept from Congress for as long as possible while plans were put in place to catch the Democrats stealing the next election (the 2020 election).”

But who will conduct the audit? It would seem that the military will grab all the ballots, and they do the recount under limited martial law. Hell, I say go for it, have total military law. If we can be all forced to be locked up and wear face masks, then why not? If you are going to make omelettes, then you have to break the eggs.



No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 22 April 2024

Captcha Image