Did Trump Sexually Harass on Twitter? By Ian Wilson LL.B

     What took the liberal elites so long to get to their destination? Clearly, their aim with the sexual moral panic over men in power asking actresses/women for sex, something that goes on in millions of bars right across the West every night, was to work up to having another go at taking down Donald Trump.  It did not work in the election, but now, well, it is worth a go.  It was tried to bring Judge Moore to his knees and get him to pull out of the Alabama election. Instead, Moore basically told the chattering class where to go and pressed on.  But, the moral panic was enough among white women to cost him the election, narrowly.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/11/steve-bannon-theres-a-special-place-in-hell-for-republicans-who-do-not-back-trump/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sadly-trump-is-winning_us_5a2b1110e4b022ec613b823f

     Now, let us examine one allegation against Trump with the eye of a lawyer:
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/12/12/brzezinski-trump-literally-sexually-harassed-gillibrand

     This is what Trump said:

“Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump.  Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!”

     Now, at first I did not recognise the sex of the person Trump was attacking. “Lightweight” and a “flunky,” these terms can apply to people regardless of gender.  It is absurd to propose otherwise. Hence, what is involved here is yet another mad, mad, mad, new class witch-hunt.
    I wonder how long people will put up with this nonsense?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/12/sarah-sanders-donald-trumps-kirsten-gillibrand-comments-were-not-sexual-innuendo/